NP Rank:
America’s stake in California Governor Race
I hate to say it, but if anything is “same old same old” as Jerry Brown alleges he should look in the mirror. I am not saying that Brown is like all politicians, but Brown is a professional lifer politician who hasn’t accomplished anything else. When he had his turn at governor, he did OK, but did not delivery stellar performance. As mayor of Oakland, a downgrade, he actually did quite well at keeping crime lower than in history for that city, however, he did not bring large employers to the city as is needed. There is no indication that he can revitalize the California economy. Meg Whitman, on the other hand, is a successful entrepreneur and not a lifer politician. While she hasn’t said how she will do it, I bet she has a better chance than Jerry. The risk, however, is that Whitman will not be able to form a government and deal effectively with the State legislature. That’s Brown’s advantage. In the end, California has two good and different choices. America has a stake in the outcome because California is large, the gateway to the Pacific economies, and the hotbed of controversy about illegal immigration. Save California and you might get a chance to save the nation. On that score, sorry Jerry, you are too old and had that chance once. I give the edge to Meg Whitman.
“Whitman and Brown's final debate a contentious one
The rivals for California governor continue their attacks on each other and stick to their talking points without offering details on how they would fix the troubled state.
In a blistering final debate, Democratic candidate for governor Jerry Brown apologized to his Republican counterpart Meg Whitman on Tuesday for a slur directed at her by an associate, an apology that Whitman did not explicitly accept as she cast his campaign as insulting to all Californians.
Brown continued to insist that Whitman was seeking office to enrich wealthy Californians such as herself, while she derided Brown as a "same old same old" politician who helped lead California into its present straits and said she represented a fresh start for the beleaguered state.
The 60-minute contest, held at Dominican University of California in San Rafael, crackled with disagreements on a host of issues, but the sharpest jousting came on the dispute that has roiled the campaign in recent days — an inadvertent recording of a Brown strategy session in which an unidentified person suggests portraying Whitman as a "whore" for creating a loophole in her pension plan to appeal to public safety unions that were endorsing her in the governor's race.Moderator Tom Brokaw, the former NBC anchorman, told Brown that the word represents, to many women, the same sort of insult that "the N-word" represents to African Americans.
Brown at first said he did not agree with the comparison — a statement that drew an audible reproach from the crowd — and sought to question the timing of the release of the "5-week-old private conversation … with garbled transmission."
"I will say the campaign apologized promptly and I'm affirming that apology tonight," he said.
"You're repeating it to Ms. Whitman?" Brokaw asked.
"Yes, I am," Brown said. "It's unfortunate. I'm sorry it happened. I apologize."
Whitman, however, told Brown that Californians "deserve better than slurs and personal attacks."
"I think every Californian, and especially women, know exactly what's going on here and that is a deeply offensive term to women," she said.
Brown asked Whitman if she had similarly chastised her campaign chairman, former Gov. Pete Wilson, who used the same term in a criticism of Congress.
"You know better than that, Jerry; that is a completely different thing," she said, a retort that drew another rumble of reaction from the crowd. "The fact that you are defending your campaign for a slur and a personal attack on me — it's not befitting of California, it's not befitting of the office that you are running for."
Brown apologized a third time, and said that the utterance "does not represent anything other than things that happen in campaigns." But, he pointedly added, Whitman had received police endorsements after exempting safety officials from key parts of her pension reform plan — which he had refused to do.
"You got the endorsement of that union, I didn't, because they said I'd be too tough on unions and public employee pensions, and I'll take that," Brown said.
"I got that endorsement because that union knows that I will be tough on crime," Whitman replied. "And Jerry Brown has a 40-year record of being soft on crime."
The debate which aired on NBC stations, followed a tumultuous several weeks for the candidates, who faced controversies over the slur by the unidentified Brown associate and revelations that Whitman had employed an illegal immigrant as a housekeeper for nine years.
The latter issue came up only briefly toward the end of the debate, with Whitman asserting that her experience showed the need for a better verification system and Brown calling for a "human" response to handling the millions of illegal immigrants now in the country.
Apart from the confrontation over the taped conversation, the debate followed the contours of the long race for governor, now three weeks away from a decision. Brown cast himself as a candidate who could bring to the governor's office an experienced sense of how the state functions. Whitman cast herself as the outsider with what she called a "common sense" approach.
Brown tried to strike at her intentions early, though, when he turned a question about the impact of Proposition 13, the 1978 property tax relief measure, into an indictment of Whitman's plan to eradicate the state's capital gains tax.”



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 17:40 on October 13th, 2010
I'am a hospital health care worker and have to belong to a union SEIU. The union sends out expensive political fliers to it's members, of course to vote for Democrates, Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer. So, less educated union members and will follow along not really knowing the issues and vote for what the union tells them. Jerry Brown didn't do it right the first time he was govenor and his dad wasn't any better. Because of these flier I vote for the opposit. So, I asked where is the money coming from to pay for these expensive politcal flier, my union doesn't know. I hope my union dues aren't paying for it, unfortunatly it probably does. Union dues are to help out it's members and be available as a strick fund. The money wasn't there when we had gone on strick in the past. These unions are all corrupt and and so are politicians. We need to have a business minded person to take over and HELP California before all industry and people leave and California is taken over by Mexico.