American Employment Skewed Toward White Collar, Clerical, Health

by Rory Cripps | December 22, 2010 at 10:21 am
349 views | 19 Recommendations | 9 comments

Videos

Wall Street must pay for mistakes

see larger video

sourced by Rory Cripps

Wall Street must pay for mistakes

Photos

American Employment Skewed Toward White Collar, Clerical, Health

American Employment Skewed Toward White Collar, Clerical, Health

see larger image

uploaded by Rory Cripps

The American economy in its present form is unsustainable. Indeed it's a false economy--a voodoo economy--based on thin paper and false hopes and promises. Every month, throughout the past three years, American consumers and businesses spent an average of $523 billion more on products and services from overseas than they did on American products and services. And the only job sectors that have maintained unemployment levels well below the national unemployment rate are white-collar, temporary clerical, government, health, and education. 

The average unemployment rate since the end of the recession and through Nov. 2010 was 9.7 percent. In the month of November, the unemployment rate was 9.8 percent. During that same period, the average combined unemployment rate for white-collar professions, which include banking, finance, securities, and insurance, was 5.8 percent. Health care workers averaged 5.9 percent and government workers averaged 4.3 percent. The construction industry averaged 19.8 percent, the manufacturing industry 11.3 percent, and the durable goods industry averaged 12.1 percent. During that time, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose slightly and fell slightly. The GDP is a measure of all goods and services produced in the United States whether the goods are produced by American or foreign owned companies.

There are now "officially" over 15 million Americans unemployed. However that amount significantly understates the actual unemployment numbers by millions, because unemployed workers are dropped from the "official" final unemployment count every month. The 15 million that are counted as unemployed have been unemployed for an average of 8 months. That is the highest average duration of unemployment since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began compiling those statistics. Moreover, since 1948 we haven't seen numbers anywhere close to that. We did however see those kind of numbers during the Great Depression which occurred throughout the 1930s and up through WWII.

Since the recession was declared officially over in June 2009, America has experienced an average net job loss of over 86,000 per month. In order to bring the unemployment rate down within the next two years to 5 percent (which is considered by many economists to be a "full employment level"), it will require the creation of at least 450 to 500 thousand new jobs every month beginning in January 2011.

America experienced a major recession in the early 80s during the Reagan Administration. The recession was severe and prolonged because the Federal Reserve put the breaks on the economy in order to reign in the inflationary spiral that occurred during that time. That recession began in July 81 and was declared over in Nov. 82. The unemployment rate at the beginning of the recession was 7.2 percent. It took until June 1984 before the unemployment rate went back down to 7.2 percent. During that time, substantial net job gains only started occurring in March 1983 at the average rate of 400,000 per month and totaled over 6 million.

America's last recession was declared officially over in June 2009. Since June 2009, the average monthly job growth has been minus 86,000. In other words, we haven't experienced any net job gains for the 18 month period beginning June 2009 and ending Nov. 2010. It's true that in some months during that period jobs were added. However it's now 18 months later and we still haven't made up for the 1.5 million jobs that were lost during that time let alone make up for half of the 15 million workers that remain unemployed as well as the 100,000-plus new monthly entrants to the American workforce.

Unless we start seeing positive job growth in the neighborhood of 200,000 to 300,000 consistently and without fail every month, we're not even beginning to get out of the unemployment woods. We've got a serious long term unemployment problem here in America and the Bureau of Labor Statistics understates the problem by millions every month in its "Employment Situation Summary".

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
"thirty-aught-six"

We're skewed man!

2
Rory Cripps

Yes! No doubt about it! The American economy is saturated with it on a stick. Gonna take many years for it to dry up if it ever does. A lot of disinfectant is gonna be needed too. If I were you, I'd start buying disinfectant futures now before the price goes up. BTW: What's the current average PE ratio on stocks . . .about a million to one?

2
"thirty-aught-six"

Go national with a fast food franchise or become a barista at your local cafe.  The service industry opens the world of opportunity.  Manufacturing isn't pc or eco-friendly. For gosh sakes, anyone who would do foundry work would eat meat. LOL.

2
nanute

Rory, Have you considered nursing school? lol. Current PE ratio for S&P 500 for the current decade is 27.9. Almost double the ratio in the 1930's. Does this mean we are twice as likely to experience another GD?

1
Rory Cripps

nanute: I have faith in the American capitalist/free market to do the right thing! Especially when the majority of the American economy is based on paper shuffling which bears no intrinsic value. I've heard that in 1929 the PE ratio was 32.6 and prior to that there was a collapse in the real estate market. A market crash certainly has a way of driving the PE ratio down.

1
Clotee Allochuku

As long as America sends jobs and millions of dollars over seas, we will continue to be in a recession. Have you counted the number of foreign cars on our roads lately? How many of our goods and services are manufactured in foreign countries? Now, the farms are moving south to Mexico! What next?

1
Rory Cripps

Thirty: In case anyone gets the wrong impression, I'm not necessarily implying that America needs to rely on manufacturing to bolster its economy. What I am saying is that manufacturing was one of those industries that paid its workers enough of a wage that would ultimately give them a good shot of entering the ranks of the middle-middle class. The same applies to the construction industry. Both of these industries suffered much more than the paper-shuffling industries that have recently been employing millions of temporary clerical workers who receive no benefits. Industries by the way that were largely responsible for creating the financial meltdown and consequent high and prolonged unemployment rates.

1
"thirty-aught-six"

Manufacturing is what America needs to get back to.  Until then we can't and whine about our stores selling products made in China, or some other country, other than products made in America. Americans are going to have to accept less and do more until we become competitive. We've won the race to the bottom. Now we have to work our way back to the top rung again. Hopefully we wont give it all away next time.

1
YankeeJim

On this note I am in violent agreement with thirty-aught-six and Rory Cripps. Send resumes and I will start something in the new year -- something that I deaf guy can do accompanied by throngs of ears who can also communicate.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Piobar
First Flagged at 11:33 AM, Dec 22, 2010 by Piobar
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (19)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from