American forces start ground assaults in Pakistan

by Sanjay Jha | September 11, 2008 at 01:44 am
453 views | 19 Recommendations | 15 comments

After starting air strike inside Pakistan airspace now US led NATO forces have started ground assault. The ground assault has also been accompanied by stepped up air attacks by unmanned Predator drones almost every day that have killed scores of people.

American are using  new techniques to hunt terrorists more effectively. American has intensified its focus more on Pakistan after Democratic nominee Barack Obama has called for the same.

The United States and Pakistan are all but on the brink of a one-sided war, following President Bush authorizing ground assaults inside the country and Pakistan’s army chief Pervez Kiyani threatening to repulse any attack on its territory.

In swift moving developments, the US President has begun to move the focus of the seven-year old war on terror from Iraq back to the Afghan-Pakistan theatre, and in the process put Washington’s notional ally on notice over its inaction and/or covert support to terrorist elements.

In a speech at the National Defense University on Tuesday, Bush stopped short of calling Pakistan a terrorist state, while nominally saying it remained an ally. He warned that ''extremists are increasingly using Pakistan as a base from which to destabilize Afghanistan's young democracy.''

''Defeating these terrorist and extremists is in Pakistan's interest... also Pakistan's responsibility -- because every nation has an obligation to govern its own territory and make certain that it does not become a safe haven for terror,'' Bush said, in the starkest indictment of Washington’s waning ally. Some US officials have said Pakistan has not only failed to act against terrorism, but promoted it, including last month's attack on the Indian Embassy in Kabul.

In fact, for the first time, Bush identified ''parts of Pakistan'' as a separate component in the war on terror, distinct from Afghanistan, with which it was hitherto hyphenated. ''Each of these three places I've discussed today -- Iraq, Afghanistan, and parts of Pakistan -- pose unique challenges for our country,'' he said.

The reason for Bush’s grim denunciation became apparent a few hours after his speech when the New York Times reported that he secretly approved orders in July that for the first time allow American Special Operations forces to carry out ground assaults inside Pakistan without the prior approval from Islamabad.

The order was confirmed publicly by Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen who told a Congressional hearing that he was ''looking at a new, more comprehensive strategy for the region'' that would cover ''both sides'' of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Mullen’s remark also corroborated a new policy that was evident on the ground last week when American Navy Seals, part of the Special Operations Forces, swept into Pakistan in an air-borne attack to take out terrorists. Some two dozen people were killed. The raid caused outrage in Pakistan, which said civilians, including women and children, were killed.

There was no immediate official confirmation -– or denial -- from Washington about the ground assault, until much later when unnamed officials acknowledged the raid and signalled a change in US policy. The gloves were off against Pakistan.

The new policy evidently involves accepting some collateral damage if intelligence inputs point to confirmed terrorist presence.

Washington’s changed policy re-directing the war on terror on Pakistan brought forth a huffy response from Islamabad where army chief Kiyani vowed to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country at all costs and insisted no external force is allowed to conduct operations inside Pakistan.

But the statement appeared to be made more for public consumption and saving face considering the Pakistan’s parlous condition -- its economy has virtually collapsed -- and Washington’s unforgiving mood. ''The situation in the tribal areas is not tolerable,'' one official was quoted as saying. ''We have to be more assertive. Orders have been issued.''
recommend This comment thread is now closed
Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:00 on September 11th, 2008

Sanjay Jha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Iraq, Afghanistan, Now Pakistan next Iran, maybe India to become a US target as well soon for not complying with their Demands on Nuclear Ideas? What are they thinking?

Enough all ready. 

0
Fairbanks

>next Iran, maybe India to become a US target.

Pakistan has been a challenge as far as government is concerned.  Musharraf had a degree of success in managing the factions, but he is the rare person capable of symploke.  Without him the usual institutions of Dept of Sledgehammer and Dept of Crowbar are the most effective.  Russia runs Iran, no problem, and India manages itself, not easy, no USDoS and USDoC required. 

0
CJaye

With an attitude like yours American people don't have a chance do they?

0
Frank Fortune

It's about time: just seven years too late. Pakistan is the global epicentre of jihad and the government has colluded with AQ to help them and harbour them. It is time to go in to Pakistan and clean the place up. 

0
hussain

Frank Fortune, I think the Americans should elect you as president so that you could put the last nail in the coffin of the US because Mr Bush could not do so in two stints in the office.

0
Emilio Lizardo

You know, this is a perfect example of why American politics, and in fact American Democracy itself has now become completely irrelevant.

Individuals, such as Mr. Fortune here, who see a person up on a stage someplace in front of a lot of microphones, wearing an impressive military uniform with lots of shiny little medals pinned onto his breast - and they just believe everything they're told ... partly due to just plain laziness, but mostly due to fear ...

The man wearing the impressive uniform says the enemy hides in Pakistan, or in Iraq, or Iran, or wherever ... always somewhere else ... and all those poor citizens who've never learned to look with their own eyes and form their own judgements, like so many sheep to the slaughter, follow right along ...

This isn't Democracy - like the old saying goes, 'A fool and his money are soon parted,' one might also say, 'Stealing democracy from a nation of sheep is like taking candy from a baby' ...

0
René

Tell that to the innocent people of Kashmir who have been terrorized, killed and forced out by Pakistani invaders.

0
hussain

Perhaps, you do not know much about Kashmir. Pakistani forces are not killing people there but around 700,000 Indian troopos are busy in massacre of Kashmiri people because they are demanding right to self-determination in accordance with the UN resolutions adopted more than five decades ago.

0
Emilio Lizardo

The Moslem world is not interested in a western lifestyle, Rene ...

It has now come to war.

It has now come to the Moslem women acting as bombers to protect their way of life ...

Do you understand what is next ?

Tell that to your grandchildren ...

0
hussain

Mr Jha, it is still premature that "new techniques to hunt terrorists more effectively" that according to you are being adopted by the Americans are to work. The US is not hunting down the alleged terrorists rather it is compelling more peace-loving people to pick up arms and start fighting, which is not a good thing for the global peace.

What do you think about the situation in the region if Pakistani forces retaliate any US incursion in future? Do you know Pakistan is neither Iraq nor Taliban government of Afghanistan. If it can take on the erstwhile Soviet Union to serve the US interests, it can easily drive the foreigners out from Afghanistan. But we all in the region should pray that time should not come because it may lead to a disastrous war that would not serve any purpose but annihilate various states.

0
Sanjay Jha

Hi Hussain, Thanks very much for your comment. I appreciate it. I wrote after reading it in several places. Basically Americans are replicating the success of new techniques adopted in Iraq. I do agree with you that If they target innocent peace loving people then they would be in much more problem. In this war on terror innocent people should not be targeted. Otherwise USA will have whole nation to fight.

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:11 on September 11th, 2008

Sanjay Jha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

voiceforpeace
voiceforpeace
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:01 on September 11th, 2008

Sanjay Jha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Heritage

Americans are using  new techniques to hunt terrorists more effectively....... Unfortunately the end result will be hundreds (thousands?) of dead and injured civilians....new techniques same results.....

Christina 123
Christina 123
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:44 on September 11th, 2008

Sanjay Jha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from