NP Rank:
Analysis: Obama , Acorn, and the National Civilian Corps
" So, ACORN will be cast on the ever increasing political ash heap amassed by the Obama Administration, not because they didn’t perform, but because they became a liability and because they became unusable for future endeavors. "
~Frank Salvato, Why Obama will throw ACORN under the bus
I think I am beginning, finally, to understand Barack Obama. I happened upon an analysis called "Why Obama will throw ACORN under the Bus" but what really peaked by interest was the bit about the civilian national security force.
The author, Frank Salvato, thinks this force will consist of labor unions, for purely political reasons. This clears up much of the other speculation and various stories surrounding this controversial issue. Obama's core, consolidated support is comprised of labor union members; hence, that is where the power and his interest will lie. That is the wedge he will drive in to transform the nation.
Michael Moore has noted that left-wing, organized labor trust Obama, and this trust is returned. Randy Shaw at LA Progressive has said that Obama seemed fully at home when meeting with union people last week in Pittsburgh at the AFL-CIO rally. He spent an inordinate of time shaking hands with them, and seemed truly to be at his most relaxed and congenial here. The reciprocal nature of the mood was apparent.
I had long been wondering what Obama's real agenda was, regarding the National Civilian Security Task Force. This piece enlightened me. What the author charges is that Obama is first and foremost a politician in the Chicago model of the term, and adheres to its rules and agendas. This may sound cynical, but from the pragmatist's point of view, it is ok just so long as it finds solutions which really work, and are adjusted to the actual circumstances.
Do you remember all that talk by Mr. Obama about a civilian national security force?“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
The key words in that passage are “achieve the national security objectives.” While everyone else was focusing on the dichotomy of our US military and a civilian counterpart, the real focus should have been on the definition of what Mr. Obama believes to be our “national security objectives.”
Let’s take the aforementioned quote and put it into context by incorporating this quote by Mr. Obama:
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
As we have witnessed over the past eight months, Mr. Obama has quite the different vision of what is and what isn’t important where the well-being of our nation is concerned. Therefore, his idea of what comprises our “national security objectives” is also quite different from what we have come to expect and understand. Truth be told, this above average Chicago machine politician has coalesced his need to consolidate power with the implementation of his agenda, facilitated by a mostly manufactured mortgage crisis and a perceived economic crisis, into a marketable set of new age national security objectives.
In the Stimulus Package Mr. Obama effectively raided the US Treasury to reward a plethora of special interest groups. If the intent of the almost trillion dollar stimulus package was to create jobs and kick-start the economy why then were millions and in some cases billions spent on:
- The San Francisco Salt March Mouse
- A magnetically levitating train line from Disneyland to Las Vegas
- Lithium battery research
- Zero emissions power plants & carbon capture projects
- Amtrak
- The National Endowment for the Arts
- “Global warming” research (even as temperatures continue to fall)
- Digital television conversion
- Medicaid
- Unemployment benefits, food stamps & earned income credits
. . . What is unquestionable about the Stimulus Bill is that in each of the instances where a special interest was served – this group is dominated by eco-zealots and unions – an Obama supportive voter block was rewarded for their campaign efforts. With much of the $825 billion yet to be spent, it isn’t hard to understand that the bulk of this “embezzlement” will be allocated to Obama supportive groups just prior to the 2010 and 2012 elections.
. . . What is unquestionable about the Stimulus Bill is that in each of the instances where a special interest was served – this group is dominated by eco-zealots and unions – an Obama supportive voter block was rewarded for their campaign efforts. With much of the $825 billion yet to be spent, it isn’t hard to understand that the bulk of this “embezzlement” will be allocated to Obama supportive groups just prior to the 2010 and 2012 elections.
But with or without ACORN, Mr. Obama, the quintessential Chicago machine politician, is well on his way to adhering to the machines cardinal rules. He has attained elected office. He has consolidated power. He has rewarded his minions. And he is positioning for re-election.
Do you remember when I mentioned Mr. Obama’s quote about the “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded?” Have you figured out just who and/or what organizations the “force” is comprised of yet?
Here’s a hint: “…just look for the union label…”
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 12:53 on September 27th, 2009
Yes, exactly what I thought: what are the national security objectives?
There has been a decided over-reaction to right-wing extremism in the Obama administration and by his supporters in the media and elsewhere.
I base my conjecture on how that came to be on the nature of projection. That is what happens when we overestimate the evil, the threat, of others in some kind of direct proportion to the underestimation of our own evil and our own threat to them.
If the "national security objectives" are of such an extreme nature, very self-serving to one side of the political community, being based on projection, then meeting the "security objectives" will cause great domestic unrest, including violence.
Even pondering violent opposition to one's goals will further harden the reaction in anticipation of the need to meet that exigency.
Backing all that up you have an interesting take on the nature of the stimulus plan. I will try to find it, but it is said that a group, the Apollo Alliance, actually wrote the bill and many of the more radical czars under Obama were either on or from that group.
Debate: O'Reilly and Glen Beck on "communists". No confirmation about Harry Reid statement on who wrote the stimulus bill.
So, we can infer that "there is method in the madness".
SMK, sounds as if you are contemplating "taking a walk on the wild side" and doing a 180 on your orientation.
at 15:29 on September 27th, 2009
right wing conservatives should all band together with glenn beck and o'reilly to send this idiot back to chicago!!!!
at 17:31 on September 27th, 2009
They have no mercy on us ...