Anti Public Arts Funding = Hitler?

by eastvanray | August 27, 2008 at 10:07 pm
447 views | 0 Recommendations | 6 comments

It seems that the Looney Left has taken leave of their senses.  First it Madonna comparing McCain to Hitler and Mugabe now left-wing nutjob artists are comparing Harper to Hitler.  Clearly our much lauded puiblic education system failed to teach these human turds anything about history.  Comments like these only serve to illustrate the stupidity of those who oppose PM Harper on this issue.  One things is for certain, I was on the fence on cuts to the arts and now I fully support them! 

 

Harper compared to Hitler
By Sylvain Larocque, THE CANADIAN PRESS


Area arts groups protest against the Harper government's plans to cut a number of programs aimed at helping the artistic community, including the program that helped Canadian artists promote their work abroad, in Montreal, Wednesday, Aug.27, 2008.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Peter McCabe

 

MONTREAL - Opposition politicians attending a rally blasting cuts to federal arts spending quickly distanced themselves Wednesday from remarks by one speaker linking Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler.

Hundreds of Quebec singers, actors, dancers and writers gathered in a Montreal square to condemn nearly $45 million in funding cuts announced recently by the Conservative government.

The artists accused the government of trying to "censor" artists and running counter to trends in the rest of the world.

But then composer Walter Boudreau delivered a blisteringly sarcastic speech from the stage about the intentions of the federal government and concluded it by shouting, "Heil Hitler."

A couple of people in the crowd also hoisted signs marked with the Second World War-era swastika which branded the Nazis.

Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe, as well as NDP MP Thomas Mulcair and Liberal Denis Coderre were all at the rally and later denounced the gestures.


"These comparisons are totally unacceptable and take credibility away from the very real objections made about these cuts," Mulcair said in a telephone interview.

Coderre said the incident will create a diversion that will be exploited by the Conservatives.

"I can understand the frustration," Coderre said. "But there are limits that must not be crossed."

Duceppe echoed the concerns. He had compared Harper to authoritarian Quebec premier Maurice Duplessis in his speech.

"We must not go too far," he said.

B'nai Brith Canada also criticized the incident, calling for "civilized political discourse as Canadians gear up for what is expected to be a fall election."

"The comparison of Canada's prime minister to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler is obscene and offensive," said Frank Dimant, the group's executive vice-president, in a statement.

"Such statements trivialize the Holocaust and inject ugly rhetoric in what ought to be reasoned debate on real and pressing political issues."

The incident cast a shadow on what had otherwise been a successful rally that drew a number of heavyweights from the Quebec arts scene, including Montreal International Jazz Festival co-founder Andre Menard and noted writer Michel Tremblay.

"We must wonder about the sincerity of a government that recognizes the people of Quebec as a nation when it does not hesitate to cut into the very heart of its existence - culture," said film producer Denise Robert.

"In addition to ensuring the financial stability of dozens of organizations across Canada, the financial support of government facilitates the collection of private donations which, in turn, can promote production here and abroad," she added. "We attract international investment in culture."

The demonstration was organized by Culture Montreal and the Montreal arts council.

Ottawa announced the cuts during the last few weeks and they include the elimination or reduction of some programs judged crucial by the arts community.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Sputnic

Comparing people to hitler can be seen as an insult his victims and shouldnt be done lightly. The Thatcher government here in the UK (1979 - 90) was absurdly right wing also and cut arts funding in an effort to limit free thinking it partially worked. Be under on illusion as to the motivation behind such cutbacks

0
Leopold Butters Stotch

What is most ironic is that if these artists had studued history as opposed to art, they'd know that part of Hitler's dream was for the Reich to become the centre of art and culture in the world. Operas, symphonies, art museums and the like were at the heart of his demented plan. In fact, before the he became a dictator, he wanted to be an artist, but failed in that career. In essence, comparing Harper to Hitler on the basis/theory that cutting art funding is what Hitler would do only highlights the stupidity of these artists. Artists are more like Hitler than Harper. They, like Hitler, support the arts or aspire to be artists.

0
minspir

Why does the government have to fund failed artists? The 'art' should sell on it's own merit, regardless of what type of art it is. If it doesn't, maybe the artists should find another way to make a living instead of looking for handouts. Why should the tax payer subsidize a performance troupe, that is performing in an empty theatre, because no one is interested in what they are doing?

0
eastvanray

Bravo!  I agree 100%

0
Jordan Yerman

Do you want Canada to have its own film industry, or would you rather we continue to exist as an extension of craft services for our neighbors to the south? You cannot seriously discuss public funding for the arts without addressing film: Canada is doing very poorly indeed at promoting home-grown efforts at the only art form with a mass-market potential. A film set employs a lot of people, and churns a great deal of money through the economy. Do we really want to be at the mercy of Los Angeles and the US dollar, waiting for the next Hollywood production to take a field trip to Vancouver, or retool Yonge Street as Broadway? I, for one, say no.

0
eastvanray

I do not believe that taxpayers should have to fund something that produces private profits.  That is what the market is for.  If Canadians do not want to consume this "art" then it is not fair to force them to pay for it through their taxes.  We have a health care system in shambles and I believe that should take priority over funding what amounts to entertainment.  I am a patron of Canadian arts.  I attend Canadian films, plays, concerts and gallaries - that should be the extent of my financial committment.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from