Anti-'Stalking' Journo Gets (Pending) Justice on Stalking Charge

Vic:

The referees always manage to see the retaliatory actions provoked from my favorite pro football guy and never that of the instigator(s).  Sometimes, the "reactions" do not even qualify as "retaliatory", or are less aggrievious than those of the troublemaker(s).  I hate when that happens, because it reminds me of the "responsibility diffusion" mechanism inherent in all types of organized  stalking. 

I would certainly lend a hand, if I could, for your legal defense.  Unfortunately my position is not very liquid, at the moment.  Isn't that the case with all or most of us?

Maybe you could put up a Paypal button, and start a "fair cause defense" fund for this purpose?    You'd probably be well advised to check the TOS agreement of NP before doing so.

Allowing the one journalist who would break rank with the "dark corner" authoritarians to be disallowed the benefit of the "fair shake" that is theoretically available to all of us (on constitutional grounds) would set very poorly with me.

Vic, I thank you for putting forth this information in such a critically well thought out way. While I interpret a couple of your responses as irregular, your stories hit the nail on the head, much better than many TI's material that I have read. Good luck Vic. I truly wish you the best, you are in my prayers.

So Vic, since you're soliciting legal defense for your case, wouldn't it be appropriate to elaborate on the events of that evening here? (other than what happened while you were being arrested)

Vic, sorry to hear you are up the creek without a paddle yet again.

Just wanted to let you know that I have been heavily zapped myself the past week or so. Are they testing the "directed energy weapons" on full power again? The tone of the ear ringing has changed often and in a very notable manner. It does make one feel like total shyte. Ah, but isn't that just an Auditory Hallucination, you say? Noticed a couple of the Führer's assault troop squads getting restless too.

You know what they say - you can't fight the police state. So, throw yourself on the mercy of the court and they might give you a nice comfortable upper bunk in the Fema camp nearest you. I know, I know, 10k for a good defense/offense is nothing to a high roller like you - but it would save you some money.

It seems to me that you should google "superlawyers" in Washington D.C.  to find a lawyer who'd take your case "pro bono."  It seems to me that the Washington Superlawyers have already heard about this extrajudicial, criminal, stalking system; and they'll be happy to go after the US Gov's criminal activity in a suit for a client with the right data. If the superlawyers make it a class action suit that promises to award informant-stalkers a chunk of the gains, they'd get all the data they need.

A Superlawyer might be able to show that the local police were prejudiced against you and your complaint, because your name was entered into the completely unreliable (GIGO) "stalk-ee" database created by the incompetent Feds who could not prevent the Twin Towers or find WMD in Iraq. A Washington Superlawyer, with a track record of dealing with government incompetence and illegality, probably knows a way of finding out if your local police department is plugged into the federally funded, gangstalking, extrajudicial punishment and torture network.

When the US leaves Iraq, as we will, who will gain from our war?. It will be Iran. In other words, our Dear Leaders made 4,000 patriotic soldiers die to fight a war that created a stronger Iran. Iraq is mostly Shia and so is Iran; both countries will end up working together to become a greater threat in the Mideast. The presence of the so-called biological weapons was a trumped up pretext for invading a country that was not a threat to us. Saddam kept a power balance in the region; Iran was afraid of him. Do you get it? We wasted billions on destroying Iraq, while ignoring al Qaeda, which was, and remains, a real threat to the US that wants to nuke our cities. As for those terrible biological weapons that you think we had to destroy -- Terry McVeigh managed to find them at WalMart.

To find out some of the real reasons we went to war in Iraq,  read Honorable John Hostettler's book, "Nothing for the Nation." Congressman Hostettler served on the House Intelligence Committee, so he just might know more than you do about the behind-the-scenes reasons for going to war. 

You've got to wake up, batvette, the world is not the way you think it is.

BTW, Hostettler had a chair on the Armed Services committee, not Select Intelligence, but let me show you an excerpt from his website which shows obvious indication his book, if not his original opposition to the war, is clearly motivated for political aspirations:

As one of six Republicans in the United States House of Representatives (the House) who voted against the October 2002 resolution to allow the president to invade Iraq, I believe the Iraq invasion is a precedent that conservatives, specifically, and Americans, in general, will come to regret one day. Given the probability of a progressive Democrat victory in the race for the White House in 2008, that day is likely closer than we think. The reason for the likelihood is progressivism by definition finds new justification for government action of all sorts. Why would we think the exercise of military action is immune from this evolutionary approach to public policy? It follows that what conservatives, specifically, and even Americans in general may consider is not a proper justification of expenditure of blood and treasure tomorrow may be entirely in keeping with the next cause de jour for the future President Clinton or President Obama or President Edwards, etc. Any conservative opposition to a progressive commander-in-chief's military foray will undoubtedly be answered with quotations uttered during the build up to and execution of the Iraq conflict. These quotations would be supplied from the floor speeches of prominent Republican congressmen and senators or similarly related passages from the transcripts of conservative radio-talk-show hosts.

He knows sucking up to anti-war liberals will be key to ever winning his seat back that he lost in 2006, or a Senate position he is rumoured to be eyeing in 2010.

His original opposition is that Saddam wasn't an "immediate threat" to the United States physical security, and you might notice I never once claimed he was. He was a regional threat, and  in a region including five nations which between them have two thirds of the world's proven conventional petroleum reserves, when the US has to import two thirds of its daily 21 million barrels for its very existence, that makes him a threat to our national security that was too dangerous to be allowed to rearm- never mind the as described threat to the dollar and our economy.

Furthermore Hostettler is a staunch pro-lifer......  who walks around with a loaded Glock in his briefcase, and tries to get on commercial airline flights with it.  LOL, really, just LOL.

The irresistible target, as you put it, should have been placed in Saudi Arabia -- the ones who flew the planes into the Twin Towers. You're easily duped cannon fodder, batvette. You're one of the robots whofall for the lies that the politicians use to send them to battle.

Vic, if what you say about your arrest is true, as a victim of this crap, you were convicted *before* you were arrested.

I say if you are a real victim, good luck to you, you'll need it.

I have almost since the beginning referred to this as the vampire routine.  The perps commit the crime and blame the target.  This strategy is indicated in the methodology of either mobbing or psychological harassment, I don't remember which.  I had seen a movie in which the criminal shot himself and blamed it on the innocent person.  In my situation, the anchors involved, had managed to arrive at locations before me.  Recently, at my bank there was actually a look alike of an anchor.  She was standing in front of the building -- just standing -- which has been the case in a multitude of situations including the post office (computer monitoring).  I don't know where they find these people - they most conduct casting calls.  In the literature it indicates that the targets moves are known -- probably partially via  the continuous 24/7 surveillance, wire tape, computer hacking and electronic surveillance.  My situation also involves extensive use of cell phones to harass me -- I found an interesting piece on criminal codes and the use of cell phones in this manner.  I'll try to email it to you.  I've sent you several emails -- at this time even my Facebook page has been corrupted.  I'm also finding physical symptoms -- talcum powder taste and other physical manifestations occurring. 

If you can win the first part of this action, you may be able to take action for personal injury for emotional distress, etc.  A good personal injury attorney can be helpful? 

Some of the recent posters are painting TIs as mentally ill, just as our stalkers would have it.

The fact of the matter is that we are not mentally ill, but have been aggressively and expertly gaslighted by our tormentors to the point that some of us would readily believe that we are, in fact, mentally ill. Some of us have probably sought psychological help because of the gas lighting, never realizing what was really going on.

The torture matrix, as Vic calls it, has been set up throughout the land. Every establishment where people congregate is a potential hot spot where the brownshirt stormtroopers can assault their targets. It has been my experience that supermarkets are one of the brownshirts very favorite sniping spots.

Make no mistake about it, when checkout personnel are instructed to verbally harass certain customer TIs in the checkout lines, we in this country have what amounts to an underground, illicit, illegal, extra-judicial correctional system. The system is totally corrupt. But the harassment and torment does not end in the checkout lines, it extends into our homes, where our phones provide open microphones, via Echelon, for corrupt government personnel to eavesdrop on.

I have had my phone conversations later recited by agents at various locations, as part of their harassment protocol. Make no mistake, they wanted me to know that they were, in fact, reciting my earlier conversation. This eavesdropping system has been in operation for a long time.

Okay Batvette, now I'm going to go watch a Clockwork Orange - I know that's some of your favorite pornography.