Anyone use AOL anymore?

by YankeeJim | February 7, 2011 at 04:32 am
344 views | 2 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Arianna Huffington | Photo 02

Arianna Huffington | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

It was a beautiful concept in the beginning, America, online. Wow, let’s make a movie, “You’ve got mail.”

I was hooked. I couldn’t do without it. I was a founding member and long time user, and then I felt abused. They began falling behind.

Tired of the automatic fee, I dropped it and went for free.

So, why is anyone using AOL?

Arianna Huffington went for broke and sold out to AOL. She is now the content manager. What does it mean beside AOL having a new accent?

“Huffington Post agrees to $315 million buyout from AOL

By Paul Farhi

Washington Post Staff Writer 
Monday, February 7, 2011; 2:00 AM

Huffington Post, the liberal-leaning online news site that has been one of the Internet's start-up success stories, said it agreed to a $315 million buyout late Sunday night from AOL Inc., the elder statesman of online access and digital content.

Huffington Post founder Arianna Huffington, who made the announcement on her site Sunday night, will become president and editor in chief the Huffington Post Media Group, which will put the news outlet she co-founded under the same ownership as AOL's collection of sites. Huffington - the former wife of one-time Republican Senate candidate Michael Huffington - has evolved into a well-known pundit and author, and a powerful player in Democratic circles as a result of her venture.

In a stroke, AOL greatly expands its content offerings and reach on the Internet, part of its strategy to move away from selling the dial-up service that gave millions of Americans their first online experiences, but which is now in grave decline.

Huffington Post reaches more than 20 million unique visitors each month, making it one of the most popular news and commentary sites on the Internet. It is based in New York City, as is AOL.

Huffington and Huffington Post chairman Kenneth Lerer co-founded the site in 2005 and presided over its rapid growth. "HuffPo" said it turned a profit in 2010, but as a private company it does not publicly report its sales and earnings.

The companies said Sunday that about $300 million of the sale price will be in cash, with the balance in AOL stock - a spectacular return for Huffington Post, which was founded on a $1 million investment less than six years ago. It is privately owned by its two co-founders, as well as a group of investors.

AOL, which began in the Washington area but long ago moved its headquarters to New York, has been gradually moving out of its deflating Internet-access business and transforming itself into an online content machine. In addition to its eponymous website, AOL owns a series of well-known digital brands, including MapquestPolitics Daily, the pop-culture news site PopEater, movie-news and ticket reservation service Moviefone, and the tech-news and review sites Engadget and TechCrunch. It also owns Patch.com, a network of "hyper-local" news sites covering dozens of communities across the country, including several in the Washington area.

But AOL continues to decline as its access business shrinks and its content strategy ramps up. During the fourth quarter, its overall revenue fell 26 percent to $596 million, with advertising sales off 29 percent to $332 million. It is now an independent company, having unwound an ill-fated merger with Time Warner in 2000. AOL formally separated from Time Warner in 2009.

All told, the new group said it will have a combined base of 117 million unique visitors a month in the U.S. and 270 million around the world.

Huffington indicated in a posting that the merger came together quickly. AOL chairman and chief executive Tim Armstrong e-mailed her last month "saying he had something he wanted to discuss with me, and asking when we could meet." The next day over lunch at Huffington's house in Los Angeles, Armstrong and Arthur Minson, AOL's chief financial officer, offered to buy Huffington Post.

The deal was signed on Sunday at the Super Bowl in Dallas, where Huffington and Armstrong met again.

"The Huffington Post will continue on the same path we have been on for the last six years - though now at light speed - by combining with AOL," she wrote. "... We are fusing a legendary and powerful new media brand with a vibrant, innovative news organization."

The merger will put the Huffington Post into local journalism via Patch, and expand its video offerings via AOL's video studios in New York and Los Angeles.”

 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
Guinevere

What it means is that Huffington "sold out" her principles for cash.  The deep pockets of the Surveillance State have just bought out one of the State's only online critics of any clout. The Surveillance State told Huffington she would continue to have control of the content.  Not so.  Those who OWN the paper will control the content. Huffington will end up leaving the aol company shortly after discovering (if she did not already suspect) the truth.

0
YankeeJim

Sold out, yes.

"Surveillance state," now that's a concept. What do you have in mind?

No vigilance and attention to prospective illegal entry, terrorist attacks, subversive communities of terror.

Surveillance of borders is a good thing. Surveillance of suspected domains of terror and crime, is a good thing.

Having laws and regulations governing the use of surveillance by all levels and departments of government is a good thing.

Got something to hide?



1
Guinevere

"Got something to hide?"  That's the argument that the sheeple always use to excuse the x-rays at airports these days. They say, "I've got nothing to hide -- if it keeps us safe."  But there's surveillance and then there's surveillance.  Scanning a traveler's body parts with rays that are cumulatively toxic -- forcing travelers to submit to a frisk at the hands of highschool dropouts -- in the name of security is a travesty of the Bill of Rights. If you think it's only a matter of not having anything to hide, the next time a policeman stops you for speeding, get out of your car and strip your clothes off to prove to him that you aren't carrying any weapons, whydoncha?  If you can't distinguish between our Government's protecting US borders (a failed attempt by the way) and our Government's massive invasion of the privacy of US citizens, I can't help you.

0
YankeeJim

Once again, I share your concern. In fact, with rare exceptions, I have eliminated air travel.

The task of defining what is necessary to protect versus invasion of privacy needs point by point specific consideration, don't you think.

Not one size fits all.


1
Albert Milliron

AOL already had a pretty good news section.  They were nearly or as fast as mainstream media sources.  Huffington Post has some good writers, but it's progressive reputation will ultimately hurt AOL.  Already hearing chatter of Conservative AOL readers looking for another outlet for news. 

I have an alternative for those folks... but that would be self-serving


0
YankeeJim

Oh go ahead, ladle it up.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Albert Milliron
First Flagged at 12:35 PM, Feb 7, 2011 by Albert Milliron
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from