Are Republicans defending nations that want to kill gays?

by JerryM | September 1, 2012 at 07:08 am
280 views | 2 Recommendations | 10 comments

The Republican party platform is slamming President Obama for his opposition to human rights violations of gays, in developing nations. I guess that would include his opposition to bills, such as in Uganda, that would kill gays for consensual sex. The Oklahoma Republican party platform by the way, supports the imprisonment of gay men for consensual sex, but hey, at least not they don't support executing them.

The Republican national platform includes opposition to the federal minimum wage apply to the North Marianas islands, a territory of the U.S. See, manufacturers can pay sweatshop wages to workers in factories in these islands, but still have the ability to slap a made in the U.S.A. tag on the clothes. Pretty sneaky, I must say. The GOP party platform also opposes Washington, D.C. from becoming a state. They rather have the people of D.C. treated as indentured servents and take orders from Congress, since Congress can overrule any local decisions by the people of Washington D.C. and their government.

Oh, a gay atheist has won a Democratic congressional primary in the Phoenix area. While there are a few gay members of Congress, there is only one non-theist, Pete Starks from California. Unfortunately, current Arizona state senator Krysten Sinema likes to go by the term, non-theist instead of atheist. Atheists are easier to despise, than the non-threatening non-theist. But anyway, great progress.

Finally, sadly but not surprisly the new television show, The New Normal is being censored by a NBC affiliate in Utah. Yes, they have the right to do so, but it is a sad commentary on them. The show seems it will revolve around a male gay couple that want to raise a child. There is a petition on change.org urging this affiliate to not censor this show.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Doc Vega

Hey Bozo, how about Muslims slaughtering Christians all over North Africa and the Middle East, but for the convenient fact that our leftist media has no interest in reporting those stories, do they? Why don't you try asking why Muslims are allowed to torture and stone Gays, Christians, promiscuous daughters, and anyone else that doesn't fit in with their agenda? No instead you want to smear Republicans with an irrelevant article with idiotic reasoning. What in the hell is your problem?

0
liberal hypocracy

for the very same reason the Muslim Brotherhood will be opening the DNC convention. Obama and the left hate America.

2
JerryM

Um, it is only the Republican party that is controlled by religious fundamentalist theocrats. Not the Dems. So if you want to know what is the American Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S.A., it is Christian rightwing who hate our secular republic. So in other words, go to hell,

0
liberal hypocracy

Democratic Party is controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood. Democrats and the Muslim hate our Republic and want a democracy. Once you have your democracy, you will institute the fascism you have failed to shove down our throats so far. It's why Al Gore wants to do away with the Electoral College. So the six largest States, six largest liberal dominated urban metropolises, can dictate statist policy to the entire country and win every election from now on. Stage two is to get rid of the guns. Can't have any free men revolting against or destroying the progressive statist utopia.

1
JerryM

You moron. You stupid idiot. The 6 largest states make up a minority of America and the 6 largest cities make up only about 10% of the American population. I am sick and tired of ignorant morons who post on the internet who have no idea what they are talking about.

1
liberal hypocracy

Ah Jerry, brilliant retort. Not on subject of course, as usual but, a wonderful exercise of the ad hominem. Your public school education shining through. You should educate yourself on how the popular vote works under the Electoral College and then sans Electoral College before you shoot your mouth off. The fact that you prog's are so eager to carry water for the Muslim Brotherhood is proof enough that you have no ideas worth supporting, and will jump on any anti-American, anti-Judeo-Christian idealism in the hopes of destroying the Republic in the name of your statist fascism.

1
JerryM

You dolt, I have a degree in political science. I have more knowledge about the electoral college then you have in your entire brain. I for one know that under the EC about 12 states decide who is president. 38 or so are ignored. I know in a direct popular vote, every vote in every state matters because a vote in Wyoming is equal to a vote in New York. Every voter would be equal and a candidate would have to campaign everywhere. But all you recite are rightwing talking points that you heard or read from someone else. I have read posts like yourself from about a thousand people and being 1001 doesn't make you not wrong.

1
liberal hypocracy

A degree! Oh my. I bow to your superiorness and self-inflated ego. Wow. You should have taken the electives in feather arrangement or basket weaving. I could have gotten you work. In Cuba. where you could live out your idealism in real time. Seems like every OWS moron shitting on cop cars and destroying public/private property sports one of today's degrees. Your fellow travelers have got your back. Just watch were you step. They leave their 'mark on society' everywhere but the bathroom or the workplace.

Not to nit pick but, I think the number is eleven States and a candidate does not require all of them. Obama won in 2008 by focusing his voting efforts on nine major urban centers with large intercity minority populations and won receiving 222 of the electoral votes.

BTW the six largest States make up near 50% of the population so it doesn't take any giant intellectual leap to realize how doing away with the Electoral College would not only disenfranchise the other 50% but, lead to the break down of the Republic as the Democratic Party brought about their socialist State. Not that that would worry you.

In a direct popular vote small States and their interests would be completely ignored and only six, [say seven just to clinch it] of largest States by population would be needed to RULE in perpetuity. Those large urban centric States being Democratic Party controlled "safe States". Which is why Al Gore thinks we should get rid of the Electoral College. The US would become a single Party State over night and you Statist fascist would have the ovens on high heat as you began to exterminate anyone who isn't goosestepping to your merry tune of 'the Internationale'.

When we don't learn from history we repeat history. It's a shame you didn't come out of the education system educated. If you had, you wouldn't be swilling the poison of socialism. Nor trying to sell it as the fountain of political youth and a good substitute for freedom.

0
tikun

 Democracy in action.


1
Karen Hatter

Jerry, did you read this article?

From Exporting the Anti-Gay Movement:

While anti-gay legislation is promoted as a response to the spread of Western ideas, discriminatory laws were originally the product of Western colonization in Africa. Now colonial-era laws banning “carnal knowledge against the order of nature” are being expanded to prohibit lesbian relationships, to outlaw same-sex marriages, to prevent the adoption of children by same-sex couples, and to outlaw LGBT organizations. It is homophobia, not homosexuality, that is being imported to the continent by neocolonialists with an agenda: to spread U.S. culture wars worldwide.

 

How did African sexual minorities become collateral damage in the U.S. culture wars? The story of American religious conservatives’ involvement on the continent is long and complicated. While American mainline churches, with their more liberal views on social issues, supported the fight against South African apartheid and other colonial regimes, many conservative U.S. evangelicals insisted that anti-colonial leaders were godless communists and terrorists. Despite this ignoble history, American conservatives have reinvented themselves as Africa’s best allies and the true representatives of Western Christianity. This dramatic makeover has involved heavy investment in communications networks with continental reach; both Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network and the evangelical Trinity Broadcasting Network are seen across sub-Saharan Africa, and Christian-right radio networks abound. Evangelical churches and groups provide scholarships for African clerics to receive conservative theological training at U.S. institutions. They sponsor orphanages, Bible schools, universities, and social-welfare projects. 

African evangelical churches have traditionally been doctrinally orthodox but socially progressive on such issues as national liberation and poverty, making them natural partners of liberal Western churches. The African churches long depended on financial aid from mainline U.S. churches for most of their operations. However, right-wing groups have enticed numerous African religious leaders to reject funding from mainline denominations and to accept replacement funds from the American Christian right. 

A turning point came in the late 1990s, when the Christian right was beginning to lose the fight over gay ordination in mainline churches, including the global Anglican Communion. American religious conservatives responded by mobilizing their African clerical allies to oppose equal rights for LGBT people in the church. At the 1998 Lambeth Conference, a worldwide gathering of Anglican and Episcopal bishops that takes place every ten years, the Anglican Communion discussed human sexuality and gay and lesbian ordination at length for the first time. Following the conference, right-wing American evangelicals encouraged African bishops to support a suspension of the Episcopal Church USA from the worldwide Anglican Communion because it was too gay-friendly and socially liberal—threatening a global schism. The campaign took on new urgency in 2003 when American Episcopalians consecrated openly gay Gene Robinson as the bishop of New Hampshire. Conservative “renewal” movements in the Episcopal, United Methodist, and Presbyterian churches capitalized on Robinson’s ordination to mobilize against the “gay agenda” creeping into Christianity. Anglican churches in Uganda, Kenya, and Nigeria rejected funding from the Episcopal Church USA, replacing it with money from Christian-right groups. 

 

The financial ties between U.S. conservatives and African political and religious leaders are often clandestine, with both parties typically denying any funding relationship. Tax documents show that two African leaders—Stephen Langa, whose Family Life Network hosted the Kampala anti-gay conference in 2009, and Martin Ssempa, pastor of the Makerere Community Church in Kampala and a leading promoter of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill—have both received funding from conservative U.S. groups. David Bahati, who introduced Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill, has deep ties to the secretive U.S. Christian political group known as the Family, or the Fellowship. According to investigative journalist Jeff Sharlet, Bahati “appears to be a core member of the Family. … He organizes their Ugandan National Prayer Breakfast and oversees an African sort of student leadership program designed to create future leaders for Africa, into which the Family has poured millions of dollars.”

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Karen Hatter
First Flagged at 8:41 AM, Sep 2, 2012 by Karen Hatter

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from