NP Rank:
Arizona's and Idaho's immigration laws why they wont work
Key provisions of Arizona's immigration legislation, signed into law by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer on Friday:- Makes it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally by specifically requiring immigrants to have proof of their immigration status. Violations are a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $2,500. Repeat offenses would be a felony.
So now the state is going to be paying more to try and stop illegal emigrants but still dose not punish the employer
- Requires police officers to "make a reasonable attempt" to determine the immigration status of a person if there is a "reasonable suspicion" that he or she is an illegal immigrant. Race, color or national origin may not be the only things considered in implementation. Exceptions can be made if the attempt would hinder an investigation.- Allow lawsuits against local or state government agencies that have policies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws. Would impose daily civil fines of $1,000-$5,000. There is pending follow-up legislation to halve the minimum to $500.- Targets hiring of illegal immigrants as day laborers by prohibiting people from stopping a vehicle on a road to offer employment and by prohibiting a person from getting into a stopped vehicle on a street to be hired for work if it impedes traffic.
But says nothing about someone picking up day laborers
- The law will take effect by late July or early August.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Idaho House State Affairs Committee on Friday wisely rejected a bill that would put the onus on employers to stop illegal immigration.The measure would have required employers to verify workers' immigration status. Companies could have had their business licenses suspended or revoked for hiring people unauthorized to work in the United States. "You're asking employers to basically police federal immigration law," said Republican Rep. John Vander Woude, a Nampa dairyman.
This is the only way you will ever get a handle on the immigration problem. You have to put some responsibly on the employer.
He's right. Penalizing employers is a poor substitute for real immigration reform.
If employers are made to check then there would be no demand hence a lot smaller problem
It's the kind of piecemeal, Band-Aid approach that has actually made the illegal immigration problem worse.It's modeled on a three-month-old Arizona law, which has already proven to be an economic disaster. Scores of farm workers have gone to other states.
It is simple pay a living wage and people will work for you
The last thing Idaho agriculture, which already has too few farm and dairy workers, needs is to export labor to Texas and California.
We have one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation it is the employers are used to such cheap labor with little regard for the workers they hire.
The fact that extreme proposals like Hart's can even get a hearing reflects the damage that's being done by America's failure to implement a national immigration policy. Immigration reform should be Job One when a new president and Congress take office next January.America's Golden Door has fallen off its rusty hinges. It can't be fixed by turning Farmer Brown into Marshal Dillon.
Farmer brown would not have a problem doing this if there were hefety fines and jail time for breaking the law.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 02:13 on April 25th, 2010
FOOL!Only GOD can protect us from THE MEXICANS!
at 05:59 on April 25th, 2010
Only God can protect us from the Mexicans,but who can protect us from the Americans?Illegal entry and stay into US is a crime;illegal occupation of others' land by US is what?
at 09:31 on April 25th, 2010
I think the real question is who can protect us from the goverment
at 21:45 on April 25th, 2010
Can't anyone get it it is the employer that is exploiting the workers is the problem as long as people feel than can come here illegaly and get work even IF cought and deported. The work is still here. Do we propose to put em in jail for years after the second or third time of being cought now that makes sence pay more taxpayer money to lock em up then they earn on the outside and then the job is still there. And no these are not jobs that can be easly "out sorsed" this is all ready happining and that is another isue needs to be delt with.
at 18:29 on April 29th, 2010
FOOL only mexicans do the dirty work that YOU don't want to. If it comes down to who gets a job the Americans well get it not the Mexicans. Now i'm not saying all Americans are racist but, this law discriminates against black hair and brown skin. So if your too worried about God protecting you from the Mexicans go out and work in the field for an 18 hour shift so they won't take all of your wonderful jobs that you are whining about.
at 12:40 on May 1st, 2010
Uh, Too many people discriminate the law wrongfully. Try reading the actual bill sb1070s. It states that no employer doing contractor work can pick up illigals for employment. They can not stop in the roadways or highways( which are under federal juristiction, wake up America!) to "higher" workers. No employment of any kind can take place on the Highways and Biways. The bill also states that fines and imprisionment along with loss of licences will result from failure to comply. More than half the bill depicts the conduct to which our American contractors must abide by and details what is considered illigal conduct, hence a big incentive to follow the law hence the deflating out come(less illigal immigrants) that would entail such an epic. Please inform and educate yourself, Serious things go wrong with uneducated societies being irrational and too emotional.(Religious zelots in the middle east) My husband is currently awaiting asylum and is on a legal federal bond. (he was driving unlicenced which is federal territory) I know and accept the law, My granparents did not come here in vain, christian Americans made this country and if you want to reside here then uphold the moral principal set by its laws.
at 09:26 on July 20th, 2010
There is a reason that educated people do not support massive deportation and irrational immigration legislation: you will destroy this country. Talking heads need to cut the crap about the religious background of this country in order to demean others (Catholicism is Christianity too, Einstein). As with all non-native residents of the day the founding fathers had a Christian upbringing, but unlike the majority of the population these men were pure products of the Age of Enlightenment and were overwhelmingly Deist. So while there they believed in a higher power or even a God, painfully few actually believed in Christ. So END that discussion Kelly. To return to the topic, here are the reasons that the anti-immigrant zealots are dead wrong:1. Low wages control inflation and maintain a manageable consumer price index without government price setting (socialism).2. If jobs currently filled by illegal immigrants (10 hour days, $5/hr, no benefits, often sleeping on site or even in the fields) were filled by US citizens, conditions would have to change dramatically, unionization would likely occur and the economic impact would be immense.3. History does not support you. The first immigration law came in 1875 to outlaw the import of Chinese sex workers to the US. Thereafter ethnocentrism and bigotry towards Catholics from Germany and eastern Europe prompted the limitation of immigrants from specific countries to 3% in 1921 and dropped to 2% in 1924 (in this year Asians were also outlawed from immigrating and no limits were placed on immigrants from Latin America due in large part to the Mexican Revolution). From then on the socialist tendencies of the 1930s let to other irrational immigration laws that should be immediately repealed. The founding fathers wanted to include the Dutch and Irish settlers and encourage immigrants to come to the fledgling nation (as noted by the lack of a national language and leading to laws such as the Homestead Act) but racism and ethnocentrism has led us away from their vision.4. A closed door on immigration means an even less competitive and more state controlled nation (such as Sweden or Germany with high wages and little to no economic growth). If you want the socially engineered lives of Europeans then go ahead and limit immigration.5. You will run the last of the small farmers out of business and seal the fate of US agriculture and industry to a handful of state supported corporations.6. The World Bank and IMF have high-jacked the economy in Latin American and NAFTA is a horrible failure in Mexico, meaning that our OWN actions have caused this massive immigration because of economic imperialism.Please stop the Nativist insanity and don't follow the self destructive principle of the Know Nothings. Read the conservative (read Libertarian) findings of the CATO Institute that support more open immigration www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-63.pdf Then you will see that this brand of hate-mongering against Latinos and Mexicans in particular is conterproductive from ANY viewpoint.