NP Rank:
Army psychiatrist who did shooting rampage was under FBI probe
Gunman shouted, "Allahu Akbar" before opening fire: "Allah is great".
Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" — an Arabic phrase for "God is great!" — before opening fire, the base commander said Friday....
The 39 year old army major who went on a shotting spree which killed 13 and injured 31 at Fort Hood was under an FBI probe for his sympathies with Muslim terrorists.
Gunman named as army psychiatrist Nidal Malik HasanMuslim major brought down by Kim Munley, a civilian female police officer He is now under armed guard in a stable condition in hospital Hasan was fervently opposed to war on terror Was due to be deployed to Iraq at end of year - but did not want to go Had treated hundreds of traumatised Iraq and Afghanistan veterans
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/....html#ixzz0W5U8hbRH
The army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people in a murderous rampage at America's biggest military base was facing an FBI investigation for expressing sympathy with suicide bombers.
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, 39, had allegedly posted a series of comments on a website which drew parallels between terrorists and a US soldier who sacrificed himself to save his comrades.
Investigators were tipped off six months ago by the devout Muslim's worried colleagues.
His behaviour was particularly alarming as he was responsible for the psychological well-being of many vulnerable soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq.
'If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory,' he is said to have written.
'Their intention is not to die because of some despair. Their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam.'
A well-known opponent of the war on terror, Hasan yesterday armed himself with two handguns before bursting into a medical centre at Fort Hood in Texas and spraying the room with bullets.
The major was eventually brought down by a female civilian police officer who shot him four times - despite being shot herself.
She and her partner responded to the shooting within three minutes, Lt. Gen. Bob Cone said, describing her actions as 'amazing and aggressive'.
And more details are emerging about the Major's past, and conflicts he experienced with his Muslim identity and being part of the US Military:
He swore an oath of loyalty to the military," Grieger said. "I didn't hear anything contrary to those oaths."But, more recently, federal agents grew suspicious.
At least six months ago, Hasan came to the attention of law enforcement officials because of Internet postings about suicide bombings and other threats, including posts that equated suicide bombers to soldiers who throw themselves on a grenade to save the lives of their comrades.
They had not determined for certain whether Hasan is the author of the posting, and a formal investigation had not been opened before the shooting, said law enforcement officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the case.
Federal authorities seized Hasan's computer Friday during a search of his apartment in Killeen, Texas, said a U.S. military official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.
In an interview with The Washington Post, Hasan's aunt, Noel Hasan of Falls Church, Va., said he had been harassed about being a Muslim in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and he wanted out of the Army.
"Some people can take it and some people cannot," she said. "He had listened to all of that and he wanted out of the military."
Recommendations (66)
-
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Mritunjay
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
PeaceFrog
New York, United States -
Pat Garcia
La Paz, Mexico -
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 07:03 on November 6th, 2009
Is there really a mystery about what happened at Ft. Hood? The trouble begins with a religion that has intolerance, hate, and mistreatment at its core. Members can snap at any time and justify their actions in the name of their faith. One might ask, could you not say the same thing about Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or any religious extremists? The answer is yes, however, the Muslim creed is rooted in notions that are irreversibly intolerant and therefore perpetuate people being misfits in modern society. This irreconcilable difference manifests under conditions ranging from extreme as in the case of an Muslim Army Major Psychiatrist being activated to duty in the middle east, to Washington Beltway sniper John Allen Muhammad who felt mistreated by society for many reasons including experience in the military.
While America harbors the belief that religions must be tolerated, I don’t believe that all religions are equal with respect to their degree of alignment with American values of liberty and justice for all. Is it possible that Islam is out of step with American values? If so, is it possible that not all religions are worthy of equal protection under the law when the religion itself is outside the law?at 10:03 on November 6th, 2009
I doubt he was a Psychiatrist! He himself could use one!
It also makes one think how dangerous are internal threats when compared to external ones.
at 10:19 on November 6th, 2009
Reports state he wanted out of the Army and had secured a lawyer to do so, but this does not equate to a suicide mission--which it appears to have been. He did not expect to survive the attack. If he wanted out bad enough, he could have just gone AWOL and gone to another country or attempted to disappear or commited suicide without killing others.
at 14:19 on November 6th, 2009
Await the full FBI Report.
at 11:56 on November 6th, 2009
talking in support of the enemy
Wouldn't this be considered treason?
He should have been allowed to leave the military with statements he made which could have been defined as treasonist.
If he was philosophycally and/or religiously opposed to military engagement, why did he join the army? Even as a physician, although not required to carry a weapon, by the nature of enlistment he supports the U.S. military no matter where they are or what course of action they undertake.
at 14:22 on November 6th, 2009
I find my disdain for Muslims distasteful, though I cannot find an argument for otherwise.
at 14:29 on November 6th, 2009
I agree rng, YankeeJim is being open, honest, vulnerable, and decent. It is the covert bias which exists in many "liberal" people which is frightening. The conflict between the world of Islaam and the West, and its wars, is real: It is serious, it is human, it is frightening. No one is to blame: 2 ideologies are clashing. But we cannot put a black hat on one side. It is a clash of 2 opposing forces in life, and 2 stances which are irreconcilable.
at 14:44 on November 6th, 2009
This story is better than many of the leading media sources. It is a shame that basic questions are not answered in a story of this magnitude.
What is the name of the military lawyer who represented his attempt to leave the service, and what did he tell that lawyer?
Was he harassed off-base indicating community-based harassment/ gang stalking?
Did his unnamed military lawyer feel he had legal grounds to sue the military, including discrimination and harassment constituting a legally "hostile work environment"?
Hopefully, a NowPublic writer can clarify these issues and add substance to the heretofore repetitive accounts lacking any real investigatory journalism.
at 14:51 on November 6th, 2009
Thanks PeaceFrog: I believe you raise important questions, which I hope we can find the answers to. This is obviously a far more complex story than the media would like anyone to believe: I intuit it.
at 15:42 on November 6th, 2009
Wow, fascinating, and very good response on his part! thanks for posting that, rng!
at 15:46 on November 6th, 2009
I have seen Mr. Dajani's reports on Link TV as well as many others about the Middle East, and I have found them to be non-partisan and factual from my perspective. A religious backlash is bound to happen when something like this happens, and his response does aim at the core of one's own prejudices and should spur us on to separate the person from his religion or ethnicity.