Aurora movie theater shootings the repercussions being felt

by Doc Vega | July 20, 2012 at 09:03 pm

343 views | 2 Recommendations | 0 comments

It won't take long for the spin doctors to turn the truth into lies over a human tragedy.

Within hours of the televised coverage of the morbid killing spree at the Century 15 Movie Theater in Aurora, Colorado as the liberal spin was already applied. What can we expect in the bloody wake of the uncanny shooting of innocent moviegoers at midnight Thursday morning. In an already panicky society that is being pushed by Democrat narratives and government overreaction to every threat that comes down the pipe-now this tragedy!

The call for more gun control

Already the liberal media has been grilling the Mayors of US cities over gun control. One CNN anchor woman was reminding Mayor Nutter of Philadelphia over a recent UN gun control initiative, that by the way is unconstitutional as international law has no jurisdiction over US sovereignty. Yet, ultimately this is the wave that is attempting to wash the growing specter of government regulation down our throats. You can bet that there will be a call among Mayors across the nation pressured by liberal propaganda and Obama administration rhetoric to eliminate personal firearms and tighten the noose of more laws around our necks.

If they take away citizen's guns only criminals will have them

As Mark Stein, radio journalist, who was in for Rush Limbaugh on Friday mentioned, if citizens are denied being able to carry their own firearm for protection then who will stop the madmen from completing their carnage? Who will stand up to these crazies in the midst of bloody shooting sprees that the police, as usual, are impotent to stop, but are great at picking up the evidence long after the body bags have been filled. When the government has restricted gun ownership then only criminals will have guns, because anyone who wants to kill badly enough will find weapons one way or another. Why should the rest of us suffer more binding laws to scrutinize our movements, monitor our purchases, and profile us as potential threats, like there’s not enough of that going on already?

The lone gunman theory

I’ve said it before and I will say it again that these lone gunman who appear to be just isolated crazies serve an even more sinister purpose. They are fulfilling a precise intelligence role with a covert purpose, and that purpose is to ultimately disarm the American public. The UN and liberal Washington leaders have been trying to do this for decades. With gun ownership abolished, with the George Zimmerman’s of the world pronounced guilty by the press before there’s ever a trial, America will be ripe for an overthrow and a world government takeover as our rights to defend ourselves are torn from our grasp by an ever expanding police state.

Ask yourself this people, how many more lone disturbed gunmen are there roaming around? Are we creating them? Is society so amoral that we are desensitizing our youth to the brutal consequences of violence? Are violent video games serving as a prerequisite conditioning mechanism for the ticking time bombs of lone crazed gunmen in our midst’s?

Rush's fault-really?

Already the left in America is pushing this tragedy into a further case for more government control over our lives and blaming conservatives. Rush Limbaugh was blamed on Wednesday for mentioning that in the Batman movie Bain is a criminal, is it just a coincidence that Romney worked for Bain Capital, right? The shooting must be Rush Limbaugh’s fault!

Who is the shooter?

James Holmes was initially identified as a Tea Party member until a retraction was made and the mistake admitted. This is just another dimension of how the left will use personal tragedy, as they always do, to vilify the conservatives. Remember how the left descended upon Sarah Palin and the Tea Party after Congresswoman, Gabriel Giffords was shot in Arizona by another lone, crazed gunman, who was not the religious fanatic, Tea Party nut job, that the mainstream media had pronounced him to be.

Where's the government once they take your gun and the shooter shows up?

Again and again we in America are seeing the damaging narratives that capitalize on the suffering of others in order to further their political aims. Just as we will see a call for gun control and blame patriots, Tea Parties, and conservatives as being the shameless purveyors of guns, anger, and pressure that allows the proliferation of weapons to aid the cause of lone, psychotic, gunmen waiting in the wings to start another mass public murder in some unsuspecting setting. Now, we never will know just who or from where the next mad man will explode in another deadly killing spree. In view of this reality supported paranoid framework there will be our government taking away our self defense, keeping us under surveillance, and allowing the United Nations to have authority over our nation. Mark my words. The day will come if these scenarios are allowed to come to fruition.

Angry white man myth

Was James Holmes just another angry white man? Initially the press stated no. No, James Holmes does not appear to be a typical angry white male. Why? Apparently he was avery intelligent medical student so he was disqulified from the honor of being the stereotypical lone gunman. This is just another myth that has been perpetrated by our leftist media. It would seem that there have been more than shootings committed by other nationalities than white angry males. It seems Arab terrorists, disenfranchised Asian college students, and the Washington DC former military snipers, who happened to have been black outnumber them angry white lone psychotic gunmen. However, the truth is a very rare commodity these days and conflicting ideologies in America do a great job of muddying the waters and distorting the issues.

This article is not an advertisement for the NRA. Niether does the NRA own America or do they have enough influence to change policy. The question is about America remaining a free society and the pressures both seen and unseen that are working against liberty in the US.