Barack Obama awarded 2009 Nobel Peace Prize

by mudricky | October 9, 2009 at 01:13 am
2466 views | 89 Recommendations | 46 comments

Quote

But next year let's give it to Miss World. Every year Miss World comes on and says I want world peace and the world free of nuclear weapons.It's a hope, an aspiration. This is a Nobel Peace Prize for not being George Bush.
Sky News foreign affairs editor Tim Marshall

President Barack Obama has been awared the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples".

The committee said they agreed with Obama's "vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons".

Already many news commentators from various media sites have question this award and that it 'may be to early to judge Obamas work'.

The Nobel Committee said on issuing the award: "Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future"

"His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population."

The prize worth 10 million Swedish kronor ($1.4m/£880,000) includes a gold medal and a diploma, all the prizes will be presented to Obama in Oslo on December 10.

Some of the favourites this year were Zimbabwe's prime minister and a Chinese dissident, There was a record total of 205 nominations for the title.

Videos

President Barack Obama - Wolfgang Edelmayer

see larger video

sourced by nagba

President Barack Obama - Wolfgang Edelmayer

Weblinks: The Nobel Foundation

THE SELECTION PROCESS

Those qualified to nominate candidates include members of national governments, international judiciary, academics and previous prize winners

Five Norwegians are chosen by Norway's parliament to sit on the Nobel Committee

The committee compiles a shortlist of between five and 20 candidates

The shortlist is considered by the Nobel Institute's permanent advisers, mainly Norwegian academics

The Nobel Committee chooses the winner

Details of the nominations and selection process are kept secret for 50 years

US President Barack Obama has won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.

The Nobel Committee said he was awarded it for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples".

There were a record 205 nominations for this year's prize.

The laureate - chosen by a five-member committee - wins a gold medal, a diploma and 10m Swedish kronor ($1.4m).

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
12
J2B

Is it award to Obama "the man" or Obama "The President?"Is this the first time a sitting president has won the award?Who was the last black person to win the award?Congrats to Obama, and congrats to all Black Americans!"This will put the hen among the chickens, or is it the fox or maybe the right-wing extremists?"There will be a whole bunch of insane people this weekend, we'll probably get a few here on NP?YouTube Videowww.youtube.com/watch?v=hPv_t6HHEHI&feature=player_embedded

10
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

But why? In recent times no sitting US President has received the Nobel Peace Prize - and some of them worked hard to create peace and stability in the world.  Gorbachev was given the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990 but Reagan was ignored.

And if there's one US President who deserved the Nobel Peace Prize it was Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, while in office got the Israeli Palestinian Agreement signed, played a key role in bringing the official conflct between Jordan and Israel,   and was a principal Character albeit behind the scenes in the Northern Ireland Peace Process - and has been a great humanitarian since leaving office and there is no Nobel Prize for him. So why Mr. Obama and why now? 

Especially his achievements in this area are negligible and there has not been much progress on the peace front in any one of the major hot spots in the world since President Obama took office. Well of course there was for soaring rhetoric - but is that good enough for the Nobel Peace Prize.

This is very much real.  Obama was awarded this prize based on his efforts.  This includes his Cairo speech to the Muslim world and his efforts to sit down with the Iranian regime.  

The award is definitely controversial and will, no doubt, be in the talking points of all the talk radio hosts today.

Congratulations to Barrack Obama.  How is efforts for peace will play out, remains to be seen.  In any case he has made the effort, which was enough for the Nobel Peace Prize Committee.

Good work mudricky.

6
Babel-Fish

Well it's about time his efforts have been recognized, his world rating is on a high and the beauty is he has to live up to the award and keep on pushing for a more peaceful world. Glad to see the first black American president achieving something special, his efforts at home may not of been regard as they have been overseas especially by those that support the republican party.

This is going to really annoy the republicans on the far right, lol.    


6
nanute

Congratulations to President Obama.  I think this was a communist plot to see whose head will explode first: Rush Limbaugh's or Glenn Beck's.

6
mudricky

The first thing I did was check before I posted. When I posted mine it had only happened so I checked that last few stories uploaded and there was nothing.

Since then there has been a few copy stories. This one below was not long after me: http://my.nowpublic.com/world/barack-obama-nobel-peace-2009-award if that's the story you mean.

If logs for the other stories state I posted after them then it isn't correct. 

I have in the past removed any stories if I have posted after someone else.

5
charliemcmillan

it's a bit early for something like that... I would say this is wrong

5
mudricky
The award is certainly unexpected and might be regarded as more of an encouragement for intentions than a reward for achievements.

After all, the president has been in office for a little over eight months and he might hope to serve eight years. His ambition for a world free of nuclear weapons is one that is easier to declare than to achieve and a climate control agreement has yet to be reached.

Indeed, the citation indicates that it is President Obama's world view that attracted the Nobel committee - that diplomacy should be founded "on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population".

Paul Reynolds
BBC News, London

4
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Here is the view form CBC Canada.

The committee attached special importance to Obama's vision and work for a world without nuclear weapons in the prize citation, which was read in Oslo on Friday.

"The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations," the citation said.

The Nobel committee said Obama has created a new climate in international politics that has focused on multilateral diplomacy and an emphasis on the role of the United Nations and other international institutions.

"Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," the citation said.


4
jefhow22

["This is going to really annoy the republicans on the far right"...]

I think it is going to annoy the citizens of the US on either side of the aisle. The only benefit I see for the O is that it will take some of the heat off of him for his inability to pay attention and fix things in the US. Just an opinion here not a personal attack...

4
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

The fact that deliberations on this concluded in February, it was very early in his Presidency.  I have read a few comments around the world on this this morning.  The reaction is mixed from both the right and the left.  Most are surprised.  Nevertheless I'm with you in congratulating President Obama on this award.  For the sake of the world I hope that his intentions of a nuke free world and cooperation with the muslim world succeed.

4
Hugh Askew

Well if that don't beat all.

They decided this back in February? One month after he took office?

Wow......no political leanings in that vote.


4
Colonel Boyle

I don't think I've ever seen such a biased, partisan attribution of award to someone. I'm not American and am pretty agnostic about the politics over there, but it's pretty clear that this is an aware designed to deliver another slap to Bush. Much like the literature award going to Harold Pinter's woeful, sixth-form anti-war 'poetry' a couple of years back, or Al Gore's award.

There is still no peace in the Middle East - not even so much as a meeting between the parties. Not a single nuclear missile has been decommissioned.War is continuing in Afghanistan - and may even be stepped up.

I don't doubt his intentions - nor his ability to achieve things given time - but there is no justification for this award. None.

I'm sure given the fierce partisanship over there, "annoying the Republicans" might seem like a good outcome, but this award is supposed to be a significant and rare honour for someone who has transformed a situation in the world.

4
Chevalier de Pas

Yes we can!

4
nanute

Some people just hate this president with all the fiber of their being, and will never accept anything positive from him. (I hope I'm proven wrong.)

Here is a completely different take on the award: (It is my opinion.) Maybe, just maybe this Nobel Peace Prize is America's peace prize. Perhaps the committee was sending a message to all Americans that finally after 8 years of disastrous leadership on the world stage, American citizens had the good sense to elect a leader that would try and restore our prestige and stature in the international community. 

It is beyond my why some people are so intent, after 8 months or less,are hoping that our President is a failure. It is not about Obama, it is about  all of us. Differences of opinion is one thing. Hoping for the failure, or much worse, of the president is another matter.



3
stringsofhypocrisy

He was given this prestigious award for "efforts". I should assume that GOOD parents should be awarded the same...at least their attempts are merited and seen through to the end. This president has proven to be all bark and no bite. When we see results, then MAYBE he should be CONSIDERED for the Nobel Peace Prize. Until then, go flaunt your expensive suits on late night shows and parade your lovely family around baseball games Mr. President.

3
MDewie

Are you serious? Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel peace prize more on the basis of his values and vision than for his concrete achievements. Nominations for the prize closed on February 1 - less than two weeks after his inauguration on January 20. Source: www.metro.co.uk/news/world/article.html?Does_Barack_Obama_deserve_the_Nobel_Peace_Prize?&in_article_id=750176&in_page_id=64 BTW - Democrats can keep patting themselves on the back, while watching America go up in flames.

3
Amy Judd

When is the decision for the award made? Because he hasn't been in office that long really has he?

3
mudricky

Febuary... I know shocker... he was only 11 days in office

How the Nobel Peace Prize Is Awarded

President Obama, the third sitting American president to win the Nobel Peace Prize, was selected from a so-called "short list" of 5 to 20 finalist candidates.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee's deadline for nominations was February 1, just 11 days after Obama's inauguration. Up to 200 nominations are received annually by the committee, a number that has risen steadily as the award has become increasingly global.

"There may occasionally be several thousand nominators behind one and the same nominee," the committee'sWeb site reads.

A record 205 nominations were received by the committee this year, including 33 organizations. The previous record was 199 in 2005.

3
tikun

 

Here are two comments: one from times-on-line and from an Israeli source.

Jerusalem, Israel; News that President Obama received the Nobel Peace elicited a gasp from the anchor of afternoon newsreel of Israel Broadcasting Authority Radio on Friday - "Well, now that is a surprise", she said with some spontaneity.

Within an hour of the announcement, Reuven Rivlin, veteran speaker of the Israel Knesset Parliament, warned  that "Someone who gets a peace prize should not force-feed Israel with his version of peace",  going on to say that he hoped that the peace prize would not inspire the president to "dictate a peace accord to Israel"

Israel has reason to be concerned.

The committee that awards the Nobel Peace prize is comprised of officials from the Norwegian political elite, as opposed to other Nobel prizes for excellence in science, education, health or other scholarly concerns.

The announcement of this prize occurs at a time that Norway remains almost the only European nation to recognize, aid and abet the Hamas regime in Gaza, at  a time when Norway sanctions boycotts of some Israeli companies, and at at time when Norway openly funds movements in Israel that advocate the expulsion of Jewish communities from Judea, Samaria, the Golan and Jerusalem.

Things are so bad between Norway and Israel that the Israeli Foreign Ministry is now considering filing  a formal request to expel Norwegian peace keeping observers from Hebron.

In other words, for many Israelis. the Norwegian endorsement of a peace initiatives of President Obama reads like a kiss of death for Israel, conveying a message, which is that the US should lead the world community to establish a Palestinian state, even if that state would launch aerial attacks on Israel's Ben Gurion Airport, much as the Palestinian entity in Gaza now fires freely on Sderot and the Western Negev.

Will the Nobel Peace Prize give President Obama the leverage that he needs to lower the boom on Israel?

Time will tell.

David Bedein can be reached at bedein@thebulletin.us

This is what the Times-On-Line had to say. Pretty Harsh comments and it appears to reflect the sentiment globally.

"The award of this year’s Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be met with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably deep embarrassment by the President himself.

div#related-article-links p a, div#related-article-links p a:visited { color:#06c; }

Rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan intent. It was clearly seen by the Norwegian Nobel committee as a way of expressing European gratitude for an end to the Bush Administration, approval for the election of America’s first black president and hope that Washington will honour its promise to re-engage with the world.

Instead, the prize risks looking preposterous in its claims, patronising in its intentions and demeaning in its attempt to build up a man who has barely begun his period in office, let alone achieved any tangible outcome for peace.

The pretext for the prize was Mr Obama’s decision to “strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples”. Many people will point out that, while the President has indeed promised to “reset” relations with Russia and offer a fresh start to relations with the Muslim world, there is little so far to show for his fine words"

2
caj1

No, not too early. Not wrong.

2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Jeff\ the reaction around the world is similar to yours.  Most think that this is too early before the fruits of his outreach are seen.  I am not sure that this will take the heat off Obama, I think it puts pressure on him to be successful in his efforts of international diplomacy. 

2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

I was in the process of reporting this story when mudricky.s was the only one that showed as having been published.  I assume that he was the first then.  I didn.t publish my story then. 

2
Mary Richard

A Whitehouse official says the President "humbled" to be selected by the committee, and he is to speak live 10:30 am ET.

2
J2B

I suppose there will be those who will think Obama engineered this one?

2
Miss Caroline Bautista

H e is my one and only hero....This I will announce once again or declare.... BAM IS THE WORLD.For all his great efforts to unite people around the world regardless of faith and religion,encourages everyone to participate in discussion or have  compassion..especially with our health care reform,for every Americans rich or poor...HE DESERVED TO WIN THIS MOST HIGHEST AWARD.It's the President way of governing,with civility and CLASS.There are a lot of reasons that Pres.Bam was awarded the Nobel Peace.........he gives the world HOPES and PEACE....stretching  his hands to the poor,wealthy,powerful to have a one common goal......Peace and Unity. Hail to the Chief.

1
caj1

Mudricky, I learned it from you first! Congratulations on the fast post, and also to President Barack Obama for the Nobel Prize award.

1
dysamoria

presented on my birthday.

and who actually WROTE the speech?

1
lalith
Mahatma Gandhi was a nationalist opposed to international law and a form of globalism, which the people controlling the Nobel Prize oppose. Gandhi was nominated 12 times for the Nobel Peace Prize but never granted it. The Nobel Foundation has an information page detailing his nominations and the potential reasons for his lack of success.

Also, would anyone happen to know what Obama's plans for the reduction of USA's nuclear capability? This is for my knowledge.

1
PIM of SPAIN

We live economically in a climate of devaluation, the Nobel Peace price has joined the crowd. Sad....

1
René

BHO was nominated the day after the Inaugaration. for what at that time?

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

caj1
First Flagged at 1:38 AM, Oct 9, 2009 by caj1
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (89)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from