NP Rank:
Barack Obumbler
The Obama Administration’s gravitas is sinking faster than Atreyu's horse into the Swamp of Sorrow. Less than 700 hours into the Presidency, Obama, who promised the most ethical Administration ever, has placed a dozen lobbyists in high administration places, fumbled half a dozen cabinet appointments, and overlooked the fact that several appointments, including the Treasury Secretary, were tax cheats…OOPS. But even more alarming the Bamster himself has proven Joe the Plumber a modern day soothsayer by taking “Spread the wealth around” to Stalinist proportions. A trillion for democratic pet projects here, a few hundred billion for people who took out grossly irresponsible mortgages there, a dash of welfare spending with a spread of labor union to go on top and you get yourself what some of the boys back home might call a….err spit-sandwich, yea that’s it.
The United States is now openly considering a policy that is very similar to Sweden’s in nationalizing the nation’s banks. The State of California in an effort to stave off complete financial collapse finally passed a budget revision that called for $12 Billion in tax hikes and $11 billion in fresh borrowing. And to make matters worse there are already whispers abound that another multi-billion dollar bank bail out might be coming down the pipeline. So let me get this straight, the United States of America somehow finds it feasible to mimic the behavior of the economic powerhouse of Sweden in a Hugo Chavez style nationalization of the country’s banks. California, the worlds 8th largest economy, decides that instead of cutting blatant statist policies that use state funds to pay for healthcare for illegal aliens, sex changes for state employees, and Islamic educational tools for the state’s kindergardeners, that a nice fat tax hike for businesses and BILLIONS in fresh borrowing are the best way to keep the state running.
Adding insult to injury President Obama’s economic adviser came out today and like something out of Mad Magazine declared that the economic crisis would come to an end this year. Feb. 19 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. economy will keep deteriorating before reaching a low point in the second half of this year, an economic adviser to President Barack Obama said.
“We are in for more trouble. Things will get worse before they get better,” Christina Romer, chairwoman of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, said today in a speech at George Washington University. She said she expects the economy to “bottom out” by the third quarter “and I firmly expect positive growth by the end of the year.”
I hate to remind Ms Romer that inflation is back on the rise, the worlds economy is in shambles (Japan’s economy receded by a whopping 14% last quarter), major U.S. banks still stand on the verge of collapse, and many experts like revered investor Jim Rogers claim that the only place the world is headed is toward a major economic crash. Team Obama is betting heavily that Keynesian economic theories enacted through the recent stimulus packages will turn the economy around. Keynesian theories, developed by British economist John Maynard Keynes, suggest that an economic growth is best stimulated by injecting heavy federal spending into the private sector. Obama’s own advisers boldly tout that for every dollar is spent they will make a dollar and a half in return.
Let me remind everyone that a mere 5 months ago, hot on the campaign trail candidate Obumbler was lambasting the overspending of the Bush administration and saying that rising deficits could only lead to fiscal crisis. HMMM..do we remember that far back. So..if Obama’s main criticism of President Bush was out of control government spending then by Obama’s own admission the United States was already living in a fully “Stimulated” Keynesian economy, right? So if the Keynesianism before didn’t work then that means the Keynesianism now wont work either so that must mean that the only reason we are spending all this money is to simply “Spread the wealth around” and greatly expand the power of the federal government. But wait, that would make Obama a socialist wouldn’t it? Gee who’da figured that a guy hailing from Marxist south Chicago who’s only claim to fame was being a Che Guevara style community organizer would assume the presidency and resort to Stalinesque policy.
Though the President still has 4 more years to pull it back together, and believe me I hope he does, things sure aren’t looking good. The stimulus bill virtually wipes out the Clinton era regulations on expansion of state welfare roles, injects fresh bureaucracy into the healthcare system moving America 1 step closer to socialized healthcare (who the hell knows how we will pay for that), rewards people for terrible business decisions and props up the failing institutions that enabled those decisions.
One of the hardest lessons I learned in life is that sometimes we are going to fail. The same has to be true for individuals and businesses in a free market system. Simple economic principles tell us that the more debt that is shackled to any nation the less that nation’s currency is worth. The only thing that is keeping the dollar from failing right at this moment is that the Chinese keep buying our worthless treasury bonds, financing our debt. They do this in hopes that we the American people will keep buying cheap Chinese products which keeps Chinese workers employed; the only way China’s communist government stays in power. The only problem with that theory is that Americans are losing their jobs and not buying Chinese goods; the problem is global and Americans aren’t even looking at the real reason we are in the crisis and who the only party benefiting is (Can you say The Federal Reserve.) The fact sadly is that while the rest of the world is looking to America for a fix to this massive economic crisis, we have a rookie quarterback on the field who we drafted straight out of high school. While President Obama bumbles around the country and makes ridiculous claims of hope, change, and 4th quarter recoveries, the ship is heading straight for a reef. It’s just too bad for you and I that the bankers at the Federal Reserve have already left in all the life rafts.
P.H. Rolen is a guest editor for NowPublic.com and editorialist writing from Billings MT. He has written policy papers for The Heartland Institutes Infotech and Telecom Newsletter and has been featured on the worldnetdaily.com commentary page.
Crowd Power
-
charlietyack
London, United Kingdom
Recommendations (76)
-
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
djsblack
San Francisco, California, United States
-
Zachary Gauld
Corona, California, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Fripouille
Lyon, France






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (32)
at 15:26 on February 19th, 2009
I wonder, do you think it would be better to not have any kind of bail out system and just let people deal with their mess themselves? (I'm not criticizing, I'm just asking)
at 13:36 on February 20th, 2009
absolutely! what happened to people being responsible for their own decisions. People like Barnie Franks pushed lendors into giving loans to people who couldn't afford their mortgages. People, however should also have common sense not buy homes they cannnot afford.
This stimulous bill horrible. Look how the stock market is reacting to Obama's crappy decisions.
at 15:36 on February 19th, 2009
OK, so how do we fix it? I hear a lot of people complaining, but I don't hear an alternative theory. I'm with Amy, do we just let everyone fend for themselves? I keep hearing that we ought to let the car companies fail. Someone will buy those facilities and put the workers back to work, although I'm thinking they'll be offered non-union jobs at that point. What are our options? What affect will they have on the global economy?
PS - Can we drop the name calling? It's a bit junior high isn't it?
at 15:40 on February 19th, 2009
A spade is a spade man.... I don't pull punches. I see statism I say statism. It's not personal. I criticized G W Bush in the same manner
at 15:42 on February 19th, 2009
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/here-comes-nanny-sam a recent NP article where I was critical of Bush
at 16:25 on February 19th, 2009
There are alternative choices, yet no one wants to hear them since they involve major changes and are a bit scary at first since it would put out of work 70% of the people for a short time like 3 to 6 month however it would give them work again yet not with the same system and not in the same industry and it would take all the power away from Wall Street and lobbyist. There are way to fix this mess. The bail out is just going to delay the inevitable by a couple of Years. We had a couple of post out to that regard here on NP. I agree with your PS.
at 16:38 on February 19th, 2009
Thanks for commenting sir, I am very open to reading some of the other posts if you can find the links. I certainly hope we can find a serious solution to this very serious problem
at 16:55 on February 19th, 2009
A sample of post that Deal with this and related issues to our present crisis.
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/ireland-recession-measures-criticised
http://my.nowpublic.com/environment/world-bank-loans-exacerbate-climate-change
http://my.nowpublic.com/environment/revenge-gaia-humanity-under-attack
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/solar-power-restart-economy-and-create-jobs-world-wide
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/end-hope-world-catching-fire
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/freitar-uprising-japan
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/europe-has-side-russia-and-break-away-usa
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/global-common-currency-avoid-another-financial-crisis
http://my.nowpublic.com/tag/Geonomics
I only put does up that I remembered best and could find easily.
at 15:39 on February 19th, 2009
specifically speaking of the current "bailout bill" Amy my answer is authoritatively yes. This bill did little in the way of bailout. the only so called shovel ready project is a gambling train from LA to LV (between the districts of Pelosi and Reed no coincidence) the The simple porkulous portion of the bill all politiziced, government building initiatives. The infrastructure portion wont create new jobs it will just fund contractors who are already building highways and bridges etc at 100% capacity for years to come. I intern for Congressman Denny Rehberg here and Billings and trust me I have looked at this thing inside and out. I think Republicans and Democrats have it way wrong here. Innovative, revolutionary measures are what is needed. What about massive deficit reduction measures which would increase the value of the dollar, ending many of the U.S. foreign entanglements which would save billions, and a 10 year moratorium on corporate taxes which are currently 2nd highest in the world. This would send every busines in the world stumbling over themselves to create jobs in North America. Our politicians would rather keep playing games than look out for you and I.
at 16:29 on February 19th, 2009
I'm just concerned as to what happens to us as a society when we stop extending our hands out to our fellow man. I suppose the solution is never to just throw more money at the problem and hope it will stick - that's a fix, not a solution.
at 16:40 on February 19th, 2009
You are so very right! I think very highly of that whole loving thy neighbor thing. It is in times as dark as these that love between each other is many times all we have and sadly the only way some of us will make it through to the other side.
at 15:44 on February 19th, 2009
Thanks for this.
at 15:46 on February 19th, 2009
Thanks Jarret you have my appreciation. I think it is time we demand accountability from our politicians regardless of party affiliation.
at 16:22 on February 19th, 2009
Nice reporting. I think though, Obama has abandoned his "Hope and Change" mantra into a "Fear and Crisis" strategy within a matter of a couple of weeks.
You're also correct in your observation that sometimes things will break and fail and too big too fail, is a fallacy.
at 16:43 on February 19th, 2009
Fear indeed, in order to ram through the bill without anyone reading it. As I said before I intern for Montana's congressman and I have read this bill. People just don't understand how little stimulating this thing really does.
at 17:04 on February 19th, 2009
Spot on, my friend. Spot on.
There seem to be some pretty blind comments back at you here from the bleeding hearts. Pretty obvious what we should be doing instead. Embracing a work ethic, a sink-or-swim philosophy, and sovereign freedoms, not to mention sound fiscal policy. Do we need to explain what this is? I've always thought it was obvious and simple: Work hard, and spend exactly what you have OR LESS. Then again, I have never been a product of premature or unseemly sensory gratification.
I am with you in cautious optimism. I am personally not taking on any fresh debt, but I will be exercising my purchasing power in the economy. I will suffer through the delight of earning this purchasing power. Everyone, now please refer to and resemble my example.
One thing is certain: Voting will change AGAIN in this country. I just hope it's soon enough.
-JW
at 17:07 on February 19th, 2009
Good stuff Phil great to see you on site.
at 17:17 on February 19th, 2009
VINSTER!!! been a while my man.Love the new profile picture. What is your website addy? I have been researching ufology for a report lately and remember that you were pretty knowledgeable on the subject. Good to see you...Cheers
at 17:29 on February 19th, 2009
I have sent a PM with the address don't want to Spam!
at 17:32 on February 19th, 2009
thanks bro
at 19:01 on February 19th, 2009
Obumbler?
How can anyone take an oppostion article seriously when the author is lacing petulantly juvenile insults through out the entire bloody thing?
I'm not saying there aren't valid points to refute the 2nd half of TARP, but this kind of middling whining is why we can't have serious debate in the U.S. Honestly, do you think having 70% of the population go into utter indigence is going to help our current state of affairs?
In theory I like libertarian ideals as much as the next person, but listen, the U.S. doesn't live in a vacuum. This sort of "fingers-in our ears" thought process is why we are here in the first damn place.
Now the whole world is paying for it.
at 19:13 on February 19th, 2009
The same way people take revered authors like Mark Steyn seriously. I am not seriously comparing myself to The Steyn, but the humor, satire, and sarcasm are added for effect. Dont be so pedanticle. If your ostentation were applied universally, John Stewart, Steven Colbert, and the entire satirist industry would go broke. I will certainly try and take my fingers from my ears more in the future.
at 20:07 on February 19th, 2009
Honestly, I'm far from bookish. I enjoy good satire, tearing down sacred cows and the like. Some of the best Brit satarists immediately come to mind (Bryon &Cruikshank).
The greatest satire deals with subtle irony, not to be wise, but I think yours is pretty amature. And in regards to Stewart, Colbert, and others....just because you've gotten the spotlight doesn't mean you're a capable satrist. I certainly don't claim to be. My satire would probably just middling as yours. Truly, not trying to take offense.
Whatever, I didn't intend to get into a clash about comedies.
I'll allow it....
at 20:42 on February 19th, 2009
I truly appreciate the fact that you'll allow it. With humility and temperance I dare venture into the vast desert known as British humor.
at 21:02 on February 19th, 2009
I apologize for the misunderstanding.
"I'll allow it.." means let's just for get this whole thing in American English.
at 21:24 on February 19th, 2009
Just trying to get a rise out of you chappy...I am only poking fun.
at 21:58 on February 19th, 2009
"Just trying to get a rise out of you chappy...I am only poking fun."
Don't Bother.
I'm a Brit we're practical about everything. Well, almost. j/k
Still, I must admit at least from having been in both places Yanks have a hard time of accepting differing opinions and constructive criticism. All of the that self-entitlement, perhaps? :-p
at 22:04 on February 19th, 2009
Self entitlement indeed, we rule the world and we learned our crassness well from our imperial forefathers
at 22:34 on February 19th, 2009
"we rule the world..."
Psst, sorry to bother, but Hu Jintao would like to have a word.
They said it's something about mutually reinforcing markets or something or other...
;-)
Night.
at 06:04 on February 20th, 2009
This is an excellent post.
Well-written, informative, easy to read and, as some of the comments prove, very relevant and with just a little dose of provocation. Great!
My take? It's a little early to know where his policies will lead us all. Things are just too volatile right now and no-one knows how this will pan out over the next month, never mind the next year.
Let's just wish him luck, for all our sake's....
Thank you