BBC Defends, Ditches Controversial Uganda Gay Execution Poll

by Rhonda J Mangus | December 17, 2009 at 01:36 am
660 views | 28 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

BBC Defends, Ditched Controversial Uganda Gay Execution Poll

BBC Defends, Ditched Controversial Uganda Gay Execution Poll

see larger image

uploaded by Rhonda J Mangus

After initially defending a controversial poll which asked readers "Should homosexuals face execution?" in Uganda, the BBC ditched the poll after coming under fire from gay rights groups, and replaced it with a more moderate question, "Should Uganda debate gay execution?"

The BBC came under fire Wednesday from gay activists, who bombarded news blogs and attacked the BBC on Twitter. The original poll question sparked debate, including comments suggesting that the United Kingdom should follow in Uganda’s footsteps and impose a death penalty for gays and lesbians.

Uganda is currently debating the proposed "kill the gays" bill which would make homosexuality punishable by life imprisonment or death.

Senior political figures throughout the UK were quick to complain. Lynne Featherstone, a liberal democratic member of parliament, wrote to the BBC general director.

"I would be the first person to stand up for open debate and free speech, but any conversation that starts 'should homosexuals face execution' is completely skewed and unacceptable in this forum. Suggesting that the state-sponsored murder of gay people is OK as a legitimate topic for debate is deeply offensive. The BBC are only fanning the flames of hatred as many of the comments demonstrate. They must act and apologize for their gross insensitivity."

Before the poll was changed, BBC’s World Service Africa Program editor David Stead issued the following statement: "We agree that it is a stark and challenging question, but think that it accurately focuses on and illustrates the real issue at stake. If Uganda's democratically elected MPs vote to proceed with the Anti-Homosexuality Bill this week they will bring onto the statute book legislation that could condemn people to death for some homosexual activities.

"We published it alongside clear explanatory text which gave the context of the bill itself. And as we said at the top of our debate page, we accept it is a stark and disturbing question. But this is the reality behind the bill. This issue has already sparked much debate around the world and understandably led to us receiving many emails and texts. We have sought to moderate these rigorously while at the same time trying to reflect the varied and hugely diverse views about homosexuality in Africa."


Take Action: Tell Uganda To Respect Human Rights And Dismiss the Anti-Homosexuality Bill

Previously on NowPublic by this Author:

White House condemns Uganda's Anti-Gay Bill (Dec. 13, '09)
Uganda to drop death penalty, life imprisonment for gays
(Dec. 10, '09)
No visible ties, Christian leaders denounce Uganda anti-gay bill (Dec. 9, '09)
It's not so invisible anymore: 'The Family's' influence in Uganda
(Nov. 28, '09)
Brown joins Harper against Uganda's Anti-homosexuality Bill 2009
(Nov. 28, '09)
Harper to raise issue of Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill at Summit
(Nov. 26, '09)
US fundamentalist group at heart of Uganda's anti-gay law
(November 26, '09)
Uganda anti-gay bill has potential to divide Commonwealth leaders
(Nov. 25, '09)
Museveni claims European gays are 'recruiting' Ugandan citizens
(Nov. 23, '09)
Jefferson Awards winner recognizes genocide looming in Uganda
(Oct. 21, '09)
Uganda's Daily Monitor raises its voice on behalf of defenseless
(Oct. 20, '09)
Did Exodus conference in Uganda unleash anti-gay vigilantism?
(Oct. 19, '09)
Human rights groups blast Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009 (Oct. 18, '09)
Exodus International Holding Bryce Faulkner Hostage? (July 16, '09)

Find related stories on NowPublic Special News Coverage channels here and here.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Maybe the BBC should have condemned the fact that a democratically elected government would even discuss this in 2009. 

1
Rhonda J Mangus

Good point, ACP! The BBC (as you can see from the additional information provided) has been criticized before in relation to homosexuality:


This is not the first time the BBC has been criticised this year in relation to homosexuality. A poll for PinkNews.co.uk in March found that 69 per cent of LGBT people thought that the corporation was "institutionally homophobic."
In October, regulator the BBC Trust ruled that corporation reinforced homophobic stereotypes in 'lesbian jokes' about bisexual star Lindsay Lohan.

In March, The media regulator Ofcom has found the BBC in breach of the Broadcasting Code following allegations by members of the public of homophobia towards the gay singer Will Young by BBC Radio 1 Breakfast host Chris Moyles.

Eight people complained to Ofcom about an episode of Chris Moyles Breakfast programme broadcast on January 20th 2009 where the DJ discussed the birthday of the Pop Idol winner Will Young. During the broadcast, Moyles imitated the singer by singing alternative versions to his well known singles 'Evergreen' and 'Leave Right Now. During both songs, the media regulator found that Moyles "adopted an effeminate and high pitched voice."

In May, Jonathan Ross defended allegations that he made a 'homophobic' joke when he said "If your son asks for a Hannah Montana MP3 player, you might want to already think about putting him down for adoption before he brings his… erm… partner home."

In July, Culture Secretary Ben Bradshaw (who is himself gay) told PinkNews.co.uk that he would 'examine' claims of homophobia made against the BBC.

Thanks for reading, commenting, and for the rec!:)


0
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Considering that the BBC also gets accused of being too progressive in its reporting, this anti-homosexual attitude is somewhat surprising. 

0
pike

"If homosexuality is natural, as we are forced to believe, how can they sustain the species ? I suggest all gays are put on a remote island somewhere and left for a generation - afterwhich, theoretically there shoild be none left.   Uganda is a soverign state that should be left to handle its matters. we have a culture and social norms. why should the white impose their morals on us. when america went to Iraq despite the opposition by the other countries why is it that it has never been criticised.   People have misunderstood the ugandan bill. The death stence is for the aggravated cases just like it is with  heterosexuals. why should a homo who has abused a child or youth disabled person be favoured when  a heterosexual who does the same thing is setenced to death. why should a murderer be killed and a homo left.   May be the death setence should be removed worldwide for all cases. But the fact remains we shall not let homos take away the rights of others just because they want to force peple to believe their evil ways. Homo are sick people who need to be told that what they are doing is wrong and should leave it. Coz if a dog can tell difference between a male and female then how much more for a human being who was created with an intelligence above that of a dog.   Homos we want you to change and be what you are supposed to be.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

mudricky
First Flagged at 1:56 AM, Dec 17, 2009 by mudricky
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (28)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from