Ben Kinsella Stabbing Analysed in TIME Magazine: Violent Britain

by Christina 123 | July 16, 2008 at 01:39 pm
665 views | 0 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

Ben Kinsella Stabbing Analysed in TIME Magazine: Violent Britain

Ben Kinsella Stabbing Analysed in TIME Magazine: Violent Britain

see larger image

uploaded by Christina 123

Can Britain Save its Wayward Youth? Wednesday, Jul. 16, 2008 By CATHERINE MAYER / LONDON Enlarge Photo Floral tributes are left at the scene where British teenager Ben Kinsella was killed in a stabbing, in London, on June 30, 2008. Shaun Curry / AFP / Getty Article Tools

Purpose-built for the poor, the tenement block has never seen good days, but someone once cared enough to decorate its narrow hall with a print of a wide-eyed child. Now a real child, no more than two years old, dirty and distressed, holds himself up on the open door. Police officers Nick Weston and Amanda Lovegrove have come to this housing project in Hackney, a London borough northeast of the city center, to investigate reports of a knife attack. They are arresting the toddler's uncle, who admits brandishing a kitchen blade but says he was just protecting the child from its drug-addicted mother. Weston tried to question the mom, still in her teens but with the sunken face of an old woman. "All she can tell us about the child's dad is that he's called John," he says. "What hope do kids like this have?"

Britain is a rich country, but a sizable minority of its children live in squalor, their prospects occluded by their bad start in life. Social mobility is low compared to other advanced nations — 31% of children in inner London and 22% nationally are growing up in poverty, which will be deepened by spiraling fuel and food costs and a stuttering job market. More than 9% of 16- to 18-year-olds are not currently in any form of education, employment or job training.

It should come as no surprise, then, that youth policy dominates Britain's political agenda as never before. But what's really grabbed the attention of well-heeled parliamentarians is a spate of unrelated murders. What links the crimes is the use of a weapon — usually a knife, sometimes a gun — casually wielded because the victim had looked askance at his killer (most victims are boys) or offered some other insignificant provocation. Last year 27 teenagers were murdered in London, many by other teenagers. This year's toll has already reached 20, and includes Robert Knox, an 18-year-old actor who plays a trainee wizard in the forthcoming Harry Potter movie, and who was reportedly killed defending his brother in a brawl over a stolen mobile phone. On July 1 hundreds of demonstrators marched through Islington, Hackney's neighboring borough, to protest the knifing outside a local pub of 16-year-old Ben Kinsella, a straight-A student whose sister starred in a popular TV soap opera. Nine days later, four Londoners were knifed to death in separate incidents during the same 24-hour period, among them Melvin Bryan, who would have celebrated his 19th birthday two days later.

Despite banner headlines warning of a "Broken Britain," the country remains relatively safe. The homicide rate of 1.6 per 100,000 in England and Wales compares favorably with the 5.9 per 100,000 in the United States. Overall crime figures are down by a third since the ruling Labour Party was voted into power in 1997, and London has actually seen a reduction in most violent offenses in recent years.

But if the anxiety generated by street violence is disproportionate, public concerns about young Britons are far from unfounded. Simply venture into London's West End late on a Saturday night to witness the national pastime of binge-drinking with its attendant brawls and mishaps. Young British men fighting on the streets is hardly news, but the development that has raised alarm bells is the widespread carrying of weapons. Teachers report increases in the number of pupils bringing knives to school, claiming to carry them for protection against their peers — the same reason they cite for joining the gangs that are proliferating in British cities. Children here are fearful and, according to a controversial 2007 UNICEF report, unhappier than their counterparts in other Western countries.

Once the Labour party might have blamed such ills on Britain's deep social inequalities, nowhere more clearly drawn than in parts of London such as Hackney and Islington where slums abut some of the most desirable housing stock in the capital. But such analysis would be uncomfortable for a party that has ruled the country for more than a decade. "Antisocial behavior ... is first and foremost the responsibility of the parents," said Prime Minister Gordon Brown ahead of the launch of the Youth Crime Action Plan document published on Tuesday. The plan envisages a tougher enforcement of laws and heavier punishments of young offenders, as well as intensive intervention in 110,000 at-risk households identified by agencies such as the police, social services and education authorities. A pilot scheme involving 90 such families achieved reductions in antisocial behaviors.

The resurgent Conservative Party is also churning out proposals to tackle youth crime. Its smooth young leader David Cameron has more than once referenced New York's success in reducing violent crime by stamping out low-level disorder. But as police officers Weston and Lovegrove respond to another emergency call that takes them to another highrise in Hackney, where another toddler sits on a filthy floor amid dog dirt and discarded needles, it's clear that a growing number of young Britons may be irretrievably damaged before any policy changes percolate through.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
e q u a n i m i t y

There is a public march in London on Sunday 27th July being organised through Facebook, 'Making a stand against knife crime'.  For further information please contact:

0
Bob Macdonald

Having seen the Labour party in action for 11 years, I can now see what the problem is: corruption. Living in inner city London, I can say that it is no wonder the poverty rates are so high, there is next to none of the business start-up support you find in other countries. No support for new media start-ups, no incubators for small, funky young businesses. Just people collecting welfare. The local councils take the tax, but provide next to no services (most of the tax money goes on the welfare payments). This is a dangerous policy and one that sure as sun the rises, causes poverty. It already feels like London's best days are now passed.

0
Merc Bob

Wow, not really very surprising to Americans at all, i truly feel for the British people i really do. Your world has become a living hell of immorality, criminals dictating who lives and who dies and victimization because of dumbfounded ignorant laws which are a result of socialistic governmental control over your entire existence. You folks really are your own worst enemies. Let me explain why:

First, you ban all forms of guns or make it so difficult for the general public to posses one for protection that the criminal element have absolutely nothing to fear ...and criminals sure as hell don't fear unarmed people. They know right from the start they have the upper hand on moral, loving, British citizens when they posses weapons that the general public can not posses ...they just simply force themselves on you at their own discretion.

Tell me, what fear should they have of the law when the primary reason for owning a gun or knife in Britain is to violate the law in the first place? I'll tell you, none at all.

Second, when you banned guns then the alternative becomes stabbing, now you are having social issues with stabbings taking the place of hand gun crimes as well as stabbings, are you gonna ban all knives next? As this rate of murders will not decrease with more legislation, it will only increase as people become more and more violent and more defenseless in their own homes. What comes after that, you gonna ban cricket bats, automobiles and eventually darts?

See, there's one thing that Americans understand that the rest of the world forgot in this rise to industrialism, weapons of all types will "always" exist as long as man exists and possesses an evil heart and is willing to use them ...but when the person you are trying to kill possesses the same weapon you posses the inclination to use that weapon to victimize a law abiding citizen decreases substantially. Criminals fear only one thing, sure death! That is why there are only two things that can be done to change this murderous statistic in Britain, as we understand this better here in the United States through experience, make guns legal to law abiding people as death it is the only "TRUE" deterrent in the mind of a criminal. This is simply a moral issue, not one of government control. The government can only control so much of anything. Instilling a little fear of God/Jesus Christ wouldn't hurt either.          

We Americans really feal for you over there, you have cameras everwhere now because the criminals can not be controled any longer ...there are probably cameras being installed in your bedroom as we speak. And you've lost almost all of your civil/God given rights and have been made to become victims by your politicians and liberal ideologies. I know the media like to tell you otherwise, but America is a FAR more safe country with weapons then Britain is without them. I really hope you learn to reject this liberal ideal of governmental control soon. We'd hate to see the Magna Carta abolished and the British people lose all their freedoms.

Good luck! Keep a stiff upper lip, we Americans are pulling for you!     

0
Martin Smith

it`s they`re culture know what I mean innit ?

0
Trofim

Ah, Martin, I think you mean "their"

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from