NP Rank:
Best of all possible worlds
When Leaders Take Charge
When the budgeting and debt reduction plans are completed this week (crossing fingers and toes) the American System will once again demonstrate 1) the ugliness of democratic sausage making, 2) a more sound and stable footing, 3) true leadership demonstrated by all branches of government, and 4) a way ahead.
If you are watching, Obama, Boehner, and McConnell have moved closer to working together. Harry Reid is sublimated. Nancy Pelosi is on her high horse in the barn for the moment.
If we can raise the debt limit, swallow a spending reduction pill, and accommodate a modest effort to seize needed and lost revenue, we can expect the natural order of things to happen:
· Drawdown from battlefields – defense expense reduction
· Modification of Social Security qualifying criteria – age and means testing
· Revisiting healthcare with greater collaboration
· Renewing manufacturing America
· Aggressively changing America’s sources of energy
· Increasing GDP from American production
· Being more selective about sources of borrowing
Let’s see.
“Top lawmakers target ‘grand bargain’ for debt plan
By Alec MacGillis and Lori Montgomery, Published: July 16
Even as President Obama and congressional leaders focus on a fallback plan to lift the nation’s debt ceiling, top Democrats and Republicans have begun to map a new way to craft the same sort of ambitious deficit-cutting plan they abandoned last week.
As part of the deal being discussed to raise the debt ceiling, leaders on Capitol Hill are forming an especially powerful congressional committee that would be charged with drawing up a new “grand bargain,” possibly by the end of the year.
Key elements for a big deal remain in place. Obama has been clear that he wants one and has started making the case to skeptical factions of his own party that getting the nation’s fiscal house in order is in their best interest. House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) also remains committed to an ambitious plan, having told his troops that he didn’t become speaker to do small things. And, perhaps most critically, the markets are demanding it. The credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s says Washington must agree to reduce the debt by $4 trillion over 10 years to avert a downgrade.
“We cannot as a country fail to deal with the debt threat,” said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), one of the bipartisan “Gang of Six”senators who tried to reach an agreement in recent months. “Every serious economic analysis tells us we’ve reached the danger zone. And just kicking the can down the road? That can’t be. We’re better than that. We’ve got to be better than that.”
But hopes for a grand resolution in coming months face the same question that hangs over the current crisis: whether tea-party-aligned conservatives in Congress who forced the debt-ceiling showdown will provide the necessary votes for an eventual major deal, even if it includes new taxes.
The Gang of Six — which tried to come up with its own plan — disbanded last week after failing to reach agreement on how to cut spending and raise taxes. Meanwhile, the big deal pursued by Obama and Boehner faltered amid criticism from congressional Republicans opposed to additional revenue.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), who has emerged as the leader of this contingent, has argued against such a deal. But his views may be shifting along with those of some rank-and-file House Republicans whose imaginations have been captivated by the idea of slicing as much as $5 trillion out of the federal budget over the next decade.
In a caucus meeting last week, some freshmen wanted to know whether they could slice that much out of the budget in the next two years, GOP aides said. (Answer: no. The entire federal government is expected to spend about $3.6 trillion this year.)
In public at least, conservatives are maintaining that the answer is to “cut, cap and balance” — passing a balanced-budget amendment that would cap federal spending at 18 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product, down from its current 24 percent.
The House is expected to vote Tuesday on such an amendment, but it has scant odds of getting the needed supermajority in the Senate. Democrats say an 18 percent cap in a country with an aging population and rising health-care costs would lead to ruinous cuts.”
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 06:59 on July 17th, 2011
Your fraudulent Government at work. Obama and Geithner's slight of hand as they rob the people and shuffle the books for re-election and stiff the American workers future social security net.<br></P>On the Road to US Government Debt Default. Jul.10/2011Legally, the Federal government is a month away from bankruptcy. The government, under the direction of Treasury Secretary Geithner, is borrowing money from Federal employees' pension funds to keep the doors open. It's an accounting trick. First, the Federal government funds the pension funds with money. Second, the funds buy Treasury bonds. Third, the government immediately spends the money. It's like Social Security, whose Trust Fund is a pile of IOUs from the government. In mid-May, the government unilaterally defaulted on those Federal pension fund IOUs. That action wiped the obligations off the books. That in turn has allowed the government to operate legally. That is because its total debt is now lower than it was before the default.<br></P>There are two funds involved: the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund and the Thrift Savings Plan's Government Securities Investment Fund, known as the G Fund. Both are invested in government bonds, which count as borrowing against the national debt ceiling. Under the Treasury Department's strategy, the government trims the two funds' holdings in those bonds. For the 2½-month period from mid-May until Aug. 2, that's supposed to free up about $214 billion in "headroom" against the debt ceiling, thus allowing the government to borrow a similar amount of money from other sources to keep paying its bills<br></P> "Federal retirees and employees will be unaffected by these actions," Geithner wrote in a letter to lawmakers earlier this week. By law, those accounts must eventually be made whole. The department took similar "extraordinary measures" in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2006; each time, the G Fund and the CSRDF were made whole with back interest once the ceiling was raised. No one is using the D-word: default, but this is what the procedure really is. This has gone on so often in the past that no one in Washington blinks an eye. It's business as usual. The government pretends that the legal IOUs that it has been presenting to the funds in exchange for real money have been wiped off the books. This is solvency, Washington style. The public does not understand any of this. It also does not understand that the Social Security Trust Fund is a pile of IOUs from the government. Even worse, these IOUs are not counted as on-budget. They are off-budget. What makes the two Federal pension funds different from Social Security is that they are on-budget; hence, by wiping them off the books, the government ducked the debt ceiling bullet. Naturally, new payments are being postponed. That means that the government is spending the money owed to the funds without bothering to issue any IOUs. This saves the government a few million. Every penny counts! This concealed default, when coupled with a reallocation of the monthly "contributions" to the two funds, is all that stands between government spending and the debt ceiling. If that crash takes place in August, there will be a far greater reallocation of government revenues.<br></P>Geithner says that the government will hit the legal debt limit in early August. Nobody knows if he is bluffing. He may have a few other rabbits in his hat, but if so, they are new. The tried-and-true rabbit of defaulting temporarily on Federal pensions has been pulled out of the hat. He says that, once the crisis is behind us, meaning after the Republican House has voted to increase the debt ceiling, that the government will replace the missing pension fund IOUs. If he really believes this scenario, then he is admitting that the politicians are involved in a grand charade. It's all for show. There will be a deal. Geithner is saying that the temporary accounting games the government is playing with the Federal pension funds is part of a political charade. But if the deal cannot be worked out in August, then the Federal government will stop paying more of its bills. We have not been told which ones will not be paid. There will not be an overnight shutdown of the government, but some people who think they have guaranteed salaries or who think they have contracts with the government will find that these promises – these IOUs – are not worth the paper they are written on . . . until the Republican House quits stalling and does what everyone in Washington knows is inevitable. Until then, the contracts will not count when the government is over its spending limit. We are witnessing kabuki theater in a pre-election year. This is why there has been no deal among Obama, the Democrat-controlled Senate, and the Republican-controlled House. They are doing a kind of mating dance about how they are ready to deal, just so long as the others want to deal. But the only thing between official bankruptcy and today is the on-going raid on the pension funds.<br></P> Think about this. Government workers spent years contributing to these funds – taking IOUs – and Geithner is treating the funds as convenient cookie jars. He has assured the victims of this contract-breaking, crisis-delaying theft of $214 billion of IOUs that the government will replenish the cookie jars just as soon as the crisis is over.<br></P>Until such time that the debt ceiling is legally raised, Washington will continue to rob Peter to pay Paul. Of course, this is the premise of Washington politics at all times, but this time, the victimized Peters are government employees. This is the sweet fiscal irony of the budget impasse. The middlemen in the great Peter-to-Paul wealth transfer programs are finding that they have become the targets of the senior administrators of the great heist. Instead of taxpayers coming up with the money to finance the transfers, the middlemen are. Civil-Service-protected, salaried employees of the government are now on the paying side of the wealth-transfer process. It could not have happened to a more deserving bunch.<br></P> Here is what impresses me most. First, the default on $214 billion of Treasury debt did not get a headline on the front pages of America's press. This was not a prime-time story on the evening news shows. Second, the arcane nature of the retirement fund programs remains arcane. The public does not understand that the great heist is long behind us. It has been going on since 1937. Political deception is part of the American way of life. It is right up there with mom and apple pie. In fact, it's way above mom and apple pie. The tell-all biographies of the children of famous celebrities have long-since undermined mom, and the food police are after apple pie. But nobody writes a best-selling book called Franklin Dearest on the origins of Social Security. Third, there are no legal repercussions of a default on $214 billion of government debt. There are no class-action lawsuits. How could there be? The Federal government is legally sovereign. It cannot be sued in any Federal court unless it consents to the lawsuit.<br></P> This should send a message to anyone who is alert to what is going on. The U.S. government can default at any time. It is not bound by law. If, in order to obey one law, such as the debt ceiling, senior officials think it should violate another law, such as keeping pension fund obligations on the books, someone is going to get stiffed. Politics will decide who gets stiffed.<br></P>
at 07:13 on July 17th, 2011
Source: nytimes.com
So, it seems, after some TEA Party freshmen in the House of Representatives were given a Star Wars analogy by Rep. Ryan, not sure if the Empire's Death Star was used to promote fear, they seemed a little worried. Let's see where that goes.