Best auditor of WikiLeaks impact is CIA

by YankeeJim | December 22, 2010 at 06:14 am

166 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

One would hope that the CIA will 1) triage and assess the impact of leaks especially to international relations and individuals affected, 2) determine what measures are necessary: technical and procedural, to prevent leaks, 3) determine how to detect leaks and potential leaks to accelerate mitigation.

A long time ago, the CIA had a concept called “warmware.” It was pretty much like Microsoft Outlook feature that tracked application usage by individuals with a complete trail of time on an off and file access. Of course that technology is greatly advanced today, such that it is possible to track and monitor all people who have access to confidential and secret information to ensure their authorized, credentialed, and privileged use of information.

In the instance of the Army leaker, it was just bonehead deficiencies in policy and lack of supervision that resulted in the leak, not a technology deficiency.

“CIA launches task force to assess impact of U.S. cables' exposure by WikiLeaks

By Greg Miller

Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 22, 2010; 12:24 AM

The CIA has launched a task force to assess the impact of the exposure of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables and military files by WikiLeaks.

Officially, the panel is called the WikiLeaks Task Force. But at CIA headquarters, it's mainly known by its all-too-apt acronym: W.T.F.

The irreverence is perhaps understandable for an agency that has been relatively unscathed by WikiLeaks. Only a handful of CIA files have surfaced on the WikiLeaks Web site, and records from other agencies posted online reveal remarkably little about CIA employees or operations.

Even so, CIA officials said the agency is conducting an extensive inventory of the classified information, which is routinely distributed on a dozen or more networks that connect agency employees around the world.

And the task force is focused on the immediate impact of the most recently released files. One issue is whether the agency's ability to recruit informants could be damaged by declining confidence in the U.S. government's ability to keep secrets.

"The director asked the task force to examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations," CIA spokesman George Little said. The panel is being led by the CIA's Counterintelligence Center but has more than two dozen members from departments across the agency.

To some agency veterans, WikiLeaks has vindicated the CIA's long-standing aversion to sharing secrets with other government agencies, a posture that came under sharp criticism after it was identified as a factor that contributed to the nation's failure to prevent the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Even while moving to share more information over the past decade, the agency "has not capitulated to this business of making everything available to outsiders," said a former high-ranking CIA official who recently retired. "They don't even make everything available to insiders. And by and large the system has worked."

CIA veterans said most of the agency's international correspondence is classified at the "Secret" level, same as the records that ended up online. But the agency has always insisted on using its own systems.

As recently as two years ago, the agency rejected a request to make more of its intelligence reports available on the SIPRNET, the classified network used by the Pentagon to pass information around the world.

"We simply said we weren't going to do it," another former CIA official said. "The consensus was there were simply too many people potentially who had access."

The former officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss agency security measures.”