BNP spokesman Sanaullah Baloch rejects APC

by maliksiraj | June 6, 2009 at 03:15 am
272 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Sanaullah Baloch, centeral secretary information of BNP

Sanaullah Baloch, centeral secretary information of BNP

see larger image

uploaded by maliksiraj

By Malik Siraj Akbar



In the wilderness of Balochistan, former Senator Sanaullah Baloch, central secretary information of the Balochistan National Party (BNP), is wonderful man to exchange views with on the politics of Balochistan. Unquestionably, I consider him as the smartest of all Baloch politicians. He is an articulate speaker and a remarkable writer.
One of the reasons for my liking for Sana is that he does not come from an elite or tribal background. Sana is truly a self-made person who comes from a middle class Baloch family.
It is not bed of roses in this tribal society to survive as a politician until you have very strong roots in the tribal system, possess huge lands and share links with the mafia. Sana does not have these advantages yet he, in my views, is the best of all the Baloch politicians in terms of his understanding and presentation of the Baloch case.
I met Sana over lunch at his residence in Sattalite Town of Quetta. We mainly spoke about the upcoming All Parties Conferences on Balochistan being convened by Prime Minister Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani.
It is true that the success of this APC largely depends on the response given by the Baloch nationalist parties and armed groups. Prior to a formal announcement by the government of the schedule and the agenda of the proposed APC, I wanted to ascertain Sana’s views on the government plans to resolve the Balochistan issue through an APC.



MALIK: What is the BNP response to Premier Gillani’s decision to convene an APC on Balochistan?



SANAULLAH BALOCH: There is no need for an APC on Balochistan because one does not still see a policy change in Balochistan since the arrival of the PPP into power. Such conferences are held by the government only to gain media publicity. They are meant to divert attention from the actual issues of Balochistan. The government uses such conferences as a pretext to hold the Baloch nationalists responsible for the failure of talks in case the Establishment hampers the breakthrough and progress in talks between Balochistan and the Center.
We do not need all political parties to cogitate on the Balochistan issue because there are only two parties involved in the conflict: The Baloch and the Establishment/Centre. An APC would be spoiled if different political parties participate and waste the opportunity by coming up with their own lists of complaints and suggestions. Since the Balochs have solely been the victims of the conflict, we want the Baloch and Islamabad to directly negotiate without the presence of other political parties, whom we consider irrelevant at this occasion..



MALIK: Do you not think this APC would become more meaningful after saner voices, such as the one from Nawaz Sharif, seem to be supporting the idea?



SB: Basically, APCs in the past have always proved to be a sheer waste of time. They do not resolve political disputes. The reason I keep saying that we do not need an APC is because the Balochs are not at war with a single political party. It is the Center that has waged a war against the province. If Nawaz Sharif is sincere towards the settlement of the Balochistan issue, he should give a civil disobedience call to all the Punjabi civil and military officers posted in Balochistan to stop killing the Balochs, arresting our political activists and adding to the miseries of the Baloch people. We expect the Punjabis to stand united with the Baloch at this juncture. They should cooperate with us as enthusiastically as was seen during the judicial movement.



MALIK:It seems that the Baloch nationalists are running away from negotiations by making one excuse or the other. How can you reject an APC on the basis of assumptions and fears that you have even not experienced yet?



SB: We are not running way from talks. The Baloch political parties passionately participated in the Mushahid Hussain-led committee even though the country was being ruled by a military dictator. Yet, the committee, which was responsible to give its recommendations on Balochistan in 90 days, failed to table recommendations after 900 days.
How are negotiations going to succeed when Islamabad does not recognize the conflict in Balochistan? What does it mean when the federal government talks of an APC on the one hand and accuses us of getting external assistance on the other hand? Someone in the Center bills as ‘anti-state’ and the other describes as ‘traitors’. In different phases of the history, the Balochs were dubbed as the agents of India, Afghanistan, Iran and even Iraq. No one truly heeded our democratic demands.
The government should prove by its actions that it is trying to build confidence in the province. Even if one or two culprits responsible for causing bloodshed in Balochistan are brought to justice, it will bolster the Baloch confidence.



MALIK: So does it mean that the BNP will boycott the APC?



SB: Yes, we have no intentions to join the APC. Islamabad does not need to engage different non-Baloch political parties in talks about Balochistan. It should only talk to the actual representatives of the Baloch people because the actors and the victims of the conflict are the Balochs.
Until everyone, including the leaders from the BNP, National Party (NP), the Balochistan Republican Party (BRP), Jamori Watan Party (JWP), Baloch National Front (BNF) and all the armed groups, are taken on board, efforts for rapprochement are likely to fizzle out. Regardless of the demands of the separatists, they should be recognized as a concerned player in the conflict in Balochistan and invited to negotiate.
The level of mistrust between the Baloch and Islamabad has reached such a high level that we will not achieve any results without having “international mediation” between the province and the center.



MALIK What do you mean by “international mediation”? Who is acceptable to the Baloch as a mediator?



SB: We do not trust Islamabad. The Establishment will surely make every effort to sabotage talks between the Baloch and the Center. Therefore, we think that the United Nations or the European Union or some internationally reputed individuals, whom the Baloch should be entitled to nominate once Islamabad concedes to this demand, should be allowed to work as a mediator or observer to monitor the talks between the province and the Center. This will minimize the possibility of sabotage of negotiations. If we have no problems with a foreign mediator, why should Islamabad have any? Let the world know who is being naughty here.



MALIK:Do you think the Pashtoons of Balochistan should be included in the détente?



SB: The Pashtoons have always supported the Baloch struggle and demands. However, the current conflict entirely revolves around the Baloch people. The Pashtoons have not faced military operation, disappearances, torture, freezing of bank accounts, enlisting of names in the Exit Control List (ECL) and suppression. If a long-term settlement of the Baloch issue is desired then we can go forward even by excluding the Pashtoons.
We expect Mahmood Khan Achakzai, the leader of the Pashtoonkhawa Milli Awami Party, to respect the Baloch sentiments. If the Baloch parties boycott the APC, he should not pretend to represent the Baloch on such a platform. We deeply respect him but he has no mandate to represent the Baloch case.


recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
srk420

I have written in one of my earlier write ups that the real objectives of USA to invade and occupy Afghanistan were not to punish the Taliban for not handing over Osama bin Laden and to destroy the so-called terror network of Al-Qaeda but to create safe and reliable routes to transport energy resources of Central Asian Republics (CAR) to its homeland. Its other regional objectives included keeping a watch on Russia and Iran, containment of China, making India a bulwark against China and ascendant power of South Asia, a key player in Afghan affairs and reducing Pakistan to a satellite of India after its denuclearization. For the realization of its primary objective, it had to ensure that Balochistan provided the desired energy corridor through Gwadar and Pasni. India too never desired Pakistan to become self sufficient economically with the assistance of Chinese by making use of Gwadar Port for import/export with CAR. Entry of China in the Indian Ocean through the shortest route did not suit strategic interests of USA and India. Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline was another sore point which had to be prevented and Iran veered towards Afghanistan by providing road connection with Chahbahar Port to ensure isolation of Pakistan.

Covert operations by CIA and RAW in Balochistan began in January 2002 and in three years the interior was sufficiently subverted; necessary infrastructure put in place in the form of contacts, 58 training camps, provision of all sorts of arms and ammunition, sophisticated communication system and huge funds. Sui-Bugti area was picked up for subversion because of its accessibility from Indo-Pak border through Reti-Rahimyar Khan sector and Kohlu-Kahan area because of a very inhospitable terrain. Bugtis and Marris traditionally antagonistic to each other were wedded for the attainment of stated objectives. Each training camp had 300-500 students. Dissident Sardars of Bugti, Marri and Mengal tribes together with Baloch nationalist parties and quislings agreed to play their game in return for power and material benefits. Motivational nodes suggested to Baloch leaders to win over sympathies of Balochis revolved around economic and political deprivation, Punjab domination and Baloch nationalism. The route to bring in munitions was from Shahgarh-Kishangarh (5 km from eastern border)-Ubaro, Kashmore-Sui-Dera Bugti-Kahan. Afghanistan route via Muslim Bagh and Iran route via Zahidan where an Indian consulate was set up were also used for covert operations. The front was lit up in January 2005 through Dr Shazia rape case, with Nawab Akbar Bugti taking the lead role. 

A shady outfit Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) created by KGB in the 1980s went into oblivion once USSR fragmented in 1991.. It was reactivated by CIA and RAW once Balochistan flared up. The main gas supply routes Sui-Kashmor-Uchch-Multan and Sui-Kashmor-Sukkhar being only 45 km away from border with India were within turnaround radius of RAW saboteurs to blast them at will. The period from 2005 to 2007 saw worst form of terrorist activities. Hardly a day passed when there was no act of sabotage. Gas pipelines, railway lines, electric transmitters, military convoys, police stations were targeted with venom. Quetta too came under repeated bomb and rocket attacks. After a brief spell of army action, the Frontier Corps managed to cope up with the security situation at its own and has kept the army troops free of counter insurgency operations. Things have become relatively quiet after security forces succeeded in destroying most of training camps and keeping a check on supply lines. However, RAW and CIA sponsored subversive activities are continuing unabated.

Nawab Akbar Bugti who led the insurgency from a mountain cave got killed in August 2007 when the cave collapsed because of artillery shelling. He was turned into a hero after his death and became the chief motivating factor for Baloch nationalism which has now peaked and Baloch nationalists are talking of separation without any inhibitions. RAW stepped up its activities in Balochistan from mid 2007 in line with the chalked out plan and increased the discretionary budget of RAW infested Indian consulates in Kandahar, Jalalabad and in Zahidan. Sardar Attaullah Mengal who was in self imposed exile was asked to return to Kohlu to lend strength to the Bugtis and Marris and also to keep a check on Balach Marri who was heading the BLA.  After the death of Balach in end 2007 which caused a temporary setback to his mentors, late Nawab Bugti’s grandson Brahamdagh Bugti was put in his place. He is stationed in Kabul and is pawn of foreign agencies. The BLA H.Q. duly patronized by the two agencies as well as RAM is coordinating sabotage and subversion in Balochistan from Kandahar.  

UNHCR representative John Solecki was abducted from Quetta in early 2009 by BLA members on the directions of Brahamdagh Bugti at a time when UN Chairman was about to visit Islamabad. The abduction was aimed at seeking UN intervention in Balochistan affairs and to exert pressure on Pak government. His release in last April was meant to show softer side of BLA to UN. Brahamdagh stated that the BLA was not a terrorist outfit as alleged but was waging a freedom struggle. Soon after, three Baloch nationalist leaders were found brutally murdered in Turbat under mysterious circumstances. The blame was promptly put on local agencies. Baloch leaders upped the ante and as many as 14 non-locals were gunned down in Quetta. BLA terrorists helped by CIA and RAW were behind the murder of Baloch leaders who had played a key role in the release of Solecki. These Baloch leaders were on the verge of spilling beans about the role of BLA and its mentors. They were murdered to prevent the leakage, destabilize Balochistan, stoke Baloch nationalism and step up the bogey of independent Balochistan. Interior Minister Rehman Malik for the first time forthrightly exposed the role of RAW and dissident elements among the Baloch talking of separation. He however considered it prudent not to name other foreign agencies actively involved in that province to achieve their commercial interests. Non-locals in Balochistan are feeling unsafe and a large number have migrated to Punjab. The MQM supports the cause of Baloch in Balochistan.

Notwithstanding the streaks of separatism seen among dissident Baloch Sardars and Baloch nationalists, the fact of the matter is that the Sardari system has remained the bane of Balochistan and has been a serious impediment in the way of development of the province. This is notwithstanding the perverse role of rulers who cannot be absolved of their failure to redress political and economic grievances of the people of Balochistan. The Baloch Sardars have a history of keeping their people deprived of education and basic amenities of life and have all along treated them as serfs. Greater portion of funds allocated for development works are eaten up by them. They also have a history of selling their loyalties to foreign masters in return for material benefits. Among them Sardars of Marri and Mengal tribes have all along been troublesome and looked towards outside powers for help. Nawab Bugti had always sided with the government and was despised by the people of Balochistan. He was led up the garden path by CIA and RAW and he fell in their trap. Apart from the role of few Baloch Sardars and camp followers, the ordinary Baloch are highly patriotic and honorable. Very big numbers are settled in urban and rural Sindh, in Punjab and in NWFP. There is heavy induction of Baloch in the armed forces particularly in the army. No trace of separatist tendencies is found in them. It is however unfortunate that our rulers instead of establishing communication with them are once again trying to woo the Sardars and are talking of reviving Sardari system that was abolished by Zulifiqar Ali Bhutto in 1973. This trend should be reversed.

0
maliksiraj

ham ney ek bath ki or os ney kamal kardia!

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from