NP Rank:
Body of Jennifer Hudson's nephew found
Chicago police have located the missing car associated with the double homicide of the mother and brother of Jennifer Hudson.
The vehicle belongs to Jason Hudson, the brother of Jennifer Hudson, who was found with a shot to the chest last Friday. The vehicle was found just 13 miles from the crime scene and just 2 miles from where William Balfour was located. A medical examiner confirmed that the body found inside the vehicle indeed was that of Julian King, Miss Hudson's 7 year old nephew. Miss Hudson offered a $100,000 reward to help locate Julian after he was reported missing last Friday.
William Balfour has had been questioned over the weekend and is currently back in prison due to parole violations.
Please see the related story update:
Police Confirm Body is Jennifer Hudson's Nephew
Crowd Power
-
ojt
Nashville, United States -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada
Recommendations (32)

Anonymous user












Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (24)
at 09:01 on October 27th, 2008
CNN previously reported the Chicago Tribune had identified the body as Julian King "citing the medical examiner's office". The report was posted in this space. That has changed and no such reference appears on the CNN or the Chicago Tribune websites. That story has been removed.
ABC now is stepping off the ledge.
Source: abcnews.go.com
at 06:09 on October 27th, 2008
Video of the scene where the SUV was discovered is also available at the site cited below.
Source: chicagobreakingnews.com
at 06:12 on October 27th, 2008
Thanks dunkelberg
at 06:53 on October 27th, 2008
If OJT his reporting new information from unique sources, I apologize in advance. If OJT thinks he/she is reporting what is known fact, he/she should add the would "may" to his/her headline. To report that the police "have" not "has" found the body is irresponsible journalism. That has not been confirmed as fact.
The Public will continue to find all posting on these "news" sites suspect thanks to such careless reporting. When you ASSUME you make an A** out of U and ME.
at 07:05 on October 27th, 2008
Thank you for your comments, your point is well taken. Although it is only speculation at this point that the body is that of Julian King, mainstream media is reporting it in a similar manner.
Source: eonline.com
at 07:39 on October 27th, 2008
"may' is the third word in this report. This clearly communicates that it is speculation at this point. OJT, in his headline, is reporting it as fact.
If this was your son. would you want someone to tell you he is dead before they KNEW for sure. These reports are not "similar" at all.
All of us don't want it to be the boy. Some of us are holding out hope and searching the internet for stories that will answer our prayers. For someone to dash those hopes in an attempt to be the "FIRST" to report such tragic news is beyond irresponsible journalism. It is just cruel.
at 08:31 on October 27th, 2008
You "may" have cancer. You go to be tested at a hospital. Many doctors agree that you show all the signs you "may" have the disease.
The lab tests have not come back, yet. However, one doctor who is going "off-shift" wants to be the FIRST tell you the bad news. Based on all the other doctors opinions and your symptoms he believes its a 99% chance you have the disease. He calls and tells you "I'm sorry it has been confirmed that you do indeed have cancer."
The tests come back that your tumor is benign. Would you
a) consider what the doctor told you as "similar" to what the other doctors were saying and just dismiss it lightly.
OR
b) demand an apology from the false reporting doctor and sue him to boot.
I think you would choose "b". Not only would you never trust another word out of that doctor's mouth, you would never return to that hospital ever again.
I certainly will never trust this writer or this website in the future. I will learn from my mistake.
at 07:04 on October 27th, 2008
ojt, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 07:05 on October 27th, 2008
ojt, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 07:21 on October 27th, 2008
The tags are the same it is the SUV and it is the child
at 08:36 on October 27th, 2008
You "may" have cancer. You go to be tested at a hospital. Many doctors agree that you show all the signs you "may" have the disease.
The lab tests have not come back, yet. However, one doctor who is going "off-shift" wants to be the FIRST tell you the bad news. Based on all the other doctors opinions and your symptoms he believes its a 99% chance you have the disease. He calls and tells you "I'm sorry it has been confirmed that you do indeed have cancer."
The tests come back that your tumor is benign. Would you
a) consider what the doctor told you as "similar" to what the other doctors were saying and just dismiss it lightly.
OR
b) demand an apology from the false reporting doctor and sue him to boot.
I think you would choose "b". Not only would you never trust another word out of that doctor's mouth, you would never return to that hospital ever again.
I certainly will never trust this writer or this website in the future. I will learn from my mistake.
at 08:49 on October 27th, 2008
Again, point well taken, however, given the other confirmed facts surrounding this sad discovery it may be a bit argumentative to make this sort of comparison.
Source: wacotrib.com
You are correct, it is still speculation. You are correct, that stating speculation as fact can do harm if the speculation is later proven false. At this point whether or not that speculation was wrong is still unknown.
To reach and say that a speculative headline on one story makes the entire of NowPublic unreliable is an equally serious misstatement of fact. ojt changed this headline as soon as asked to by editorial staff and has been very cooperative in his/her handling of this very emotional story.
at 07:25 on October 27th, 2008
ojt, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 07:28 on October 27th, 2008
Please see more NowPublic.com coverage of this tragic event:
Reports say child's body found in Hudson case
Jennifer Hudson Headlines
Jennifer Hudson, real-time comments and condolences from the web
at 07:32 on October 27th, 2008
Cable network news agencies, CNN and MSNBC, are reporting the identifty of the child found in the vehicle is unknown.
It is premature to state it is the missing nephew.
at 08:41 on October 27th, 2008
Agreed, which is why the story has been updated to more accurately state the facts. However, it has been confirmed that the body found fits the description of missing Julian King, it has been confirmed that the vehicle in which the body was found is the same vehicle that was noted in the Amber Alert about Julian, and it was found within blocks of the area where suspect William Balfour was arrested. Speculation, definitely, but given the other confirmed facts that speculation is (sadly) likely to be accurate.
ojt has edited the story as requested and has been very good about getting this news out to the community quickly.
at 09:04 on October 27th, 2008
Hudson family to hold noon hour vigil at Chicago's Pleasant Gift Baptist Church
Source: chicagotribune.com
at 10:09 on October 27th, 2008
Press conference expected soon, body of boy found in Jason Hudson's SUV at medical examiners office
Source: chicagobreakingnews.com
at 11:05 on October 27th, 2008
Boy's body, Jason Hudson's SUV, found by man walking dog
Source: chicagobreakingnews.com
Press Conference Scheduled this Afternoon
Source: chicagobreakingnews.com
at 12:23 on October 27th, 2008
ojt, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 12:30 on October 27th, 2008
so sad
at 12:48 on October 27th, 2008
ojt, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 13:34 on October 27th, 2008
Source: chicagobreakingnews.com