Bombing Campaign Against Iran 'Within Weeks'

by Wim Bartelds | August 29, 2008 at 02:46 am
739 views | 16 Recommendations | 11 comments

Photos

Bombing Campaign Against Iran 'Within Weeks'

Bombing Campaign Against Iran 'Within Weeks'

see larger image

uploaded by Wim Bartelds

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

THE HAGUE - A highly successful operation inside Iran's 'arms industry' by Dutch intelligence service AIVD, aimed at disruption and sabotage, has been halted and Dutch intelligence personnel has been withdrawn because of a planned attack by the US on Iran within weeks. Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf says AIVD's intelligence on Iran has been shared with the CIA in recent years.


The US intends to carry out an aerial bombing campaign against Iran within weeks, credible sources say. The campaign will be directed against crucial sections of Iran's nuclear facilities as well as against the country's military command and control structure. Analysts expect Iran to attempt to block the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation, although a very substantial US-led Western naval force is on its way to the Persian Gulf to prevent that.

 

Armada

Recently a naval blockading exercise by US, British and French naval forces, termed 'Operation Brimstone'  took place in the Atlantic, and the bulk of the forces that made up the exercise are on their way to the Gulf Region, to team up with other US naval forces. In the near future, the USS Theodore Roosevelt and its Carrier Strike Group Two, the USS Ronald Reagan  and its Carrier Strike Group Seven, the USS Abraham Lincoln and its Carrier Strike Group Nine, the USS Peleliu and its expeditionary strike group, the USS Iwo Jima and its expeditionary strike group, the British HMS Ark Royal carrier battle group, the French nuclear hunter-killer submarine Amethyste and French Naval Rafale fighter jets on-board the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and a host of guide missile frigates, cruisers and destroyers as well as support units, are expected to be in position near Iran.

 

Iran has repeatedly threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz in case it is attacked. An estimated one-third of the world's oil supplies are transported through the Strait of Hormuz.

 

Reliable sources say neither the US nor Israel will be able to take out Iran's nuclear program completely, given the number of Iranian facilities involved as well as their geographical spread, and in a number of cases their underground location: thus it would suffice to take out the program's 'critical nodes' in order to set back Iran's program significantly.

 

S-300 initial deployment

According to analysts, at least one of two strongly deterrent aspects of Iran's defences may have been sufficiently diminished for US decision-makers to go ahead: Israel has gathered a wealth of information about Iran's Russian-made S-300 air defence systems, which are considered to be the most powerful in the world. S-300 air defence systems can simultaneously track hundreds of semi-stealth cruise missiles, long range missiles and aircraft. 

 

From late May to early June, the Israeli Air Force carried out an exercise called ‘Glorious Spartan’ over Crete, in conjunction with the Greek Air Force. Greece, like Iran, has S-300 systems. Israel swarmed over a hundred of its fighter planes into Greece's S-300 radars, and is expected to have shared its analysis of the operational, tactical and strategic workings with the US. Greece’s S-300s are some ten years old, Iran’s are brand-new and thus even more advanced. Sources say Western intelligence services estimate that S-300 systems in Iran will be fully operational by year’s end, but that initial deployment has already begun.

A month after operation ‘Glorious Spartan’ the US navy extensively tested the communications network supporting its Aegis missile defence system across the Middle East.

 

Coastal defences

The second strongly deterrent aspect of Iran's weaponry consists of the country's coastal defences. Iran possesses a very large number of state-of-the-art Russian-made anti-ship-missiles that are estimated to have the ability to incapacitate or even sink aircraft carriers. It is unclear which tactics may be employed against these weapons, in case of an attack.

Military analysts speculate that an aerial campaign will first aim at taking out Iran’s coastal and aerial defences, followed by a very large number of sorties to destroy at least the ‘critical nodes’ in Iran’s nuclear program. Israel would not partake, as it would need a substantial part of its assets to guard its Syrian and Lebanese borders, given the tremendous upheaval that an attack on Iran would cause in the Middle East.



recommend This comment thread is now closed
Barry Artiste
Barry Artiste
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:57 on August 29th, 2008

Wim Bartelds, I like this story. It's good stuff. Hey a good read, thanks, I see you are having a problem with the highlighter and link, just contact one of the editors and they can help you with that,  Now Public Computer Guru Jordan, has offered the following advice: If this does not work, perhaps contact him.


It's the xml added by Word that causes the disappearances... To solve the problem is to strip all tags from pasted text, but then the contributor would lose any formatting or links that they've inserted. As you found, it's not entirely consistent, so it's hard to hit upon the winning formula. What I usually do is type directly into the story box, and occasionally Ctl-A and Ctl-C, so I have a clipboarded version of what I just wrote in case things go pear-shaped.


Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 05:03 on August 29th, 2008

Wim Bartelds, I like this story. It's good stuff.


I hope not though.  Well, Bush may stay in Power now.

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/g-w-bush-takes-mugabes-advice-and-will-suspend-constitution-declare-state-emergency-and-remain-power-opinion



0
davboz

Just what does it mean to "like this story", or that "this is a good story" ???

Is it that it is written well, regardless of content?

Is this story at all credible?

Is it just an extension of the writer's conviction that Bush-Cheney are committed to attacking Iran before leaving office whether any realities actually reflect that conviction?

Does it actually any basis in fact - above and beyond the impressive knowledge of each country's defenses and military components? Or is it just anti-Bush or even all-out anti-American propaganda?

Does the reader not deserve some insight into the answers to these questions before he is able to even consider whether this is a good article or not?

I find it INCREDIBLY hard to believe that this writer is privileged to these developments when no other agency or writer is submitting the tale? - aside from opinion-based raving lunatic blogs who spout a roughly similar accusation not infrequently, albeit without this writers account of ships and weapon systems


0
davboz

Just what does it mean to "like this story", or that "this is a good story" ???

Is it that it is written well, regardless of content?

Is this story at all credible?

Is it just an extension of the writer's conviction that Bush-Cheney are committed to attacking Iran before leaving office whether any realities actually reflect that conviction?

Does it actually have any basis in fact - above and beyond the impressive knowledge of each country's defenses and military components? Or is it just anti-Bush or even all-out anti-American propaganda?

Does the reader not deserve some insight into the answers to these questions before he is able to even consider whether this is a good article or not?

I find it INCREDIBLY hard to believe that this writer is privileged to these developments when no other agency or writer is submitting the tale? - aside from opinion-based raving lunatic blogs who spout a roughly similar accusation not infrequently, albeit without this writers account of ships and weapon systems


0
Spider130

Sounds like pure journalistic speculation to me. With the exception of official military journalists, all  other journalists especially TV ones, should be banned from every area of conflict world wide! Wars are started by religious fanatics and irresponsible journalists.

Heritage
Heritage
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:40 on August 29th, 2008

Wim Bartelds, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Frank Fortune

This adds just one more lie to the basket of lies Britain's PM Gordon Brown carries around with him: he  has been telling people he has been spending the summer working on an economic recovery plan to help people. BS: the dude is working on his plans for bombing Iran and WWIII.

0
Wim Bartelds

(I apologize for the rather late reaction to your interesting reactions)


Two types of sources underly my article: serious open source information, and informal contacts such as go with the territory of being a journalist.

Most of the information in my article is open source, and a much smaller part is based upon sources who must remain unnamed.


Therefore, regretfully, the remark that someone made that he finds it 'incredibly hard to believe that this writer is privileged to these developments when no other agency or writer is submitting the tale?" I do find somewhat offensive.

Kindly do not doubt my honesty as a journalist, and kindly do not shoot from the hip by implying that in my profession I'm biased. 



Of course there is a speculative aspect to my article. Nevertheless, everything factual in my text can be checked, and an implicit 'direction' which the text may make to some readers is significantly related to the sources mentioned above (there is relevance to their anonymity).



I'm neither advocating for nor protesting against an attack on Iran. I'm simply describing a rapidly rising probability.


Wim


0
Heritage

Hi Wim,

Thanks for posting! Keep it up.

Heritage

0
Lungfish

I wouldn't argue with your analysis of  Iran's defenses and the probable plan of attack. I've always appreciated your inclusion of such details since I'm usually distracted by the abstracts and politics and less focused on the operational realities. As to whether the attack will happen, I think the U.S. has had aggressive posturing in the past that caused such speculation, and I'm more inclined to believe this is being done just to "keep the pressure on." Not to compare you to Pravda (you're way more trustworthy) but they've predicted an attack in April 3 years in a row!

Another possibility is that the U.S. is trying to goad Iran into erratic behavior, to scare them into a preemptive attack that would give political motivation for a war. Without an attack that can be credibly tied to Iran, a third war in the Middle East would be disasterous for Bush, the McCain campaign, and Republicans.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from