Bringing Life From Mars

by Yuliya Talmazan | July 14, 2008 at 11:07 am
186 views | 5 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

A distant world perhaps.. or maybe it's Mars...

A distant world perhaps.. or maybe it's Mars...

see larger image

uploaded by TheChimpofdoom

By the time 2023 rolls around, the era of speculations as to whether life exists on Mars will be coming to its end. An international space mission, which will send space probes with an intention of bringing samples of Martian rock back to Earth, should answer all the questions. The scientists will than inspect the rock sample for any traces of life. It has always been a one-way trip as never before has any lander taken off Mars and brought a sample of planetary rock back to Earth for analysis. The mission will cost a whopping $8 billion and will be sponsored by numerous national space agencies with NASA and European Space Agency leading the way. But, is spending that much money worth bringing half a kilogram of Martian dust back to Earth? As it turns out, if we are ever to send a manned mission to Mars, spending the equivalent of the GDP of Afghanistan or Armenia on a space probe may be very worthwhile.

"If you can't bring a rock back you are not going to be able to bring people back. There's a real feeling that bringing samples back from Mars is absolutely essential if we are going to continue our Martian exploration programme."

The mission would involve the launch of two separate craft from Earth - a "lander composite" and an "orbiter composite". Both would make the trip to Mars, where the lander would touch down on the surface. It would then release a rover which would collect a variety of rock samples totalling around half a kilogram.

It would bring these back to the lander, where the rocks, plus a sample of Martian atmosphere, would be encased in a sealed pod within the so-called Mars Ascent Vehicle - part of the lander composite. This would then blast off from the surface and dock with the orbiter before transferring its precious cargo. The orbiter would then return to Earth, enter the atmosphere and land. At this point, scientists would rush in and transfer the samples to a top-level biosecurity lab, where they would be analysed for any possible signs of life.

The possibility of sending of a two-way mission to Mars may largely depend on politicians and their backing of the project in both Europe and the US. The space ambitions of the incoming US President may play a deciding role. Currently, both US presidential candidates, Barack Obama and John McCain, support the idea of Martian exploration and manned missions.

However, the financial backing is not the only challenge that the new mission faces. Microbial contamination is also of a considerable concern.

"There's a big caveat when you start playing with Mars, and that's planetary protection. You have to be very careful not to bring anything back that might be harmful to Earth," he said. "Your mission has to be guaranteed, and I really mean guaranteed, to get into the Earth's atmosphere without damaging itself."

If Martian microbes do exist they must be extremely hardy, having survived the planet's freezing, desiccating surface and bombardment with UV radiation, so if the returning spacecraft blew up on re-entry scientists could not be sure that Martian life forms on board would be destroyed in the blast. It would also be impossible to know what they would do to life on Earth.



Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
mchawk
mchawk
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:07 on July 14th, 2008

yuls.source, I like this story. It's good stuff.

It'll be interesting to see just how much weight the next President gives to space exploration.  It'll be hard to justify federal spending on continued missions to Mars when the economy is falling apart at the seams.

But, as Kennedy said: "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard."

Quite right.

0
MarsAtlantian007

Who speaks for Mars? There are Plenty of 3diminsional carvings of faces and animals as well as scenes carved out of the planetary rock describing some record of events. There's alot of Visual items in all my flickr pages that can not be completely natural geology, all of the image crops I have of the Henry Crater area of Mars to me points to an intelligence, of creatures or civilizations that at one time created these land forms and art drawings. They say that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. and all these image crops just add to the pile of evidence by independent investigators like myself, that when looked at as a whole point to a different conclusion and history of the red planet than others will have us believe. What is this face looking at? and why is it there? & Who will speak for Mars!

MarsAtlantian007 has contributed a photo to this story.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

mchawk
First Flagged at 12:07 PM, Jul 14, 2008 by mchawk
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from