Brown breaks neutrality pact in US election and praises Obama

by Dave Keating | September 9, 2008 at 11:10 pm
264 views | 21 Recommendations | 8 comments

Videos

Barack Obama In London

see larger video

sourced by Dave Keating

Barack Obama In London

Gordon Brown has gotten into some trouble in the UK for seeming to endorse Barack Obama. In a magazine article, the British prime minister heaped praise on Obama but did not mention McCain. Traditionally, heads of state are not supposed to get involved in other country's elections. Downing Street denies that Brown was endorsing Obama with his comments. In reaction, the McCain campaign has filed a complaint wth the British embassy in washington and launched an attack on Brown on its web site mocking the endorsement.

Gordon Brown broke with political convention yesterday by offering effusive praise for Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, at a time when foreign leaders are meant to maintain a careful neutrality ahead of the US election.

The prime minister claimed Mr Obama and his party were the ones offering Americans the best solutions to their economic woes.

Mr Brown claimed in an article for Parliamentary Monitor, a Westminster publication, "progressive" politicians like him - and counterparts in the US, Australia and New Zealand - had the best answers for the downturn.

"In the electrifying US presidential campaign, it is the Democrats who are generating ideas to help people through more difficult times," he wrote. "To help prevent people from losing their home, Barack Obama has proposed a Foreclosure Prevention Fund to increase emergency pre-foreclosure counselling, and help families facing repossession."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Dave Keating

Yeah I can't decide if I think he did it on purpose or not. It seems so bungling that I'm inclined to think he didn't, and he was just not thinking. But who knows.

Emilio Lizardo
Emilio Lizardo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:28 on September 10th, 2008

'Traditionally, heads of state are not supposed to get involved in other country's elections. '

Right ... the multi-nationals wouldn't like that at all, would they ?

0
smedley jones

they've given their country over to the muslims -and now hope the same for us, the English empire has fallen, long live Barry HUSSIAN Osama

Karen Hatter
Karen Hatter
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:34 on September 10th, 2008

Dave Keating, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:35 on September 10th, 2008

Dave Keating, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Scott Lunt

'Traditionally, heads of state are not supposed to get involved in other country's elections.'

Yet the U.S. is constantly involved in elections in other countries.

0
joellerose

Maybe Brown does know what he is doing since this is probably worth a half million votes for McCain-Palin.

HJP
HJP
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:45 on September 10th, 2008

Dave Keating, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from