NP Rank:
BU Professor says 'end-time passions' find fertile soil in US
End-time passions find fertile soil in the United States according to Alexander Riley, a sociology professor at Bucknell University who has incorporated the study of the 'end-times', known as Eschatology, into his courses.
In a CNN Entertainment report, showcasing Hollywood films depicting threats to the human race, Professor Riley observes that end-time passions find particularly fertile soil in the United States.
"It's been a constant part of the landscape in the Western world for a long time," he says, though it's been particularly present in recent times, perhaps driven by ever-quickening social and technological change, he adds.
Riley observes that end-times passions find particularly fertile soil in the United States, which has a higher degree of religiosity compared to other developed nations, according to a 2008 Gallup survey. At the evangelical Friends Church in Yorba Linda, California -- one of the largest Quaker churches in the world -- Phil Hotsenpiller, the church's teaching pastor, gives a yearly series of lectures on end-times concepts and says interest has been high, with "lines out the door."
He says that he tries to educate his audience about the sources of apocalyptic thought, and why biblical prophecy is such a draw for some.
"Biblical prophecy lays out a scenario that God says this is what's going to happen, and just watch for these signs," he says.
But it's not just Christian groups that have an end-times fascination. Riley says that all the major monotheistic faiths -- Judaism, Christianity and Islam -- have variations on the belief that God interacts directly with humanity, and has made a promise "to wrap things up, and then we'll get on with Act Two."
Author Anthony Campbell also takes a look at why religion has such a strong hold on human societies. Campbell believes that one reason why religions have such a strong hold on human societies is that they are based on story-telling, or narratives.
One reason why religions have such a strong hold on human societies is that they are based not primarily on intellectual beliefs but on narratives. Story-telling accesses the human psyche not at the intellectual but at the emotional level, where it is more powerful; probably the brain pathways are different for narrative response and belief formation. Human beings are story-telling by nature. Every society seems to have had its story-tellers, its oral epic poets, and the earliest literature that has come down to us (the Iliad, the Odyssey, the Gilgamesh epic) is narrative. Today we still enjoy narratives in the form of plays, films, and novels. (The death of the novel, like the death of religion, is constantly being foretold yet both novels and religions seemingly continue to thrive.)
Intellectual critics today tend to assume that all this narrative material is merely a concession to the limited understanding of the uneducated masses, who are unfitted to understand the sophisticated concepts that are the real substance of religion. I think that this puts things the wrong way round. To understand the appeal of religions we should look first at the narratives in which they are expressed and only subsequently at the doctrinal beliefs that they give rise to.
If this idea is right, it follows that the occurrence of strange beliefs in religion has a ready explanation. Many people find it difficult to distinguish between fact and fiction. Writers of radio or television soap operators often report that people write to the fictional characters in the apparent belief that they are real. This is a trivial illustration of a basic human propensity, which is to project the stories we tell ourselves on the outer world. The human imagination has given rise to religious stories in which all kinds of miraculous and wonderful events occur. These are taken to be real, and give rise to beliefs which are then incorporated into the religions as factual statements.
Recommended reading: HOW DID RELIGION originate?
Related stories on NowPublic Religion Special News Coverage
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Recommendations (26)
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (15)
at 11:14 on November 17th, 2009
Great post!!!
at 11:22 on November 17th, 2009
Thanks, smk!:)
at 12:14 on November 17th, 2009
"Many scientists cannot distinguish between truth and fiction as well."
If it is true that "Many people find it difficult to distinguish between fact and fiction."
Then the statement could include scientists, economists, etc. Nonetheless:
Source: mahidol.ac.th
at 12:28 on November 17th, 2009
Nice comment, Rhonda.
I do find it interesting that scientists do the same thing - even with all their knowledge. By do the same thing, i mean fill in the spots they can't explain, only they call them "theories", which are then taught as truth.
at 14:27 on November 17th, 2009
Science is a better judge of truth than fiction. It evolves as we learn more from the process of evolution. Religion, on the other hand, is based on faith, and faith alone. No theory, or scientific experimentation to prove or disprove the "theory." It is perfectly acceptable for people to have a belief system based on faith. You just can't call it science.
at 14:01 on November 17th, 2009
Thanks, Hugh!
at 17:50 on November 17th, 2009
I can't watch movies about the end of the world, I don't like them
at 18:48 on November 17th, 2009
Good post Rhonda:)
at 18:56 on November 17th, 2009
Thanks, ACP:) I find the fascination with 'end-time passions' very interesting. Even more, the origins of religion and it's strong hold on human societies. In other words, never questioning:).
at 19:03 on November 17th, 2009
Religions were set up to be followed in blind faith. It really wasn't until Martin Luther translated the bible from Latin to German that some of the practices of the Church were questioned.
I find it somewhat amazing that even today in North America that some still follow some cult like religions with blind faith.
at 19:30 on November 17th, 2009
"I find it somewhat amazing that even today in North America that some still follow some cult like religions with blind faith."
I find it amazing that most North Americans follow any religion with blind faith. Worse yet,
'Cult' program in NYC Schools, funded by Department of Education for the past 3 years, unbelievable. Due to the attention it has now received, the program is being put aside until the investigation is complete -- I can't wait for the results.
at 19:50 on November 17th, 2009
While some follow religion in blind faith, others pretend they are following. It.s the thing to do, put yourself in good light on Sunday morning, drop your guilt and carry on doing what you did before. Oops did I say that?
at 19:59 on November 17th, 2009
Yes you did say that:)! Unfortunately, I find it true.
at 18:49 on November 17th, 2009
No worries -- it is only a state of mind:)! Thank you for reading, commenting, and for the recommendation, Amy!
at 07:20 on November 18th, 2009
Here is the truth and it has nothing to do with religion; while science impacts the truth and helps interpret it, it is less relevant to this human observation.
When nations of the world arm themselves with nuclear weapons, any several of which individual weapons exploding in environmentally sensitive areas, or targets as it were, the end is right around the corner from illogical and fanatic rulers who cannot resist hitting the launch button.
Apocaplypse is fast becoming a real prospect: Iran, India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea, Russia, and the USA -- while the leadership vary in personality as do their forms of government, events may very well eclipse sanity.
YJ