Budget Amendment: Very Likely Contrary to the U.S. Constitution

by Karen Hatter | July 17, 2011 at 11:53 am
139 views | 4 Recommendations | 4 comments

Videos

U.S. Stocks Lose Ground Amid Debt-Limit Deal Concerns

see larger video

sourced by Karen Hatter

U.S. Stocks Lose Ground Amid Debt-Limit Deal Concerns

Photos

Rep. Cantor Discusses House Member Security In Light Of Recent Th

Rep. Cantor Discusses House Member Security In Light Of Recent Th

see larger image

uploaded by Getty Images

Before getting down to serious business to craft some form of solution to the looming debt ceiling deadline of August 2, a number of bills will be brought to the floor for symbolic votes in the Republican Party controlled House of Representatives. None of the bills are expected to pass. 

It is alleged that these actions are being offered as political cover for any possible deal that may eventually be cut with President Obama as well as an effort to somehow placate the various TEA Party freshmen in the House that are stuck in neutral, entrenched in their positions, being led by Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, it has been opined, against the efforts of Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner.

One idea and bill that has been crafted is a balanced budget amendment bill, an idea that has been trumpeted by conservatives and the Right Wing of the GOP, the TEA Party.

However, this approach may not be exactly constitutional, which in the past, has been the litmus test for those claiming TEA Party affinity, stating their desire to uphold the U.S. Constitution.       

.... Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution vests in Congress — even before the commerce power — are “[t]o lay and collect Taxes . . . to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States” and “[t]o borrow money on the credit of the United States.” 

Regarding attempts to change the Constitution with a balanced budget amendment, ....

.... critics say the amendment is little more than political posturing that impresses voters but still leaves lawmakers facing painful decisions about which programs to cut or taxes to increase.

“Politicians use them to sound like they’re doing something substantial on the deficit when in fact they’re not,” said Robert Bixby ....

Mr. Bixby is the executive director of a nonpartisan balanced budget advocacy group called Concord Coalition.   

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
john doe freedom

the constitution have the solution, and probably all the world should follow this section. the days of paper are gone. bit.ly/qyl7H2

1
YankeeJim

We don't have Senator Byrd to read the Constitution to us any more.

2
Karen Hatter

Well, Jim, after taking control of the House, taking their seats in January 2011, the Republicans did lead an abridged, amended reading of the U.S. Constitution, lest the American people become confused upon hearing what was contained in the original, historical document.


Members of the House of Representatives, led by their new Republican majority, will kick off the 112th Congress this morning with a reading of the U.S. Constitution. The reading is largely a political maneuver, so it's no real surprise that the Constitution you'll hear read on C-SPAN this morning will be the politically correct version.

It's fairly likely that no elected politician wants to stand up and read aloud the Founder's vision of African Americans as equaling three-fifths of a white person, so the GOP has decided to leave that part, and others, out when the Constitution is read today.

It was reported nine sections of the Constitution were not read.  

The Constitution contains nine parts that were later changed — including an entire amendment, the 18th, which banned the manufacturing and sale of alcohol — which will be left out of Thursday’s reading. The omitted sections, which do not apply to the 112th Congress, include the so-called “three-fifths clause,” the election of senators by state legislatures and the original process outlined for electing the vice president.

The abridged reading in January seemed a kind of Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin approach to U.S. history; leaving out the parts you don't like or don't know. 

That leaves plenty of room for making stuff up! Any resultant historical confusion can be written off as plausible deniability.

And, as a last resort, volunteer or solicited 'aides' can 'correct' Wikipedia.  


1
ishambat

Balanced Budget Amendment is a gimmick.

Actually balancing the budget is the real task, and something that was only done by Clinton in the last several decades.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

YankeeJim
First Flagged at 12:05 PM, Jul 17, 2011 by YankeeJim
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (4)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from