Bush and Cheney are gone in six months. Secure the evidence - NOW!

Bush and Cheney are gone in six months. Secure the evidence - NOW!

Bush Administration | Dick Cheney | George W. Bush

by Stephen Pizzo | August 12, 2008 - 10:47am

article tools: email | print | read more Stephen Pizzo

The Bush administration's days are numbered. That's both a good and bad news story.

The good news is we are now less than six months away from the end of America's longest nightmare.

The bad news is we have less than six months for congress and the courts to insure that, when these guys leave Washington on Jan 21, 2009, they leave behind an accurate and complete historical record.

George W. Bush, unpopular now in the extreme, comforts himself with the oft repeated hope that "history will vindicate our policies."

Well, history can only vindicate -- or condemn -- if it has a complete historical record to work from. And as the days tick down to the end of this administration's reign, it has become increasingly obvious that there's a lot they have not wanted us to know, have not allowed us to know and are highly unlikely to let us know -- unless the evidence is secured before it can be hidden behind the walls of a yet-to-be built Bush Library, spirited away by individual administration officials or -- most likely -- simply deleted or shredded. (I know because I've been here before.)

I'm not going to waste the reader's time listing all the high crimes and misdemeanors this bunch is now suspected of having committed over it's eight years in power. (Here's an excellent list.) Suffice it to say that they have made the Nixon administrations look like choir boys and girls by comparison. But at least in case of the Nixon gang, Congress and the Supreme Court secured the relevant evidence, including the all-revealing Oval Office tapes.

And believe me, the Bushies noticed what happens when the evidence of crimes is left laying around rather than destroyed. Nixon later said his greatest regret was not destroying those tapes when he had the chance.

Who knows ... maybe all us finger-pointers and accusers have been wrong all along. Maybe the Bush folk actually didn't break laws at all. Who knows... anything is possible. And, if that can be proven, I will be the first one to admit I was wrong.

But before I -- or history -- can reach such a conclusion, we need a complete historical record.

Unfortunately this Democratic-controlled congress is so steeped in political game-playing aimed at November elections, they are not about to engage in anything that even approaches fulfilling their constitutional obligations, vis a vie impeachment or real hearings.

But one thing Congress could and should do, and do immediately, is compile a detailed list of every document the administration has refused to turn over on the grounds of executive privilege. Then issue individual subpoenas for each document as well as blanket subpoenas for all documents "disclosed and undisclosed," covering specific areas of investigation; the war, the politicization of Dept. of Justice, energy policy meetings, Katrina response, etc.

Of course, if we've learned anything over the past couple of years it's that we cannot depend on the Democrats in Congress to show much backbone. Which is why the courts need to get involved, and fast. Public interest legal groups, on both the right and left, have an obligation to their own principles and to history to turn their full attentions to preserving the complete documentary history of this administration.

Groups usually on the opposite sides of issues, should join forces on this one. They should get to federal court and make the case that this administration's public record of either refusing to turn over documents, and refusing to testify under oath and of even destroying electronic documents (such as five million White House emails) establishes a prima facia case in favor of a court injunction against the destruction or removal from government offices of the following records be they physical or virtual: