Calgary: Council's Weary Hamlet Act With Plan-It Vote

by Patrick Hanlon | June 22, 2009 at 12:45 pm
127 views | 2 Recommendations | 5 comments

Despite being cited by urbanists near and far as how not to plan a city, or what happens when a city is not planned properly, there is still a great deal of uncertainty about whether or not the council will approve Plan-It, which calls for actions to be made to create greater mixed use throughout the city and reducing the development of sprawl, which has been Calgary's primary response to the population growth which has taken place over the last 20 years.

The most vocal opposition to the program has come from developers, who argue that the plan to reduce sprawl will drive up real estate prices by restricting the supply of land.  Such an argument overlooks the underused land that is available for redevelopment and development in the downtown area.  Another matter that the developers are likely overlooking is that new suburban developments on the edge of the city may reduce the quality of life and the property values of the older suburbs. 

For instance, Dalhousie and Hawkwood, suburban developments in the Northwest Calgary, have not aged well for a variety of reasons.  Most self-evident is that suburbs are built to be on the edge of the city.  With further development beyond these areas, the increased traffic that passes through or near these areas via Country Hills Boulevard, Crowchild Trail and Shaganappi Trail, have made commutes more difficult and placed stresses on the limited retail, recreational and social resources in the area.  Building more suburbs beyond this area and beyond the more recent suburbs of Tuscany, Rocky Ridge and Royal Oak, will put more stress on city coffers by demanding new infrastructure to be built further and further away.  Layering suburbs in this manner will likely induce a fall in property values as the quality of the community declines while the city favours developing newer, sexier infrastructure projects further afield.

There is great potential for the city's business district and a need to bring about greater mixed use in the downtown core.  Everyone in Calgary knows how the area empties quickly after the work day is done.  There remain, however, two spines of activity that frame the downtown area.  The Bow River Trail that runs north of the area is often busy with pedestrian commuters and recreational activity.  Joggers, cyclists, and others crowd both sides of the river and bring activity to the cultural active, natural area of Prince's Park Island.  Stephen Avenue, continues to sustain a reasonable level of pedestrian traffic outside of business hours, but there is still potential to expand on the traffic that on that street from Olympic Plaza west to 4th Avenue West.

The challenge is to expand beyond those two pockets of off-hours activity.  Apart from Barclay Walk, which connects 8th Avenue to Eau Claire Market, the YMCA and Prince's Park, there is little to invite people to cross the abyss between Stephen Avenue and the Bow River.  There is abundant parking, which could and ought to be developed to provide uses other than office space.  More recreational and residential use of this area will revitalize the area and make it into a true downtown area.

The opportunities in the downtown area and the problems that will be exacerbated by continuing to expand the city's footprint with further suburbanization will not contribute to the development of a sustainable or united city.  At a time when municipal tax rates are rising and the cost of gasoline has breached $1 a litre for a second summer in a row, Plan-It offers an opportunity to lay the groundwork for the city to progress in the years ahead.  If the plan is rejected by City Hall on June 23rd, the only thing that will be sustained is the illusion that Calgary is wealthy enough to fend off the economic and ecological changes that it must acknowledge and adapt to.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
albertacowpoke

Interesting article Patrick.  A lot of cities are struggling with this.  The easy solution for most municipal politicians seems to be the expansion of the footprint.  Of course each time that happens, it not only requires more infrastructure, but it also uses up valuable farmland.

As Alberta grows, the amount of available farmland will continue to decline.  Let.s hope that the Calgary City Council does the right thing. 

Our city planners must start planning for the integration of industry, recreation and shopping in any new developments to assure in the future we don.t rely on vehicles to go to work.

0
Adam C. Sieracki

The underlying problem that isn't being addressed here is continued population growth--something that's neither inevitable, nor desirable. The bulk of this comes from our staggering immigration volumes: over a QUARTER MILLION people a year (actually, closer to 400,000, when illegal and 'temporary' immigration is included). All of those people WILL need more land, regardless of how dense and New Urbanist new developments are. This means a continual loss of farmland and natural greenspace, in addition to overtaxing our freshwater supply and increasing CO2 output. (People who move from warm climates to Canada need to keep warm by burning fossil fuels.)

Contrary to what the demographic pundits say, the only beneficiaries of mass immigration-fuelled growth are developers and the construction industry, and the banking sector. These industries need a constant influx of warm bodies to justify construction and issue mortgages. The mainstream environmental movement has completely sold out over this issue. The David Suzuki foundation recieves funding from BMO and RBC, both of whom advocate nearly doubling immigration. The Sierra Club imfamously got nearly $100M in donations from David Gelbaum, under the condition that it NOT discuss immigration or overpopulation. Then, there is the matter of political correctness. People are afraid of being labelled 'racist' for opposing our unsustainable tsunami of immigration, since most of the newcomers are 'people of colour'.

Unless we reign in our insane immigration volumes, the battle against urban sprawl is lost.

0
Patrick Hanlon

One point against the too-many-immigrants argument.  Many of these immigrants come from areas with denser populations than Calgary and would be willing to live in mixed-use high density communities, since many of them already do.  If they have the means to live in the suburbs there is admittedly nothing to stop them.

The sprawl in Calgary is generated by people who have the wealth and the desire to establish their own private domains and spend less rather than more time in the public domain.  The stresses placed on our resources that have been delineated are more a consequence of that quest for private space and a desire to close oneself off the contact and conflict that occurs from sharing public space. 

Finally before calling for stricter controls on immigration consider the fact that immigrants are increasingly saddled with the jobs that many would consider themselves too good to do.

0
Adam C. Sieracki

To reiterate: regardless of how dense new developments are (and how much 'brown' land is reused), we are going to have to sacrifice farm and natural land for development, if current immigration volumes continue. Have a look at, say, Country Hills, to see how DENSE some of these new developments are (mostly condos and homes with a couple of feet of lawn around them), sitting on what was farmland. Dense populations still use water and generate waste, and require food. There is no running away from the fact that more people means more stress on the local environment. What CAN stop them from moving to new suburban areas is not allowing them in the country--something which we DO have the power to do, as a sovereign nation with control over our borders.

'The desire for private space' is certainly a cause of sprawl. However, the city WILL continue to gobble up land as the population grows. Densification only slows the problem that a moratorium on mass immigration would prevent in the first place. When Planit proposed limiting ghettoiized developments, groups such as the Chinese community had a conniption. Thanks to multiculturalism, newcomers have no interest in participating in the CANADIAN community. Increasingly, certain ethnic groups are viewing conforming to Canadian cultural norms and even basic language fluency as optional. Thanks to our changing demographics, we now have probems like doda trafficing in the city that we used to be happilly ignorant of. The fact that Calgary's two ultraviolent rival gangs go buy names like Fresh Off the Boat and FOB-Killers really hammers home the point that sprawl isn't the only immigration-induced urban ill.

The 'immigrants do the work that we won't' argument is bogus. Many of our immigrants have come here on the Immigrant Entrepreneur programme, with its $400k+ admission fee. Additionally, family reunifications bring thousands of elderly and other non-working immigrants to Canada. Unemployment has been increasing. Governments at all levels have continued and expanded labour-gobbling makework programmes (the city cat registry comes to mind). One other, legitimate issue is that most of the whining about 'jobs Canadians won't do' comes from employers who would like to have a coercable, cheap, un-unionizable workforce.

You can't keep rehashing politically correct myths and burying your head in the multiculti diversity dust, if you want to conserve our land and water resources.

0
Patrick Hanlon

Your points Adam are only partially relevant to the issues the City Council is addressing in Calgary.  Immigration policy is a federal jurisdiction and there is little a municipal government can do to influence the federal government's policy.  That said, the city does anticipate a certain level of population growth and immigration and is trying to adjust to it.  If the city did nothing at all and maintained a laissez-faire attitude regarding planning the problems with space, water and resource management would become even worse than you anticipate. 

At this point, I would encourage you to write your own piece outlining your position on the impact of immigration.


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

albertacowpoke
First Flagged at 1:28 PM, Jun 22, 2009 by albertacowpoke

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from