California Must Cut Inmate Population

by Annina Bergman | August 4, 2009 at 03:47 pm
233 views | 14 Recommendations | 4 comments

California needs to cut its inmate population from the current 150,000 to about 100,000 in two years, by order of a panel of federal judges. The judges found that the prisons currently are grossly overpopulated, which leads to at least one unnecessary inmate death every week. They are calling for a change in the prison health care system, and accuse the prison system with lacking sufficient means to safely house the number of current prisoners. According to the court, the California prisons are currently at 200 percent capacity.

“In these overcrowded conditions, inmate-on-inmate violence is almost impossible to prevent, infectious diseases spread more easily, and lockdowns are sometimes the only means by which to maintain control,” the three judges wrote. “In short, California’s prisons are bursting at the seams and are impossible to manage.”

California has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on upgrading its prisons over the past couple of years, but the judges still ruled that the state is in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects prisoners from cruel and unusual punishment. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and other state officials are going to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, if the verdict stands.

The ruling, a result of three class action lawsuits addressing health issues in the prison system, is so far tentative, and will only be implemented if no other action is taken to improve the situation of the inmates. Those released would be prisoners who are considered of low risk to society, inmates who are serving time for parole violations, as well as those who are able to qualify for early release after partaking in rehabilitation programs.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Barry ORegan

Well if they upped it to 1001 unnecessary deaths every week, then there would be no over population in the prisons, certainly criminals may think twice committing a crime if they thought their survival rate in prison was greatly reduced.  What alternative are they proposing? Releasing them into the Public to kill, rape, rob again?  Vangroovy does that and look where we are today, with some criminals out of the streets with 128 convictions and no jail time. Sorry to be a fly in the ointment, but I don't feel sorry for any of them, They made their bed, now they can die in it.


One judges perception of Low Risk Offender or small time petty thief versus a murderer, may be different in the mind of the public when they are faced pmce again with a criminal in their home late at night.

0
Beaulieu

Reducing them, they should be increasing them.

0
Beaulieu

They just don't want to spend more money on increasing them. 

0
Beaulieu

It can't be good for tourists too who may get robbed  and raped because the Government wants to release them early. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 6:25 PM, Aug 4, 2009 by Rhonda J Mangus

Related Stories

Recommendations (14)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from