Can Obama win back the trust of progressives?

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | August 21, 2009 at 08:52 am
155 views | 22 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

Loading photos...
A spirit of bipartinsanship and unity must not take precedence in an hour of dire need,  and one which calls for determined response. 

Things have not been looking too good for President Obama these last few days,  on the Democratic and Progressive side of the line.  Undermined trust from progressives is the last thing he needs.  It can be won back,  but to do so,  he must acknowledge the depths of the surprise and disappointment among progressives who voted for Change,  and expected it. 

From New York Times Op-Ed columnist David Brooks on Thursday,  08/20/09:


. . .  there’s a growing sense among progressives that they have, as my colleague Frank Rich suggests, been punked. And that’s why the mixed signals on the public option created such an uproar.

Now, politics is the art of the possible. Mr. Obama was never going to get everything his supporters wanted.

But there’s a point at which realism shades over into weakness, and progressives increasingly feel that the administration is on the wrong side of that line. It seems as if there is nothing Republicans can do that will draw an administration rebuke: Senator Charles E. Grassley feeds the death panel smear, warning that reform will “pull the plug on grandma,” and two days later the White House declares that it’s still committed to working with him.

It’s hard to avoid the sense that Mr. Obama has wasted months trying to appease people who can’t be appeased, and who take every concession as a sign that he can be rolled.

Indeed, no sooner were there reports that the administration might accept co-ops as an alternative to the public option than G.O.P. leaders announced that co-ops, too, were unacceptable.

So progressives are now in revolt. Mr. Obama took their trust for granted, and in the process lost it. And now he needs to win it back.

Indeed he does,  and this can best be done by admitting that bi-partinsanship cannot be strictly adhered to,  cannot and must not be followed by rote,  when it is made clear that daily there are those in the GOP who view Obama's committment to unity as a sign of weakness.  Sometimes it is OK to be the opposer,  to chuck unity for what one knows is needed in a dire hour.  It is noble to be flexible,  but when needs are pressing,  it can veer into wishy-washiness.  And that is not an aspect which Barack Obama wears well,  nor one that he can afford to have become part of his public profile. 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
bettermaker

Not surprising, at all.  Obama was so hyped-up, I knew he wouldn't be able to satisfy the hype.  He still has some years left, so I'll give him a chance.  I still doubt that he'll be able to fix America by 2012.

1
Susan Marie Kovalinsky

He has his work cut out for him,  but I think the bipartisan stance is being used against him,  as a weakness.  

2
A. Tran

To some extent, President Obama had wasted a bit of his capital by trying to work with the Republicans, but knowledgeable progressives will still give him some latitude, I think.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

a211423
First Flagged at 9:40 AM, Aug 21, 2009 by a211423

Related Stories

Recommendations (22)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from