Can Stevens Win Reelection Despite Being Convicted of Falsifying Statements?

by Can Tran | October 28, 2008 at 12:42 pm
110 views | 17 Recommendations | 8 comments

Photos

Can Stevens Win Reelection Despite Being Convicted of Falsifying Statements?

Can Stevens Win Reelection Despite Being Convicted of Falsifying Statements?

see larger image

uploaded by Rhonda J Mangus

Yesterday, Republican Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska was charged with corruption. It was on Monday when the verdict was read to Stevens. Stevens was charged with falsifying statements in regards to receiving gifts worth thousands of dollars. These are very serious charges against Stevens.

There is a scheduled hearing on February 25, 2009. Under these charges, Stevens could serve a maximum sentence or up to thirty-five years. Regardless of what has happened, Stevens is still running for reelection. He’s called forth to voters to support him in his reelection campaign.

Two questions should be asked.

The first question is: How will this affect the dynamic of the contest between Stevens and Democratic rival, Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich?

The second question is: Can Stevens win and retain his seat?

So far it was revealed that before the conviction, Stevens and Begich were in dead heat with each other. Still, it shows that Stevens retains a strong chance of winning reelection. In short, this is a very interesting predicament.

Looking for major gains in Congress, it is obvious that the Democratic Party let alone Alaska Democratic Party will have its attention towards the state. So far, there is the probability of a major loss in Congress on the part of the GOP. The verdict would be good ammunition for the Democrats to use against Stevens.

Still, it is unknown if and how this will change the dynamic.

Regardless of the verdict, it seems that Stevens still retains power and influence. According to Don Mitchell, an attorney who was part of the Alaska Federation of Natives, Stevens has strong support from the native Alaskans.

However, there is possibly a new factor in play. Early this morning, GOP Presidential nominee Senator John McCain of Arizona had told Stevens to step down.

It is a sign of the health of our democracy that the people continue to hold their representatives to account for improper or illegal conduct, but this verdict is also a sign of the corruption and insider-dealing that has become so pervasive in our nation’s capital,” McCain said.

For that, McCain said that Stevens has broken his trust and needs to step down from his post.

But, there is the possibility that this could cause some tensions within the McCain campaign. McCain VP running mate Alaska Governor Sarah Palin said that it was a sad day for Alaska and for the Stevens family. According to an article on TIME.com, Palin has called on politicians to step down from their positions. However, the article explains that this was not the case in regards to Stevens’ conviction.

While McCain has called for Stevens to step down, Palin has not.

It is obvious that McCain will not be giving Stevens his support. Still, Stevens and Begich are in dead heat. There is still the high chance that Stevens could win regardless of the conviction against him.

It all rounds down to this: Despite the conviction received, can Stevens still win reelection?

We will find out Election Day on November 4. Those that want to know the answer should keep track of the Alaska elections then.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
Amy Judd
Amy Judd
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:53 on October 28th, 2008

Can Tran, I think an important question should be - should he be allowed to run again? I don't think he should be if he has a trial coming up.

0
Can Tran

Regardless of the trial, Senate rules say that Stevens doesn't have to resign his seat.

Fairbanks
Fairbanks
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:06 on October 28th, 2008

Who knows if Stevens will win?  He might, since he is still in the race. 

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:14 on October 28th, 2008

Can Tran, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Can Tran

And this just in, Palin's now calling forth for Stevens to resign.

0
Fairbanks

Is that something new since she said "then he needs to step aside" ? 

now calling forth for Stevens to resign
0
Can Tran

I noticed an updated article on CNN and a Political Ticker entry.  Earlier today, McCain said that Stevens needed to resign.  But, Palin didn't yet.  She did say that it was a sad day in Alaska and for the Stevens family.  Now, she too is calling forth for Stevens to leave office.

0
Fairbanks

Journalistic interpretation has often differed from what she has said.  Per

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/palin-calls-for.html

this is what she said:

Palin Calls for Stevens to Step Down

October 28, 2008 12:37 PM

In an interview recorded this morning for CNBC, set to air at closing bell of the market today, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin calls for Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, to step down.

"A sad day for Alaska yesterday when he was found guilty of seven felonies," she says. "But -- and now he needs to do the right thing, and the right thing is, as he's proclaiming his innocence and proclaiming, too, that he will go through the appellate process, OK, then he needs to step aside and allow our state to elect someone who will be supportive of those ideals of America: the free enterprise, the missions that we're on, to win the war, those things that have got to take place in order to progress this country. Ted Stevens has got to play a very statesmanlike role in this now."

 

She said step aside, not step down, not resign.  Has she said something since? 

I will grant that her use of the verb to progress in the transitive with this country as the object is now an obsolete form. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from