Canada wants to be a bigger brother.

by car1edb | February 12, 2009 at 10:34 am
125 views | 14 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

1984 | Photo 02

1984 | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by car1edb

Quote

OTTAWA — The Conservative government is preparing sweeping new eavesdropping legislation that will force Internet service providers to let police tap exchanges on their systems - but will likely reignite fear that Big Brother will be monitoring the private conversations of Canadians. <br><br> The goal of the move, which would require police to obtain court approval, is to close what has been described as digital "safe havens" for criminals, pedophiles and terrorists because current eavesdropping laws were written in a time before text messages, Facebook and voice-over-Internet phone lines.
BILL CURRY

The conservative gov is preparing a new legislation that will force ISPs and IXs to let police tap all communication in the name of fighting crime. -Quick, we're can't get left behind by the other UK/US big brothers!

Quote

"If you find a situation where a child is being exploited live online at that time - and that situation has arisen before - police services have had good co-operation with a lot of Internet service providers, but there are some that aren't so co-operative." <br><br> Police agencies have been calling for new laws since at least the mid-1990s. They say the situation at present provides a digital "safe haven" for criminals, pedophiles and terrorists.
News Staff
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
eastvanray

I am torn on this one.  If a court order is required then it really is no different than a tap on a criminal's phone or a bug in their residence.  If it meets the same standards of proof why should criminals be allowed to hide behind technology that simply hinders their capture?  I am no fan of Big Brother or expansion of police powers but I also do not want criminals to have the advantage.

0
car1edb

Thats right -If they wish to monitor/access someones data they should have an ISP/IX warrant specifically for that person/group/reason, etc.

Not blanket wide access that can lead to misuse of the system and data protection acts.

Why should everyone give up their right to privacy just because the authorities want a shortcut to solve a crime they could otherwise if -ermm shot in the dark, say they had more resources, pay, training etc?


0
eastvanray

Agreed.  The warrent criteria and process must be the same as today for all warrents.

0
Amy Judd

interesting - I hadn't heard of this.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

deleted_user_85309
First Flagged at 11:46 AM, Feb 12, 2009 by deleted_user_85309
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (14)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from