NP Rank:
CAP issues five-step plan for repealing DADT
The Centre for American Progress (CAP) has issued a five-step plan for repealing "Don't ask, don't tell" (DADT), the common term for the policy about homosexuality in the U.S. armed forces mandated by federal law that prohibits Gays & Lesbians from serving openly.
The Centre for American Progress (CAP) has issued a five-step plan for repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” that begins with an executive order suspending gay discharges.
According to the report, “President Obama should issue an order prohibiting the Secretary of Defence… from establishing, implementing, or applying any personnel or administrative policies, or taking a personnel or administrative action, in whole or part on the basis of sexual orientation.”
The report says that this would “include banning further dismissals on the basis of DADT.”
The legal basis for issuing such an order derives from the President’s “stop-loss” authority.
Seventy-seven members of Congress stopped short of calling for an executive order in a letter to Obama this week, but urged the White House instead to issue a moratorium suspending gay discharges from the military.
The White House responded to the Congressional letter by reiterating the President’s commitment to legislative repeal at some future point rather than an immediate administrative suspension.
Aaron Belkin, Palm Center director, questioned the logic of that statement.
“The White House acts as if an executive order and legislative repeal are mutually exclusive options,” he said.
“The whole point of the executive order is that it untangles the political stalemate and paves the way for legislative repeal.”
Robert Shrum, a Democratic party elder statesman, said that President Obama already should have issued an executive order on gay troops.
Obama could have maintained “credibility among gays,” Shrum said, “if he had issued a ‘stop-loss’ order ending the discharge of gay service members while allowing the Pentagon to proceed with a longer-term review of the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy. The President could have justified this on grounds of military need.”
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Recommendations (46)
-
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
albertacowpoke
Canada
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 11:41 on June 26th, 2009
Obama has and continues to lose support from the gay community (my self included). When he does what he said he would do, it may change my mind. But it seams that everyday brings a new story about Obama or his policies that I find disheartening.
at 13:09 on June 26th, 2009
Spydermonkey, thank you for reading, commenting, and for the recommendation. If you haven't already, you might want to read another article published on NowPublic, "Obama Stalls: Pentagon to Study Gay Ban".
The idea that a 'perceived' minority group must continue to push for equality, and then to be given the run-a-around in this so-called 'democracy', is both disheartening and a true miscarriage of justice.
However, one can not ignore the small steps (in the right direction). On Monday, June 29th, the White House will recognize accomplishments of LGBT Americans.
at 15:33 on June 26th, 2009
The broken promises, is what this sounds like.
at 02:27 on July 5th, 2009
The whole issue could be dealt with "in a single blow" by ensuring that gays in the military were covered by all US Equality laws. There are now so many other countries where having lesbians and gay men in the armed services, usually not making a secret of themselves as not heteros, is completely taken for granted. The irony is that gays have always been in the services - and it has not threatened others!