NP Rank:
Carefully Choose Not Only Your Battles, But Your Opponent As Well
I have a neighbor down the street that thinks Obama is going to not only "save the Country" but also establish an utopia like humankind has never seen before. He thinks once Obama is done, no one in America will ever need for anything. He thinks Obama is going to end hunger, poverty, drastically reduce crime and give us all World peace. Of course he also thinks Obama is going to give everybody no cost health care that will make it possible for everyone to live to be 100. I could spend HOURS with Stan and discuss the issues with him. We would go back and forth and back and forth and I doubt either of us would change our mind.
I happen to think the exact opposite of Stan. I think Obama is going to do great harm to our Country and while putting a kink into his armor in 2010 will help, the man uses Executive Orders a bit too much for my liking and he has proven that he doesn't feel the need to consult Congress as proven by his small army of Czars which he can appoint without any kind of confirmation. I think some of the damage Obama is going to do may either be very difficult to reverse or impossible altogether, much like the "New Deal" of FDR.
So how much time have Stan and I spent going back and forth?
About 5 minutes total in maybe 3 or 4 conversations.
"But Rodge, you have to try to change this guys mind! You have to expose him to the truth and get him on board with the good guys!" You might say.
I disagree and let me tell you why. Nothing I say will change Stan's mind. Arguing with him will raise my blood pressure to dangerous levels. I have chosen my battle and I have chosen my opponent based on where I feel the energy will be most effective. My battle is on Health Care Control as proposed by the Democrats and my opponent is my Congressman, Scott Murphy of the 20th District in New York. You see when it comes time to vote, Scott will have a vote, Stan won't. Scott has the power to help end this debacle, Stan can't do a thing.
I see people yelling and screaming at each other at the protests and counter protests and I can't help but think how much they are wasting there breath. It's the politicians that need to hear your voice, not the citizenry on the other side of the road. Biting there finger off does little to help the process and for God's sake, leave the guns at home. This is a health care fight, not 2nd Amendment. Slinging a semi-automatic over your shoulder distracts from the debate, it does not contribute to it.
No matter what side of this battle you are on, choose your battle and then choose your opponent and base your decision on who can make the most difference in hearing your opinion. If it's someone that isn't elected, you are probably wasting your time.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
Recommendations (57)
-
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada 
Anonymous user
-
Phyrillas
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 14:42 on September 4th, 2009
Obama is a puppy and Bush was a pit terrier that chewed America to bits. Obama has nothing really left to chew up. lol
In fact Obama is doing a very good job in the eyes of the world, yes he has made some mistakes and he is controlled by the pharmaceutic, medical and medical insurance sectors and having a free national health service is out because its too commy, lol Those poor old insurance companies would lose nice profits, lol American politics can be a real sad comedy, lol
at 16:03 on September 4th, 2009
I never considered 3% to be a nice profit and that's what the insurance companies make for profit.
at 21:20 on September 4th, 2009
5 to 8 billion dollars per year would be a good guesstimate. that's a lot of 3%, lol
at 16:07 on September 4th, 2009
This is a great piece Rodge. Yes I agree wasting your energy on someone that can't affect change is useless. Work on those elected and make them accountable. This applies equally to any other country that has a representative democracy. Elected legislators have the tendency to vote along party lines when they should be voting on behalf of their constituents.
at 16:27 on September 4th, 2009
Thank you sir, I am honored.
at 20:41 on September 4th, 2009
Good post. I am not sure if you are not a little to negative here, however Stan is certainly way to positive.