Cdn Defence Minister to Announce $5-Billion for Armoured Vehicle

by albertacowpoke | July 8, 2009 at 04:04 am
448 views | 45 Recommendations | 10 comments

Photos

Light Armoured Vehicle III | Photo 02

Light Armoured Vehicle III | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by albertacowpoke

The Canadian Minister of Defence, Peter MacKay will announce $5Billion in new funding for light armoured vehicles at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown, New Brunswick today.

This is part of a pledge by the Canadian Government to spend $45 to $50 Billion over the next 20 years for military equipment for the Canadian Forces, including the light armoured vehicle family.

The Light Armoured Vehicle family was first introduced into the Canadian Army inventory in the late 90s. 

Roughly $1Billion will be spend to upgrade the existing LAV III fleet, while the rest will be used to purchase:

  • A close-combat vehicle that would work with the army's Leopard tanks.
  • A new armoured reconnaissance vehicle.
  • A new armoured engineering vehicle to carry equipment such as plows and building materials.

Lieutenant General Andy Leslie, Chief of the Land Staff (Commander of the Army) earlier this year warned of  the effect the present operational tempo of the Canadian Forces is having on its equipment and manpower.

General Leslie proposed an upgrade program for the LAV III which could be made in facilities in London, Ontario and Edmonton, Alberta.

This increased new funding should assist with alleviating this problem for the time being.

The announcement will be welcomed by the Canadian Forces, especially infantry units.  Many modifications have been made to the LAV III in Afghanistan to improve protection and mobility.

There have also been concerns regarding rollovers with this vehicle.  Here is a Canadian Defence Procurment fact sheet.

In the past, Governments kept equipment on the inventory until it had outgrown its usefulness. An  example of this is total fleet replacements of the Centurian tank for Leopards in 1977 and the M113 Armoured Personel Carrier, which was introduced into the Canadian Forces in 1964 and stayed in service until the late 90s.

The federal government will announce roughly $5 billion in new funding for light armoured vehicles for the military, including repairs to the LAV III fleet, CBC News has learned.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay will make the announcement Wednesday during a stop at CFB Gagetown in New Brunswick.

Roughly $1 billion will be used to upgrade LAV III models.

The remaining $4 billion is to be spent on a "new family of land combat vehicles" that would include:

  • A close-combat vehicle that would work with the army's Leopard tanks.
  • A new armoured reconnaissance vehicle.
  • A new armoured engineering vehicle to carry equipment such as plows and building materials.

The Conservative party's 2008 election platform pledged to invest $45 billion to $50 billion over the next 20 years to buy equipment for the Canadian Forces, including "land vehicle fleets."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
158

That seems like a lot of money.

Just how many armored cars does the Canadian army have?

0
albertacowpoke

I don.t have the exact inventory figures of the CF, but I suspect it is in excess of  1000 LAVs on the inventory, possibly more when you look at various variations for Engineers, Mobile Repair Teams, etc.  Mortars, TOW Anti Armour Vehicles etc.

Retrofit of vehicles won.t be cheap either.

There is also the Coyote Masted Reconnaissance vehicle.

We have six regular force Mechanized Infantry Battalions and Three Light Infantry Battlions.  The light battalions convert to Mechanized Infantry when deployed to Afghanistan.  All soldiers are trained in Mechanized warfare.  The light infantry battalions specialize in Mountain warfare and airborne and heliborne operations.

Here is the organization of a Mechanized Infantry Platoon.



1
158

Thanks for the link

I like military organization data.

1
Barbara McPherson

About time the government started funding new equipment.  We shouldn't have to depend on other countries' obsolete submarines either!  We have three oceans to keep track of.

0
albertacowpoke

The submarine acquisition was really dumb.  We had to refurbish them.  I don't even know if they're in service yet.

1
158

moonwolf

just what do you think would happen if Nato leaves Afghanistan.

Will peace break out? will groups who have killed each other for decades suddenly stop killing.?

What would keep a bad situation from getting worse?


2
albertacowpoke

There may be people behind the scenes pushing for CF-18 involvement in Afghanistan.  I doubt very much though that any politician would even consider it.  Although the public generally supports our troops in theatre and have accepted the idea that this mission will end in 2011, I doubt that they would keep quiet on the escalation of efforts.

Personally, I don't think that the military mission will continue past 2011 for the simple reason that our troops suffer operational fatigue.  I saw a very interesting interview with General Walt Natynchy on CBC a few days ago.  He makes it very clear that the Canadian Forces cannot continue with the present operational tempo.  This is also the case with equipment.

Take into consideration that those same troops, at the officer and non commissioned officer level, have been going on tours, starting with the former Yugoslavia in the early 90s, first as part of the UN (General Lew MacKenzie) and then as part of NATO.  With a force of 65,000 that is hardly sustainable.  Of those 65,000 only 9 Battalions do the dirty grunt work.

With one battlions deployed, one getting ready to deploy and one recuperating from the tour (sort of) it is not hard to figure out that can't last very long.  The remaining troops are involved in the various training establishments across the country.

I agree with your assessment of a quagmire.  In fact, the sucess of the Obama strategy has been in question as well.  Just today Brigadier General Nicholson, who commands 9000 US troops in Afghanistan, in a 30 minute teleconference said to do the mission he needed more troops. 

Although Op Kanjar (Strike of the Sword) started with great fanfare, 4000 troops don.t last very long when u have to leave some behind in every town or hamlet that you occupy.  He stated he wanted more Afghan troops.  Well, they have to be trained first.

The problem with the present policy is that in order to rebuild the country, you need to provide security first.  Only 600 ANA soldiers are available to Op Kanjar.

Nicholson was careful not to ask for more US troops, apparently he had been told not to by the National Security Advisor, General Jones.

3
albertacowpoke

Here is Afghanistan On Line.  It contains a 4 part History of Afghanistan.  Perhaps it will resolve some arguments.

1
Dark_horse|_spirit

The 30mm cannon and turret planned in the upgrade I believe is designed more for protecting our newly aquired Leapords as they are an amazing machine, and amazingly expensive. The armour upgrades that are being discussed can only weight down an already top heavy machine. I believe that if this governement is planning any upgrades we need to seriously look at high composite chobham(space age armour). It's reflective heat resistance mesh wiring can greatly increase the lives of the crew and the expensive gun and onboard detection systems. Having this kind of protection will also increase the operating capabilities of the Leopard as well. The Lav 3 is the premier body guard in the dessert right now. It provides civillian, convoy, logistic and troop coverage, no other fighting vehicle can boast such a operations portfolio.  To all those niegh sayers I think that you take to much for granted in this country, like your freedom. For our military to properly do thier jobs they need the right tools and training, and the support of the Canadian people. The world is watching and learning from our mistakes with the Lav 3, when the theater is over in 2012 I am confident that the plants in London and Edmonton will have there fill of orders from Army's around the world. And our army training our allies in what it is exactly that we have learned while fighting in the dessert.

0
albertacowpoke

The lessons learned over the past 7  years have been incredible.  The Canadian Maneouvre  Training Centre is a state of the art facility, which is the envy of the world.  Similar training is conducted by the British Army at CFB Suffield, near Medicine Hat, Alberta.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

thomps
First Flagged at 4:12 AM, Jul 8, 2009 by thomps
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (45)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from