NP Rank:
Charlie Rose and the Republicans
Public service announcement
It was probably one of the best debate formats ever in Presidential elections. With candidates seated about a round table and questions coming from both well-prepared journalists and from the community at large this was a meaningful exchange that let voters evaluate candidate content, performance, and style.
The headline in the Washington Post today says Romney sustained his front-runner status. Yes he did. Michele Bachmann did much better without gaffes. She positioned herself as a foster mother of 23 children. With all of that responsibility, she had better stick with that job and that of part time member of the House of Representatives.
Herman Cain pitched 9-9-9 as if that is all he has. I think it is. He is a little simplistic and attacked Romney’s 59 point plan. Romney said the problem is complex and we need to overhaul the complete American economic system. That’s what I have been saying and I agree.
Rick Perry just wants to turn the nation into individual states doing the best they can their own way because governors know best. He wants to be head of the Ponderosa with a bunch franchises. Herman Cain could say, I already did that in pizza.
Ron Paul sounded like a smart alec. He doesn’t like Alan Greenspan one bit. He wants to bust into the Federal Reserve and count the gold. Romney said that isn’t the first thing he would do because that doesn’t create jobs.
My favorite candidate, Jon Huntsman, was so quiet I think he thought he was at a Mormon Church service. He didn’t think it would be prudent to attack the Chinese or to initiate trade wars. I think he is bucking to be Secretary of State.
Rick Santorum was like a little man who could not be heard. He tried to change the subject to something he wanted to talk about but it came off as his being oblique and at a different event altogether.
Newt Gingrich was the master of unity and made the comment that anyone around the table could perform better as President than Obama. I agree, Charlie Rose may have been a better President and that journalist from Bloomberg News was especially sharp.
“Mitt Romney solidifies his front-runner status in Republican debate By Philip Rucker and Amy Gardner, Published: October 11 HANOVER, N.H. — A comfortable and confident Mitt Romney solidified his front-runner status on Tuesday night in the battle for the Republican presidential nomination, navigating 90 minutes of tough questions on the economy from his rivals and debate moderators. All eight Republican hopefuls who shared an intimate round table on the debate stage at Dartmouth College clamored to blame Washington for the country’s economic ills. In turn, they pointed fingers at President Obama, the Federal Reserve and the government in general, although they sparred over the details of their plans to grow the economy. The participants uniformly criticized Obama and official Washington for, in their view, not reviving the economy and for stunting its growth with too many regulations, overreach by the Federal Reserve and inadequate tax relief. This time, the candidate with whom Romney had to share the spotlight was Herman Cain. The businessman has soared in opinion polls but faced a crush of scrutiny in Tuesday’s debate on an economic plan that he referred to again and again but that his rivals dismissed as overly simplistic and unrealistic. Cain countered that the simplicity of his “9-9-9” plan to gut thefederal tax code is its virtue, and he used it to separate himself as a bold outsider in a field of politicians. During a portion of Tuesday’s Washington Post-Bloomberg debate in which each candidate had a chance to ask another a question, four posed queries to Romney, acknowledging his position as the one to beat. Meanwhile, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who was looking to revive his struggling campaign, seized few moments. He stayed silent for long stretches in the debate. When asked how he would fix the nation’ssputtering economy, he said only that he would develop new energy resources. Even when pressed, he offered few specifics. “What we need to be focused on in this country today is not whether or not we are going to have this policy or that policy,” he said. “What we need to be focused on is how we get Americans working again.” At another moment, Perry quipped: “Mitt’s had six years to be working on a plan. I’ve been in this for about eight weeks.” In one exchange, Cain, a former Godfather’s Pizza executive, challenged Romney to name all 59 points in his 160-page economic plan, suggesting that it failed Cain’s test to be “simple, transparent, efficient, fair and neutral” in contrast to Cain’s proposal. But the former Massachusetts governor did not hesitate to make the case that the complexity of his plan reflects the complexity of the nation’s problems, and that he has the depth of experience, business know-how and ability to deal with those problems. “I have had the experience in my life of taking on some tough problems,” Romney said. “And I must admit that simple answers are always very helpful but oftentimes inadequate. And in my view, to get this economy going again, we’re going to have to deal with more than just tax policy and just energy policy, even though both of those are part of my plan.””
It was Romney by a length.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 03:00 on October 12th, 2011
For me, I would like President Obama to have some competitors from his party and make him sit around a table and defend himself.
at 10:25 on October 12th, 2011
Maybe got to think about this in a political way..Causing conflict among democratic voters in that way, would only help weaken an already weak democratic electorate. Unless Obama is impeachable or totally incompetent, it's best to see what republicans can actually throw up against him.
at 10:34 on October 12th, 2011
Rick Perry has it right. Let Washington set out the regulations and national policy on government services but, let the States deliver them. And yes, the States do know better. They have an immediate relationship with their needs that politicians in Washington and your big central government approach could never ever meet.
at 12:10 on October 12th, 2011
While we're at it, in the Internet age, why not have Representatives and Senators perform from their home districts. They can vote and legislate by wire where their electorate can keep closer tabs on them.
at 12:20 on October 12th, 2011
Need them all in one place for big business and power broker lobbying goons..Plus they need to 'interact'.. Politics ya know !
at 12:50 on October 12th, 2011
How about government by national referendum? Get rid of Congress all together. LOL.