NP Rank:
China may be fly in ointment RE sanctions against Iran
Speaking with regard to recent energy deals agreed to between Iran and China, and of the latter's veto power in the UN Assembly along with its protection of Iran, the New York Times points out that this may snag the punitive sanctions against Ahmadinejad promised by Obama and leaders of France and Great Britain last week:
The string of energy deals appalled the Democratic chairman of the Foreign Affairs committee, Representative Howard Berman of California, who called them “exactly the wrong message” to send to an Iran that seemed determined to flout international nuclear rules.But some analysts see another message: as the United States issues new calls to punish Iran for secretly expanding its nuclear program, it is not at all clear that Washington’s interests are the same as Beijing’s.
That will make it doubly difficult, these analysts say, to push meaningful sanctions against Iran through the United Nations Security Council, where China not only holds a veto but has been one of Iran’s more reliable defenders.
“Their threat perception on this issue is different from ours,” said Zalmay Khalilzad, who as the American ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bushhelped persuade China to approve limited sanctions against Iran. “They don’t see Iran in the same way as we do.”
François Godement, a prominent China scholar and president of the Paris-based Asia Center, put it more bluntly. “Basically,” he said, “the rise of Iran is not bad news for China.”
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States




Comments (0)