NP Rank:
China spends billions in Sri lanka to build port
China has begun construction of a naval port in Hambantota which it plans to to use as a refuelling and docking station for its navy, as it patrols the Indian Ocean and protects China’s supplies of Saudi oil.
On the southern coast of Sri Lanka, ten miles from one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, a vast construction site is engulfing the once sleepy fishing town of Hambantota.
The cost of the port is estimated at $ 1 billion. It was in March 2007 that Sri lanka and China came into agreement to build the port. Because of the agreement between the two countries, China has given Sri lanka all the aid, arms and diplomatic support it needs to defeat the Tigers, without worrying about the West.
This is where China is building a $1 billion port that it plans to use as a refuelling and docking station for its navy, as it patrols the Indian Ocean and protects China’s supplies of Saudi oil. Ever since Sri Lanka agreed to the plan, in March 2007, China has given it all the aid, arms and diplomatic support it needs to defeat the Tigers, without worrying about the West.
Although China says that Hambantota is a purely commercial venture, many US and Indian military planners regard it as part of a “string of pearls” strategy under which China is also building or upgrading ports at Gwadar in Pakistan, Chittagong in Bangladesh and Sittwe in Burma.
The Chinese say that Hambantota is a purely commercial venture, but many US and Indian military planners regard it as part of a “string of pearls” strategy under which China is also building or upgrading ports at Gwadar in Pakistan, Chittagong in Bangladesh and Sittwe in Burma.
Although China was Sri lanka's biggest arms supplier in the 1990s, its arms sales increased significantly to Sri Lanka since 2007, when the US suspended military aid over human rights issues.
China has cultivated ties with Sri Lanka for decades and became its biggest arms supplier in the 1990s, when India and Western governments refused to sell weapons to Colombo for use in the civil war. Beijing appears to have increased arms sales significantly to Sri Lanka since 2007, when the US suspended military aid over human rights issues.
Many of the arms have been bought through Lanka Logistics & Technologies, co-headed by Gotabhaya Rajapksa, the Defence Secretary, who is also the President’s brother.
In April 2007 Sri Lanka signed a classified $37.6 million (£25 million) deal to buy Chinese ammunition and ordnance for its army and navy, according to Jane’s Defence Weekly.
China gave Sri Lanka — apparently free of charge — six F7 jet fighters last year, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, after a daring raid by the Tigers’ air wing destroyed ten military aircraft in 2007. One of the Chinese fighters shot down one of the Tigers’ aircraft a year later.
“China’s arms sales have been the decisive factor in ending the military stalemate,” Brahma Chellaney, of the Centre for Policy Research in Delhi, said. “There seems to have been a deal linked to Hambantota.”
Since 2007 China has encouraged Pakistan to sell weapons to Sri Lanka and to train Sri Lankan pilots to fly the Chinese fighters, according to Indian security sources.
China has also provided crucial diplomatic support in the UN Security Council, blocking efforts to put Sri Lanka on the agenda. It has also boosted financial aid to Sri Lanka, even as Western countries have reduced their contributions.
In 2005, China gave Sri lanka only a few million dollars in aid but by last year, it was estimated that Sri lanka received almost $ 1 billion. This amount was far greater than the aid received by the United States and Britain.
B. Raman of the Chennai Centre for China Studies says Sri Lanka has been so dismissive of international criticism because it can rely on support from China.
China’s aid to Sri Lanka jumped from a few million dollars in 2005 to almost $1 billion last year, replacing Japan as the biggest foreign donor. By comparison, the United States gave $7.4 million last year, and Britain just £1.25 million.“That’s why Sri Lanka has been so dismissive of international criticism,” said B. Raman of the Chennai Centre for China Studies. “It knows it can rely on support from China.”
Most Recommended Comment
Recommendations (13)
-
gerrypopplestone
London and elsewhere, United Kingdom -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada 
Anonymous user



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 03:31 on May 2nd, 2009
Personally, I would not call Hambantota a sleepy little town! It's an important and busy part of that coast. It suffered hugely during the tsanumai and I'm not surprised someone is adding something to the commerce there. But it badly needs a decent railway connection with the rest of the south. At present, Hambantota is cut off through bad road networks both from Colombo and the Hill Country. The railway was promised by President Premadasa in the 80s. Yet nothing happened! Just along the coast a bit at Kirinda, the Japanese built a new fishing harbour a few years ago - it got swamped with sand in no time!! Lets hope this port has better pre-planning investigations!
at 03:34 on May 2nd, 2009
Hi gerrypopplestone!
Wow, You are well informed, as I see better than suranee who lives in Sri Lanka! :-))
Apart from that you cant take her serious! :D
at 07:47 on May 2nd, 2009
Thank you Gerrypopplestone for your comment.
I'm sure that this port which the Chinese are building will have a "much better pre-planning investigations" because the Rajapakse regime will do all it can to make sure it does. After all, they can't disappoint a country they rely on aid by not giving China all the support to make sure the construction goes well and that the naval port is solid.
But what concerns me is that the Rajapakse regime has sold a certain part of my country's coast to another country China, to be used for that country's advantage.
at 04:58 on May 3rd, 2009
Let's hope you are right, Suranee! I remember (some years ago) huge publicity being given to planned improvements to Galle port - the plan for it was supposed to make Galle competitive with Singapore! I visit there most years and haven't noticed any changes yet! My worry about Hambantota (which I also visit regularly) is that the prevailing currents there do wash the sand inwards. It's not likeTrinco, which I would have thought was a much better place for planning large scale improvements. (I gather that India has plans for Trinco!!). I wish the Chinese the best of luck and, as you point out, selling off the coastline sets a dangerous precedent! Also, I found these two comments:
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />Hambantota Port: A New Dawn For The South Savan Wijewardena⋅November, 2008 ⋅“But over the last 60 years, the people of this country have seen several many much vaunted infrastructure projects fail and stall – the half built Katunayake expressway, the still struggling Norochcholai power plant, assorted foundation stones for international airports, etc. The Hambantota port project is arguably the country’s largest development project since the Mahaweli scheme and simply cannot be allowed to fail. The financial, economic and environmental cost of leaving the project unfinished will be too much for the country to bear”.
(I would agree on this – when I last looked at the highway (somewhere near Galle) it was happening but very slowly).
But I also found this: (www.srilankannews.com)
“The Hambantota Port Development Project is facing suspension by end of September as a result of a serious cash flow crisis due to the government's failure to pay the contractor his dues. The government owes the contractor, China Harbour-Sinohydro Consortium US$ 117mn for the work completed but is yet to make payment despite repeated appeals, it is learned. On September 3, the China Harbour Consortium wrote to Ports Minister Chamal Rajapakse they will be compelled to suspend work on the project by September 30 unless the US$ 117 million (approx Rs. 12.5 billion) due is paid. (short edition)”.
I see also that the Matara-Kataragama railway is in the planning pipeline. It is certainly much needed, given the huge numbers that regularly go to the festivals.