Civilians are from Venus, Military are from Mars

by MilanSturgis | September 24, 2009 at 02:01 am
164 views | 38 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

A title here is required | Photo 812

A title here is required | Photo 812

see larger image

uploaded by MilanSturgis

The one issue that keeps raising its head in reconstructing Afghanistan is the need for a harmonization between civilian and military elements.  This has been an challenge not only in Afghanistan but in Iraq and every other operation that we have undertaken in recent memory.  It has been stated more than once that civilian organizations be it State, USAID or NGO’s operate very differently than the military.  One Rand study comparison stated the military operates as a fire department whereas civilian agencies are more of a police model.  The police have a steady state of operations, they patrol the streets everyday, they do community outreach , you simply see them out and about daily.  The fire department on the other hand operates more in a crisis mode more reactive in nature.  They wait for the emergency call and then respond. It is interesting to apply this to a military/civilian model because in many cases it mirrors the police/fire analogy.  The military until recently have been more of a reactive force in Afghanistan responding to emergencies and “putting out the fire.” Civilian agencies have had more of that steady state presence always being visible on the streets and in the villages.  This has slowly been changing over the past months with the new US commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal shifting the focus of forces to protect the population and not just hunting insurgents. This is the first step in securing the population and giving the Afghan people hope for a better life. Separating ourselves from the reason we are there will serve nobody’s purpose except the Taliban, the time for just sitting and responding to the alarm has passed-the alarm bell is now constantly ringing.    

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

The strategy that General McChrystal is recommending if workable, but will require a substantial increase in military forces. 

Does NATO and specifically the U.S. have the appetite to deploy more troops that won't produce instant results. 

It seems to me that the so called community policing advocated here also requires a change in the thinking of Afghans.  Time will tell.


0
MilanSturgis

Karl,

All excellent points.  The other issue is having a strategic partner in a respected Afghan government-this is looking more problematic by the day. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
First Flagged at 2:12 AM, Sep 24, 2009 by Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (38)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from