NP Rank:
Colombia President Uribe admits Red Cross Emblem misuse
Today´s admission by Colombian President Alvaro Uribe over the misuse of the Red Cross Emblem during the recent "intelligence" operation to rescue Ingrid Betancourt is rather worrying. Few days back it also emerged Colombian Military forces also used Telesur emblem.
International Organisations are very concern over the misuse of their emblems. In the case of the International Red Cross such misuse can certainly have far reaching negative consequences over those it tries to help. Its credibility and legitimacy can be tainted by fake and misuse. Was the rescue of FARC hostages worthy the negative effects on other humanitarian misions of the Red Cross?
Colombia admits Red Cross misuse
Alvaro Uribe, Colombia's president, has said his army used the Red Cross emblem in its June 2 operation to rescue 15 hostages including Ingrid Betancourt. "We regret that this occurred," Uribe said on Wednesday, following reports that the Red Cross emblem was displayed on a vest worn by a Colombian intelligence officer who took part in the rescue mission. The officer's name was not disclosed because "we do not want to affect his career", the president said. The Colombian government issued a formal apology to the ICRC for the incident, which the president called an unauthorised error by a nervous soldier.
Use of the Red Cross symbol for a military operation violates the first Geneva Convention because it would damage the relief group's image of neutrality in conflicts and could endanger medical personnel using the symbol.
Red Cross reminder
Yves Heller, a Bogota-based spokesman for the Red Cross, said: "Parties to the conflict must respect the Red Cross emblem at all times and under all circumstances". However, Heller said the incident will not effect Red Cross deployment in the country. "We will continue working in the field in Colombia," he said.
Betancourt, a former Colombian presidential candidate, and the other hostages were rescued in a daring operation by the Colombian military. Their captors from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) were tricked into handing them over to the intelligence officials disguised as aid workers. While Betancourt was freed after six years in captivity, some had been helt hostage for as long as 10 years.
Related sources: BBC. El Tiempo, Semana, RCN, Caracol,
Related stories: Chavez: FARC hostages liberated (updated IV), Four FARC Hostages released (Updated III)
PS: Anonymous comments are not welcome as they promote bias and diminish Citizen Journalism. Just like anonymous sources, they impaired the right to information and distort notions on confidential sources.
News Tools
July 16, 2008 at 05:55 pm by rahul, 268 views, 4 comments
![]()
is reporting fromMember
NP Rank:




Add a comment
Comments (4)
- reply
FARC (not verified)at 18:05 on July 16th, 2008
They should use the Venezuelan flag instead.
at 18:23 on July 16th, 2008
May I bring to your kind attention that anonymous comments are not welcome as they promote bias and diminish Citizen Journalism. Just like anonymous sources, they impaired the right to information and distort notions on confidential sources. Furthermore, by resorting to this anonymous message the force of your ideas is greatly diminished. Please refrain from further commenting this way if you would like to participate in any kind of communication or receive answer to your queries.
at 08:27 on July 17th, 2008
rahul, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 08:31 on July 17th, 2008
Was the rescue of FARC hostages worthy the negative effects on other humanitarian misions of the Red Cross?
Certainly not. Although, I wasn't one of the prisoners.
If FARC had misused the emblem there would be a lot more condemnation.