A Conservative for Obama

by moonwolf | September 19, 2008 at 07:18 am | 544 views | 21 comments | 70 recommendations

John McCain is losing the battle to retain the real conservative base in the Republican Party.  His rubber stamping of George W. Bush's disastrous policies and obvious desire to drag the entire USA further down Bush's dark 'road to perdition' has real conservatives jumping the sinking GOP ship and taking their votes, often with great sadness, to  Barrack Obama and the Democrats. 

Long time conservative Wick Allison, ex-organizer for Barry Goldwater and other well-known Republican politicians says, "My Party has slipped its moorings.  It's time for a true pragmatist to lead the country." as he lays out the reasons for his sober choice to leave the ideologues and religious fanatics driving the McCain campaign behind.

The more I listen and read about “the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate,” the more I like him. Barack Obama strikes a chord with me like no political figure since Ronald Reagan. To explain why, I need to explain why I am a conservative and what it means to me.

In 1964, at the age of 16, I organized the Dallas County Youth for Goldwater. My senior thesis at the University of Texas was on the conservative intellectual revival in America. Twenty years later, I was invited by William F. Buckley Jr. to join the board of National Review. I later became its publisher.

Conservatism to me is less a political philosophy than a stance, a recognition of the fallibility of man and of man’s institutions. Conservatives respect the past not for its antiquity but because it represents, as G.K. Chesterton said, the democracy of the dead; it gives the benefit of the doubt to customs and laws tried and tested in the crucible of time. Conservatives are skeptical of abstract theories and utopian schemes, doubtful that government is wiser than its citizens, and always ready to test any political program against actual results.

Liberalism always seemed to me to be a system of “oughts.” We ought to do this or that because it’s the right thing to do, regardless of whether it works or not. It is a doctrine based on intentions, not results, on feeling good rather than doing good.

But today it is so-called conservatives who are cemented to political programs when they clearly don’t work. The Bush tax cuts—a solution for which there was no real problem and which he refused to end even when the nation went to war—led to huge deficit spending and a $3 trillion growth in the federal debt. Facing this, John McCain pumps his “conservative” credentials by proposing even bigger tax cuts. Meanwhile, a movement that once fought for limited government has presided over the greatest growth of government in our history. That is not conservatism; it is profligacy using conservatism as a mask.

Today it is conservatives, not liberals, who talk with alarming bellicosity about making the world “safe for democracy.” It is John McCain who says America’s job is to “defeat evil,” a theological expansion of the nation’s mission that would make George Washington cough out his wooden teeth.

This kind of conservatism, which is not conservative at all, has produced financial mismanagement, the waste of human lives, the loss of moral authority, and the wreckage of our economy that McCain now threatens to make worse.

recommend Add a comment
Emilio Lizardo
Emilio Lizardo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:45 on September 19th, 2008

'But today it is so-called conservatives who are cemented to political programs when they clearly don’t work.'

Yep - We can all start to live more realistically, or we can continue down the road we're presently on : Mutually Assured Destruction ( MAD ) ...

0
moonwolf

Or Mutually Assured Dementia (MAD)

Thanks Emilio, but careful, you used the "r" word!  (:D)


0
SOLARLIFE

Emilo, like always MAD best comment

0
bill hicks

Over 30 years ago the American public wanted to clean out all Nixon memories and voted Jimmy Carter, the rabbit talking president into office.  He promised change just like Obama.  That change lasted about 2 months and he succombed to corrupt congressmen.  Both Republicans and Democrats were anxious for the next election.  Our national defense was dismantled in secret.  Our economy faced depression.

Oh there will be some foolish conservatives just like there were then, but GOD help us if Barack Hussein Obama wins.

I was one of those fools.

0
moonwolf

bill,

Better start writing that final prayer!


0
Wino

I think you miss the point that Bush and McCain aren't conservative at all, especially when it comes to spending.  If you want to have a United States that is owned by China, continue down this path. Bush and his potential sucessor, McCain, are leading us where not only our military and economy will be crippled, but our potentially our Democracy.

Conservative, the word that so many in the US use to describe themselves, doesn't carry the same meaning any longer. With Republicans hitching themselves to the religious right it is becoming more akin to extreemist or theocrat.

Oh, and Bill Hicks, your use of Obama's middle name as a means to paint him as a Muslim or relative of Saddam is childish and doen't help me take you seriously.

 

0
BruceC

Isn't that his name?  Do you think he is muslim?  I hope not.  That would mean he is lying to us again.

0
Wino

It is funny that he has the same name.  I say no more to preemptive war anyhow. 

The boy's name Hussein \hu(s)-sein\ is pronounced hoo-SAYN. It is of Arabic origin, and its meaning is "good; small handsome one". The name of a prominent person in Shiite Islam and a royal name in Jordan.

SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:33 on September 19th, 2008

moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff. I can understand that people doubt about McCain's think tank, having spain in the subcontinent of spanish speaking south america; as well as 2 month ago,  he thought Putin is the president of germany. As Schumpeter/Harvard is proposing constructive destruction, no other way.

dunkelberg
dunkelberg
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:42 on September 19th, 2008

But today it is so-called conservatives who are cemented to political programs when they clearly don’t work. . . . Meanwhile, a movement that once fought for limited government has presided over the greatest growth of government in our history. That is not conservatism; it is profligacy* using conservatism as a mask.

Nail on the head, as they say.

*

profligacy 1. dissolute or immoral behavior.
2. reckless and extravagant spending or behavior. — profligate, adj.



0
moonwolf

Thanks Solar and dunkelberg.  Like many great words in English profligacy actually sounds as it means.

Barbara McPherson
Barbara McPherson
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:53 on September 19th, 2008

moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.  Beautifully written.  While Canadian politics are not as dire as the US ones, I especially like your comparison of conservatism vs liberalism.

0
moonwolf

Thanks Barbara,

But I cannot take credit for the prose. The quiet logic and power in his words was inescapable though.


ESKCSG
ESKCSG
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:55 on September 19th, 2008

moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.

master_jim2008
master_jim2008
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:57 on September 19th, 2008

moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.

And 10 times worse it will be!!

Wino
Wino
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:04 on September 19th, 2008

moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.

politisite
politisite
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:07 on September 19th, 2008

moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.  You know Goldwater was a different kind of conservative, He was Fiscal Responsible and non-interventionist.  Bush and McCain have fought about almost everything.  The are not alike except both are defense conservatives.  Bush is not a fiscal conservative.   BTW, Washington did not have, "wooden Teeth", they were made of Brass and Ivory.  Another Fable, like Washington never prayed to a God who intervened in human affairs.

0
Wino

I am trying to understand the last statement.  Since our founding fathers prayed it is proper and acceptable for modern politicians to proseltyze? They also owned slaves, should we bring that practice back too?

0
BruceC

I do not think anyone wants whoopi to be their slave even if she paid them and begged.

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:14 on September 19th, 2008

moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
moonwolf

Thanks all for the commentary and flags.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

September 19, 2008 at 07:18 am by moonwolf, 544 views, 21 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from