NP Rank:
Controversy erupts over Malcolm X's bisexual past
by Rhonda J Mangus | November 7, 2009 at 05:43 am
1190 views | 77 Recommendations | 27 comments
Controversy erupted over African American nationalist and civil rights leader Malcolm X's bisexual past when reporters outed Malcolm X as a bisexual man during Britain's October celebration of National Black History Month.
A few black activists were outraged recently by Malcolm X's name appearing on lists of GLBT black leaders. Also, Nation of Islam leaders were upset about the allegations, even though it was clear that his bisexual experiences occurred well before he joined their religion.
Journalist Peter Tatchell, of the UK Guardian said that Malcolm X "engaged in a myriad of gay, sexual relationships and was bisexual." He also wrote that several black activists have tried to cover up the gay history of this leader.
The slain activist's sexuality was already revealed nearly two decades ago in an acclaimed biography by Bruce Perry: "Malcolm – The Life of a Man Who Changed Black America."
According to Perry: "His male-to-male encounters, which rendered it unnecessary for him to compete for women, afforded him an opportunity for sexual release without the attendant risk of dependence on women."
Malcolm X's famous saying "By any means necessary" may be more real than anyone ever imagined about this charismatic leader.
Read accounts of close boyhood friends of Malcolm X, here.
Related stories on NowPublic by this author, here.
Also on NowPublic The 44th Anniversary of the Assassination of Malcolm X, Opinion piece by NowPublic author Karen Hatter, February 2009.
Crowd Power
First Flagged at 6:00 AM, Nov 7, 2009 by generaldecay
These members have powered this story:-
pingnews.com
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States
Recommendations (77)
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Frank Liao
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Mritunjay
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
-
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
tikun
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
Tomitheos
Toronto, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (27)
at 06:00 on November 7th, 2009
This is certainly news to me, Rhonda. Thanks for posting about it. It will be interesting to see the how supporters (and critics) react to this revelation.
at 06:01 on November 7th, 2009
Rhonda, sorry about the confusion there if you received lots of 'generaldecay did this and then that' messages. My recommend wouldn't take!
at 06:12 on November 7th, 2009
No need to apologize:)! And, no worries about the 'generaldecay did this and then that' messages. I'm always glad to hear from you. In any event, there seems to be some glitches in the system this morning. I'm sure the tech team will be on it soon:)!
Perry's book sounds like a very interesting read. The accounts of close boyhood friends is an eye-opener. The critics are already speaking:)!
at 06:22 on November 7th, 2009
There have been a few glitches this morning but it seems fine now.
Yes, the critics will have more to say about this than the supporters, I dare say!
at 06:32 on November 7th, 2009
"Yes, the critics will have more to say about this than the supporters, I dare say!"
Let's hope not, right?:)
at 06:19 on November 7th, 2009
This is very interesting, and the subject of bisexuality is an important one: Roy had recently asked me why there seemed nothing posted on that subject. Freud had the belief that it is there in everyone to a degree. Very good posting!!!
at 06:21 on November 7th, 2009
It is an important one indeed.
And that Freud had a lot of ideas, it has to be said. I was teaching him recently and I was met with a lot of bemused undergraduate faces, and more than a few giggles!
at 06:31 on November 7th, 2009
Thank you, smk! Yes, I remember Roy's mention of nothing being posted on bisexuality. The topic of human sexuality is very broad--!:)
at 06:39 on November 7th, 2009
This is for Roy:) -- Mike Syzmanski is the Bisexuality Examiner for examiner.com. I find his articles interesting.
at 07:03 on November 7th, 2009
Roy will be here. He knows it all on Malcolm X as Hatter had to find out. He won't be surprised. So much has not been told yet...God Bless his family
at 07:23 on November 7th, 2009
Also at NowPublic:
The 44th Anniversary of the Assassination of Malcolm X
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/44th-anniversary-assassination-malcolm-x
at 17:33 on November 8th, 2009
Thanks for stopping by and for the link, Karen. Sorry I overlooked it; I have added it at the end of this story. Thanks again!
at 08:03 on November 7th, 2009
Please, no baiting and taunting each other on this thread - Rhonda doesn't want it I'm sure and I don't either. Keep the discussion civil and not personal as I would hate to have to close down the comment thread to such a potentially interesting discussion.
at 17:35 on November 8th, 2009
Thank you, Amy:)!
at 08:05 on November 7th, 2009
This may be an incredibly naive question, but why is everyone so outraged?
at 17:37 on November 8th, 2009
Good question, Amy! Evidently it is very difficult to be Black & Gay in America.
at 09:38 on November 7th, 2009
If it is the truth, I suppose we should know about it.
Personally, my opinion is that bisexuality occurs in extreme situations where contact with the opposite sex is impossible or where the sexual identity of the individual has been interfered with, opposed and suppressed by something in the family nexus.
Even some cases of transsexual men about which I have seen documentaries, the men appear to have been exposed to a lot of hostility from their fathers.
The reason some are outraged is that Malcolm X has iconic status and therefore has a cult-like following. I admire him greatly myself, I have to say. If his bisexuality involved him being the feminine partner, that is something that won't go down well at all.
Bisexuality appears still, whether rightly or wrongly, to be a sign of weakened masculinity, compromised masculinity, whereas the reality is that primate bisexuality for the dominant males was the norm in some situations.
That dominant sexuality, though, is expressed as the masculine partner, the dominator, not the feminine one, the dominated.
Rome, Italy, where I lived for three years, seemed to have the largest bisexual population I had ever been around. A friend of mine from the Bay Area had the same impression. Milan didn't feel like that at all. Ancient Rome was the same, though it was looked down upon because it is a threat to the stability of the family and marriage.
PS : Women's bisexuality is seen very differently, as differently as how totally acceptable and normal two women dancing together on a show such as American Bandstand, in the '50s and '60s was. If men had danced together, that would be seen in a real negative light.
at 17:40 on November 8th, 2009
"If it is the truth, I suppose we should know about it."
'We' should definitely know about it!:)
Thanks for sharing your opinion, Roy! Always deeply appreciated!
at 10:25 on November 7th, 2009
people are individuals and should not be credited or discredited based on their sexuality
statistics are only visible if people volunteer the information, and to be free to speak about those issues depends on the country, so perhaps the largest bi-sexual population is living somewhere in secrecy in a country that does not have the public freedoms we are accustomed to
in my social studies a survey on seniors over 75 yrs old were asked about any same sex encounters in their lifetime, 1 in 3 admitted to having an experience that would qualify as a bi-sexual encounter but also added that they did not pursue the same-sex relationship because of how society at that time labelled a bi-sexual as a type of sex offender which would bypass any legitimate work / life accomplishments and even carried a jail sentence / brutality beatings by police.
If Malcolm X were still alive he would be 84 years old, he overcame so many obstacles, if this was one of them that makes him even more admirable but I care more about his life changing principles than his personal sex life.
at 12:22 on November 7th, 2009
What you do responsibly and irresponsibly with your sex organs does define a person to a great deal, as responsible or irresponsible to begin with, as much as what you do with your brain, heart and the rest.
You can also think that a man's masculinity is not compromised by being at feminine pole of a relationship, but the world will not agree with you.
at 12:32 on November 7th, 2009
I don't judge his bisexuality. I am telling you how the world does it. I accept his identity without judging him.
He became an extremely responsible husband and father and he got killed for revealing the corruption within the Black Muslim organization and for renouncing its racist tenants. I have a great deal of admiration for him.
I will tell you, though, that, as a husband, I doubt he ever cheated on his wife.
at 13:04 on November 7th, 2009
I don't think that Malcolm X ever advocated bisexuality or homosexuality as a Muslim. Both are taboo for Muslims.
To say that Malcolm X was an LGBT leader is not correct. He was bisexual apparently before he became a Muslim Civil Rights leader.
at 00:27 on November 8th, 2009
When you are "young", "healthy" and "curious" all kinds of possibilities unfold. Especially if you go to a university. Exploration, sexually, in no way can define who you will be as one "matures" into adulthood.
I have seen my own children explore many paths of interest, dress bizarre and even stick objects into them that I can only say pissed me off at the time.
But overtime as they found their own identity and interests they have become passionate artists and successful productive members of the societies in which they presently live in.
I was in university during Malcom X era and remember clearly his controversial but nevertheless important message for "African-American" "Black-American" at the time, points of self-respect and in the words of the present American President: "Yes (we) You Can".
at 06:26 on November 8th, 2009
Maybe he should have been called Malcolm XX?
at 07:13 on November 8th, 2009
Malcolm XXX ?
at 08:40 on November 8th, 2009
I am enjoying this is very much. I actually have a smile on my face.
at 18:56 on January 10th, 2010
This article about Malcom X was not surprising. He admitted that he had sunk to the bottom of humanity's barrel. Never-the-less, only Malcolm knew whether he was bisexual or not. I wonder if he told any of these second guessers his sexual preferences. If someone drinks alcoholic beverages every now and then, that does not made them an alcoholic. A person is an alcoholic if he/she admits to being an alcoholic. You just can't label someone an alcoholic if they do not acknowledge it. I don't recall reading anywhere where Malcolm labeled himself bisexual. No one has the right to second guess anyone unless the anyone has made known what is being alleged..