Convicted transit policeman set free

by YankeeJim | June 13, 2011 at 03:14 am
134 views | 2 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

Fruitvalley Station

Fruitvalley Station

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

I know Oakland California and it is one of the most dangerous cities in the nation. It is full of criminals living among a community of poor people without much hope of improvement. Celebrity Mayors have come and gone, and the place remains “dangerous Oakland.”

The police, including the transit police are on edge. They are outnumbered by vicious criminals living openly in the neighborhoods and riding the transit from Oakland to San Francisco passing through “good” and “bad” neighborhoods.

At night, it is especially precarious. All kinds of people use the transit to go out on the town and have a good time. Often, hoodlums gang together on trains and are aggressive in their behavior.

On one evening, the aggression erupted into a fight among gang members. That required police intervention. A transit cop panicked in the process. He pulled his gun instead of a Taser. He shot and killed an unarmed person.

"I shot a man," he said. "I killed a man. It should not have happened," said Johannes Mehserle. What is next for him now that he is an xcon?

 


“Former transit cop convicted in California subway shooting goes free

By the CNN Wire Staff

June 13, 2011 5:51 a.m. EDT

Los Angeles (CNN) -- A former transit police officer convicted last year in the shooting death of an unarmed man on an Oakland, California, train platform was freed from prison early Monday morning, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said.

"He was released at 12:01 a.m.," said spokesman Steve Whitmore.

Johannes Mehserle was sentenced to two years in prison for the involuntary manslaughter conviction, but California law gave him one day of good conduct credit for each of the 365 days he served behind bars, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Perry said in a court order he signed last week.

Mehserle has been behind bars since a Los Angeles jury found him guilty on July 8, 2010.

Mehserle, a Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer when the shooting occurred, said at the trial that he intended to draw and fire his Taser rather than his gun when he fatally wounded 22-year-old Oscar Grant on New Year's Day 2009.

Violent protests erupted in Oakland last November when Perry sentenced Mehserle to just two years in prison, which meant he could be released after another seven months.

At least 150 people were arrested during the protests, which Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts described at the time as "tearing up the city."

Grant's mother, Wanda Johnson, had asked the judge to sentence Mehserle to the maximum 14 years in prison. She and four other family members who spoke at the sentencing hearing last year called him "a murderer."

The jury acquitted him of the more serious charges of second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.

Although his defense attorney argued for probation, Mehserle told Perry before sentencing that he would be willing to go to prison if the sentence made his city and family safer.

"I shot a man," he said. "I killed a man. It should not have happened."

A conviction for involuntary manslaughter can carry a sentence of four years, but the judge had the option of adding an "enhancement" that could have made the sentence 14 years because a firearm was used in commission of a crime.”

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
2
Karen Hatter

In a true balance of things, his life should be as difficult as it can be.

He got away with murder when he was given that light sentence. He shot an unarmed Oscar Grant in the back while he was lying on the ground on his stomach in the subway. The man was not a threat.

Mehserle's beyond lame excuse that he was reaching for his taser and couldn't tell his taser weapon from his gun raises a number of questions, number one being, why in the hell is it he, as a trained officer, did NOT know the difference?

   

 

0
The 1

From these photos of a taser gun (below), and in the heat of the moment, which I also have observed police in action, I can see why this type of 'mistake' could possibly have happened. Although if the suspect was already subdued and on his stomach, this type of 'mistake' could become criminal in nature., which apparently it did.

Most police are good guys, many are veterans, but because of the type of training they are receiving, can make these type of mistakes when they believe injury, life or death can be on the line.

As for these new taser weapon technologies, I personally don't like the rules and restrictions being used concerning these new weapons technologies; this would also include direct energy weapons technologies.

http://nugun.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/taser2.png?w=470

http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee248/msanto/Tech/Taser.jpg?t=1266363672

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ4LUDsPFLsKxTQ9lh38o9JTKv2XmRZUM7tSKAEwxlQN7bsZuyLFg&t=1

0
Karen Hatter

1, I have seen police in action as well and often, when young people and minorities are involved, for some reason, these 'trained professionals' act as if they've never had any type of training.

Nearly all deaths of persons not police, when shot BY police, mostly likely can and will be called justifiable homicide because the only burden of responsibility for any death caused by police is the unknown thoughts housed in any law enforcement officers' mind, as in, he felt his life OR his partner's life was/were in danger. That defense is never allowed to be used by any citizen that may find some policeman pointing a gun at him or her. 

Early one Sunday morning in West Philadelphia, a neighbor of mine had some form of mental breakdown and ran out of the house with a kitchen butter knife dressed only in his drawers.

As those of us on the block heard the commotion, we all arrived outside just as the police arrived. The police surrounded the man. The neighbors began pleading with the police not to shoot the man, explaining he had mental issues.

The street where the man and police were positioned ran perpendicular to a smaller adjacent one way street.

The police on the scene, about 6 of them, were talking to the man, telling him to lower the knife. Most had re-holstered their weapons. As the man was lowering the knife, a late arriving cop screeched to a halt on the adjacent street, leaping out of the car, running with his gun drawn. 

As the cops already there looked on, the late cop ran straight up to the man and shot him dead. Shortly after the shooting, after the body was removed, street cleaners came and washed the blood away. There was no investigation of my neighbor's murder.    

This type of action, more often than not, always results in leniency for any members of law enforcement involved in killing a civilian. The excuse is always the tenseness of the circumstances etc.

That's where the training is supposed to kick in so they do not respond in the way most 'regular' people feeling threatened might.

In addition to the Blue Line, where police usually keep each others' secrets and not 'rat' on a fellow officer, there is also fear within the legal system that if police are prosecuted for wrong doing, they will no longer do the job they are hired to do.

In Philadelphia, for decades, a group of crooked police, turned in cookie cutter police reports, same story, same bogus evidence over and over, framing scores of innocent people. In nearly all of the cases, the reluctance of the district attorney's office to pursue any complaint or look into the matter was standard operating procedure.

Finally, after decades and a change of administration, scores of individuals were released after losing years from their lives because of the accepted infallibility or alleged to be 'honest' mistake(s) made by those in law enforcement.

I've watched testimony offered by Asian Americans on CSPAN regarding alleged police misconduct and insensitivity.

An elderly Asian man had been killed outside his home due to confused events caused by a language barrier. After the elderly man was killed, his home was searched, thoroughly ransacked is more like it, looking for shurikins (throwing stars), nunchukas etc., to justify the police's assertion that they feared for their lives because all Asians know Kung Fu. No weapons of any kind were found.

Whether there are only a few bad apples or not, with these individuals with such life and death decisions in their hands in any given situation, a few is too many.


0
The 1

Your examples above are well received Karen, and actually what I was suggesting by the type of training they are receiving. What I was saying is that there is a specific flaw in this training that creates this environment for abuses to happen. Things can easily get out of control in that heat of the moment..Plus the added factors you mention of 'blue code of silence' and 'justice system tolerance' of abuses by the law enforcement community. Not to mention the racial profiling thats decades old. Sorry for any misunderstanding I caused. 1

0
Karen Hatter

No, 1, we had no real misunderstanding of significance. 

I offered only 3 anecdotes of maybe a dozen of which I am personally aware and on this we BOTH agree, something needs to be done about that TYPE of training being given to the individuals that are sent out into any and all of our communities. 

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

liamssoft
First Flagged at 3:37 AM, Jun 13, 2011 by liamssoft
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from