NP Rank:
Cop Punches Woman: Seattle Officer Ian Walsh Punches Girl (Video)
A Cop Punches a Woman in the Face Over Jaywalking in Seattle: Investigation Ordered
A police officer named by the Seattle Times as Officer Ian P. Walsh was caught on video punching Angel L. Rosenthal, a 17-year-old woman, in the face near Franklin High School in Seattle on Monday June 14.
He has now been taken off patrol duty and placed in a training unit to review police tactics.
According to the Seattle Police Website, Officer Walsh saw a male pedestrian jaywalk across Martin Luther King Jr. Way South and he stopped him. Then while he was talking to this male, he saw four females jaywalk at the same location as the first pedestrian. When the officer asked the females to come over to his car, they were 'verbally antagonistic' towards the police officer and one female started to walk away.
When the officer asked her to come back she did not, so he went to get her to bring her back to the car. He could not get her to put her hands on the car as she kept breaking free of his grip. He then tried to handcuff her, and that is when her friend intervened and put her hands on the officer's arm. According to the officer he thought that meant she was going to help her friend escape, so he pushed her back and when she came at him that is when he punched her. Both women were arrested, and the police report says no one was injured as a result of the incident.
The Times identifies the two women as Angel L. Rosenthal and Marilyn Ellen Levias.
On Monday night a press conference was held where Acting Deputy Chief Nick Metz said the officer acted appropriately; on Tuesday morning he expressed concern over how Walsh had acted.
A review of the situation has been ordered.
"You obviously have to take into context everything that occurred from the point that the officer did make contact with the individuals until the situation ended," said Deputy Chief Nick Metz to King 5 News.
Metz noted there were some "concerns about the tactics the officer used."
"He did nothing wrong," police union president Rich O'Neill said, according to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. "If anything, I think he maybe waited a little too long to engage in force because I think he was trying to defuse the situation."
But "it was obvious from the audio anyway of the two individuals that they were not going to be calmed down."
Watch the Incident Caught on Video (Warning Some Graphic Language Used)
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada
Recommendations (14)
-
everchanging
Phoenix, Arizona, United States -
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
NowPublic Staff
Vancouver, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (51)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Summerstar (not verified)at 08:25 on June 16th, 2010
An officer in a situation alone which is clearly not under control has someone step up and try to help the suspect get free. Now the officer has to deal with 2 immediate threats. Remember there is no way to tell the level of those threats at the time but he can't deal with 2 at the same time so what should you do? Immobolize one of the threats. Now if I am correct once you touch someone without their permission it is consider battery. So the 2nd suspect agressivly approached the officer and her actions were agressive as well. The officer defended himself by immobolizing her with a non leathel method. But what is going to happen is this will be turned into a race issue. SPD will be criticized again and no one will look at the facts. None of the suspects took direction or commands from the officer so using his "inside voice" would have fallen on deaf ears. I feel his actions were appropriate for the situation.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
VIQTCG (not verified)at 07:15 on June 17th, 2010
Well lets hope Officer Walsh does not lose his job! The officer clearly had to demonstrate how serious he would be to defend his own life. A crack to the jaw? good job. That let everybody know he was going to look after himself. He could easily have been set upon by a much larger group of people on MLK.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Mary Ricks (not verified)at 08:33 on June 16th, 2010
Officer Walsh should not be allowed to serve the public. the man has a anger problem and should not be allowed to carry a gun. He should be investigated even in his personal life, because to punch that girl like that he probably beats his wife or whatever woman he has in his life. the man has no respect for women or maybe he just hates blacks.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Romelo (not verified)at 09:04 on June 16th, 2010
Wasnt a black or white thing. You see someone resist and run to jump in on any color officer and see what happens. You are one of the race runner's I am pertaining to. You wouldnt do it the same as she shouldnt have. She is lucky to only lose her pride and not her life. You believe the officer was wrong then you try it champ! Pretty sure you were raised on common sense yourself, dont stop using it now!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Zak koplo (not verified)at 10:36 on June 20th, 2010
Well Mary, apparently you didn't watch the same video I did. That girl would not comply with the police officer when he demanded her to do so, and he was out-numbered. I'll go out on a limb and say that your black? And you behave and talk like that trashy girl does? Now before you get all up in arms and play the race card further. Just remeber that you made the same kind of malicous assumptions about that officer and how he behaves in his personal life.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Shelley84 (not verified)at 21:31 on June 28th, 2010
He should not lose his job. The idiots should have respected authority and acted like humans instead of animals. So does that mean that the girls in the video don't like whites or men? Did they act like animals because they are racists or just idiots??? I think he did a good job considering all the idiots running their filthy mouths around him. TRASH!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Are you serious? (not verified)at 08:43 on June 16th, 2010
Any officer in that situation would have and should have done the same thing. When officer safety is on the line, it doesn't matter if it's a male or female, the bottom line is that its a threat, and you are taught to take out that threat. If it was me, I would have tazed her and ended the situation sooner.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Romelo (not verified)at 08:59 on June 16th, 2010
Coming from an african american, I will say that both females were in the wrong for resistance. Many will make this out to be a race issue in the long run and I hate that our people always tend to do just that when there is an open door such as this case. That officer was doing his job, and to be honest, they were lucky as hell that is all that happened. And for the record I am not an officer. He was simply protecting himself period. She will be lucky if there isn't an assualt on an officer charge slapped on her along with resisting. Common sense should tell folks, when they see a situation as this to point blank mind their business. Instead of anger, the female suspects are lucky to have life today. Besides, I think she will recover from that defensive punch alot easier than getting a taste of a tasing. Good job to the officer in my book, because that same officer could be the one to save your life one day genuis!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Reality Observer (not verified)at 08:59 on June 16th, 2010
An officer of the law must be able to evaluate a situation and then use a strategy that will lead to a socially acceptable end. This cop should 1) recognize the youthfulness of the group and 2) overcome his immature response of "I'm the big kid - mind me" and reduce the threat level that emanates from him. These kids needed to be talked to and not assaulted with words and fists.Were they endangering themselves or the public? Office Walsh needs to be re-evaluated by the psychologists before he goes back to the streets.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Bill Flynn (not verified)at 20:49 on June 16th, 2010
You are an idiot!! Socially Acceptable!!!! Would have been for the 2 suspects to have just Obeyed the officer's request!!! Immature response, First off he is an adult they should just listened! Second we dont know what happened before suspect #1 started resisting, now do we? Yes they were endangering themselves and the public! Here is how, jaywalking happens to be a problem in this area, Jaywalking in it self is a risk. And don't think for a minute that the local high schoolers didn't know that the Police had been working this area. As far as Officer Walsh needing to be re-evaluated. Once agian all we see and hear is suspect #1 resisting and then assulting a officer! Then suspect #2 (I have a lot of respect for the young man that tried to stop #2 ) She thanks to the video should be charged with assault just to start. This all could have been avoided! How you ask? Don't break the law! That is the long and the short of it!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Waltee (not verified)at 15:58 on June 22nd, 2010
I Agree, It is obvious that these girls are not criminal minded and i will bet my last dollar before officer friendly here physically abused them and hauled them off to the slammer like career criminals for jay walking , they had never even seen the inside of a cell. I believe he should have focused on one situation at a time instead of trying to be super cop and address two situations at one time. Teens have the tendency to rebel and be stubborn anyway and thats why cops who are in schools are taught to deal with them differently than they would an adult who has a better understanding of the real world. teens are not mature adults and if this officer had of hit my daughter who is 16 yrs of age I would not rest until he got repremended. Yes the girls were wrong but lets face the truth this cops life never appeared to be in any mortal danger. So even if he felt that it was " Oh yeah let me punch this girl in the face it's procedure", doesn't seem to be the best or only option. He could have used the time he spent struggling with the GIRLS calling back up and retaining them until other cops arrived but oh yeah this guy is super cop !!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
no name (not verified)at 09:01 on June 16th, 2010
The race card will probably be pulled in this situation. The young woman was in the wrong, by approaching and placing her hands on the police officer she posed as a potential threat. In any normal situation, if a person walks up on you, invades your personal space, places their hands on you and then makes motions as if they were going to come back at you, you will defend yourself. 17 years old or not. These days some young adults dont have respect, and have the notion of invincibility. All of the facts need to be placed out there before judgements are made/ and race cards are pulled. She almost looked as if she would have struck him if he hadnt struck her first. SHE DID PLACE HER HANDS ON HIM FIRST. However, he should have not tried to deal with them alone. He should have called or attempted to call for a woman police officer. He looked as if he was a little over his head in this one. if she was warned to step off or back. how else would you get someone off of you? (in this situation) Punching, NO. if he had pulled his gun, definately NO. So what ?? pepper spray? maybe.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
K RAMBO (not verified)at 09:42 on June 16th, 2010
The cop was out of order, if he was too pussy to handle the situation, he should have called for backup. He attacked defenceless women, he is a trained officer, he cannot go unleashing his anger on the public, he should be properly investigated and treated for his mental condition. He has forgotten that the state police has a poor record of arresting real criminals, jay walking is not a criminal offence. He should be suspended pending an investigation, if he has a lot of anger, it can be relieved in jail, when he meets people his size, who will bend him over like a bitch. Shame on him.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Craig livingstone (not verified)at 10:03 on June 16th, 2010
Do NOT lay hands on the Police! Shoot her mext time. Stupid cow.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Noton Urlife (not verified)at 10:08 on June 16th, 2010
I do not feel this officer is qualified. If he can't drop a girl with one punch, how did he ever pass the strength and agility testing? Also, why didn't just mace the two of them? I mean ... damn ... with mouths like that, I can't figure out how they still have teeth.On a more serious note, where the hell was this officer's backup? Looked like at least two individuals needed to be arrested for obstruction in addition to the girl that was resisting arrest. You would think it would be a requirement that every school teach children about the rights of police officers (yes, Mildred, police have rights too) and a citizens duty to comply with lawful orders issued by police.
at 10:36 on June 16th, 2010
If these police have tasers, this officer should be commended for pulling one out. Had these been males of any colour nobody would think twice about that punch. That girl shoved him back about three feet before he punched her, interfering with his attempt to handcuff her struggling friend. These girls were clearly behaving very badly and if the cop had been a woman, again we would not question the action. The fracas over his actions here is entirely born of the long-standing ethic of men not being allowed to hit women. In this case it was not a man and woman, but an officer arresting a suspect who is resisting with violence.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
hayley (not verified)at 11:06 on June 21st, 2010
I can agree with this to an extent. It's true that gender roles have clearly put a precedent on the situation. If it was a man who the cop had hit, there would probably be less of a frenzy. However, I think we need to take several things into account:1. The cop was clearly hitting out of anger, and not civil responsibility. You can see from his movements that it was in no way controlled or thought out. While, yes, force may have been necessary, I think he could have easily found a more responsible way of using it.2. These girls were clearly not as strong as him, and he is very lucky he hadn't injured them more severely.3. While we can easily see the gender standard, and even perhaps a racial standard, for some, what people aren't addressing is the class standard between cop and citizen. The fact of the matter is that cops have, in general, had a long history of power abuse and unsatisfactory behavior. They are humans like the rest of us, and we should not assume that because they wear a badge they are ultimately right. If the situation was that there were two white men in the street who became engaged in an argument, and a friend attempted to help assist one of them, what would happen if the other man decided that the only way to diffuse the situation was to assault him? The cops would be called, and they would be arrested or otherwise disciplined. Physical force of a violent nature should never be the go-to answer to any situation. Although force may be needed, I think the punch itself was wholly unnecessary and inappropriate. So you're right: this is a case of an officer arresting a resisting suspect. I think it should be looked at from this perspective, and I still think it's wrong. Human culture has used physical force and violence as a means of peace since the beginnings of society, and I think we should be doing what we can to break the trend as much as it is reasonable to. Of course force will still be necessary in many cases, but I do believe that we often use it in excess. This is only one of the many examples of it.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Kevin M (not verified)at 10:45 on June 16th, 2010
These woman are out of conmtrol. They deserved everything that happened to them.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
jdm (not verified)at 11:23 on June 16th, 2010
I agree, Little girls thinking their untouchable, with their big attitude. Not so big now huh.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Uncommon Sense (not verified)at 13:02 on June 16th, 2010
The only problem with the officer was his lack of skill in defensive tactics and arrest techniques. Needs to be retrained in control techniques. If someone is resisting officer must escalate the force level to control said resisting. The overhand right was OK but should of followed up immedaitely with a take down technique, then take down and control the other suspect. He spent too much time in making arrest.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Margaret K (not verified)at 15:01 on June 16th, 2010
The officer is not at fault, this could very easily have turned into a mob situation. These two women were out of control, you do not put your hands on or act aggresively towards another person, especially a law enforcement officer. The woman wearing pink struck out first and was dealt with accordingly, besides the fact that she is actually larger than the officer she looks like she survived the ordeal.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
tans-parere (not verified)at 15:06 on June 16th, 2010
It's a set up. Watch the vid and you can see her playing to the camera. All her moves are to get her face towards the lens. Can you say "acting".!!!Police have a tough enough job with out poser's going for a youtube moment.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
JHB (not verified)at 15:55 on June 16th, 2010
If that officer cannot quickly bring a wee 17 year old girl under control quickly, he should not be in uniform, period. He had the advantage of weight, training and (supposedly) superior experience. Letting that situation get away from him so easily is just pathetic. I would say that some of his academy instructors should be getting a reprimand as well.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
John K. Patterson (not verified)at 22:33 on June 17th, 2010
Wee girl? That overfed animal in pink is larger than the officer, painfully obvious actually.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
seattlehomegrown (not verified)at 17:04 on June 16th, 2010
A Cop Punches a Woman in the Face Over Jaywalking in Seattle: Investigation OrderedThe most ridiculous subtitle ever. Clearly there is more to the story and the media needs to do there job, just as a teacher would, and present unbiased news to the people and let them decide for themselves. These women were ganging up on the officer and coming from the wife of an officer I would want my husband to do what it takes within reason to protect himself. I don't care if they are only 17, there are 2 of them and one of him. His actions? Justified..
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Shawtyat 18:03 on June 16th, 2010
why does everyone call these girls "women?" She was 17! That's a teen, not a woman. The officer punched a teen in the face.
Does that make the situation any clearer? jeez
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Rob111 (not verified)at 03:13 on June 17th, 2010
I hope next time you are being robbed, the office stops and says, "how old are you ms. suspect." How in the hell is this officer going to know that she is 17. How do we know that her birth day isn't the next day. All of a sudden "poof" your 18 and it's not ok to attack an office???? but when your 17, it is???? The "WOMEN" got what they asked for.... - Jay walking, that's how dogs get killed !!!! ps.- you must be a democrat...
- Sign In or Join to post comments
rob111 (not verified)at 03:14 on June 17th, 2010
I hope next time you are being robbed, the office stops and says, "how old are you ms. suspect." How in the hell is this officer going to know that she is 17. How do we know that her birth day isn't the next day. All of a sudden "poof" your 18 and it's not ok to attack an office???? but when your 17, it is???? The "WOMEN" got what they asked for.... - Jay walking, that's how dogs get killed !!!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
rob111 (not verified)at 03:16 on June 17th, 2010
I hope next time you are being robbed, the office stops and says, "how old are you ms. suspect." How in the hell is this officer going to know that she is 17. How do we know that her birth day isn't the next day. All of a sudden "poof" your 18 and it's not ok to attack an office???? but when your 17, it is???? The "WOMEN" got what they asked for.... - Jay walking, that's how dogs get killed !!!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
rob111 (not verified)at 03:17 on June 17th, 2010
I hope next time you are being robbed, the office stops and says, "how old are you ms. suspect." How in the hell is this officer going to know that she is 17. How do we know that her birth day isn't the next day. All of a sudden "poof" your 18 and it's not ok to attack an office???? but when your 17, it is???? The "WOMEN" got what they asked for.... - Jay walking, that's how dogs get killed !!!!