Could Ron Paul upset the establishment and actually win in Iowa?

by Worldviewtonight | December 21, 2011 at 06:59 am
269 views | 2 Recommendations | 7 comments

Texas Rep. Ron Paul & libertarian is renowned for his millions dollar Money Bomb’s, a fanatical support base and a reputation as the most consistent fiscal conservative over the years. Paul’s front runner status is starting to cause many within the Republican Party establishment to worry, that he may in fact win the Iowa caucus.   

Paul is a libertarian leaning politician with libertarianism being a political philosophy based on the minimisation of coercion, with government limited fairly strictly to the prevention of force and fraud. Both prostitution and insider trading would be legal in a libertarian society.

Many pundits and establishment figures were quick to dismiss Paul’s success in recent weeks however, Paul received 21.7% of potential caucusgoers, according to an average of three recent polls compiled by the website Real Clear Politics. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney trails him slightly with 20.3% and former speaker Newt Gingrich comes in third with 15.7%. Despite this proven success, however, the mainstream media and GOP establishment continue to dismiss any chance of Paul capturing the nomination and the legitimacy of his campaign. 

Paul makes the Republican establishment nervous because his support base is his alone, and is not getting any assistance from the party. Many accept that beyond his core support, there is little evidence that other Republicans want Paul.

It is believed Republicans are now preparing a newsletter campaign and will resort to other options in an attempt to discredit the congressman at every opportunity. While the congressman from Texas has some of the same goals as his fellow Republican frontrunner, including the abolishment of several governmental programs, it looks as though the candidate’s libertarian leanings has enough of the establishment scared that his presidential promises could become a reality.

Foreign policy is one area where Paul is finding troubled waters with his fellow Republicans, such as Rep. Michele Bachmann, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania.

All three criticised Paul's comments during the Fox News debate last week in which he said he feared the United States would overreact to "war propaganda" about Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon and risk getting into another "useless war."

"There is no evidence that (Iran)" has a nuclear weapon, he said. "And it would make more sense,  if we lived through the Cold War, which we did, with 30,000 missiles pointed at us, we ought to really sit back and think and not jump the gun and believe that we are going to be attacked." That's unacceptable, Perry said: "We cannot have a president of the United States that basically is so hands-off to a country like Iran that they say, 'It's not our business, we're not going to get involved.' It is our business." Bachmann said Paul "would have our nation ignore clear unmistakable warning signs of another brutal dictator who would want to wipe Israel and the rest of us off the face of the map."

This is Ron Paul’s third run for president having previously ran in 1988 as the Libertarian Party’s nominee and again in 2008 seeking the Republican nomination. The GOP face the very real possibility of Paul winning in Iowa. He’s got both the poll lead and the ground organisation with enthusiastic supporters that could to produce results on caucus night.  

If Paul win’s in Iowa it could have a major impact in the in New Hampshire primary as candidates doing well in Iowa traditionally receive a boost in support in the Granite State. The Ron Paul rise is working to Mitt Romney’s advantage and hurting Gingrich. The more conservative element of the Republican Party wanted an alternative to Romney however, with Romney and Paul possessing the organisation and finance to mount a negative campaign against Gingrich, a third place finish for the former speaker is now looking a good result in the first in the nation caucus come January 3. Don’t bet against Paul turning the GOP race into a long drawn out affair and turning many a pundits predictions on their heads.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
YankeeJim

Ron Paul is the latest of Republican - Libertarian distractions. He is a self-absorbed individual and his ideas are mostly bankrupt. American voters need to move on and the Republican Party should focus on understanding the needs of America in a global context. Get serious.

3
The 1

I think Ron Paul would make an excellent candidate against Obama..  Republicans should vote Ron Paul ! 

0
YankeeJim

If I were a Republican 20 years ago, I may have gone for Paul. Now, Paul's time is past. The biggest hang up is that he is so independent that I don't think he fits in a collaborative government. 

Good to hear from The 1.

0
LogicNonLogic

I've never voted for Paul before personally. But at present Paul is the ONLY candidate that shows common sense and the only one who does not have party voices whispering in his ear telling him what to say and do (and then following the voices) like ALL the other Candidates. Oviously the Republicans of the Party are Very Scared of him.... All going after him in a absolute nonsense attack of fear mongering. The one voice in the Republican party that previously had a chance of getting my vote just lost it through his recent Ron Paul / Iran attack. Up until today I never thought Ron Paul had a literal chance in Christian Hell in his run for president, and now I not only think he has a chance, He has my support and will most likely get my vote if it goes that far!  

3
Needs2Win

The only candidate and hope for an actual President is Ron Paul.  We need some old-school wisdom in our country. He's not a man who stands up and makes promises about anything... he simply states what he believes.  His behavior is consistent with his character. His character is consistent with his beliefs.  No grandstanding, no haughtiness, and zero arrogance in him.  I think, he's actually scared for America, and it's the only reason he's willing to put himself in this position.  There are politicians who are in the game to further their agenda, and there is Ron Paul... A man whose agenda has been simply to support the constitution, give freedom back to the people, while helping Americans to help themselves.All I've heard in the last 20 years of politics is "I promise to do this..." "I promise that..." and none of it is ever true. We don't need promises. We don't need change. We don't need stimulus packages. We don't need handouts. We need to care again, to believe again, and to love again. The hate we facilitate is embedded into our self-absorbed consciences and in our sense of entitlement.Big money, "men behind the curtain" people own Washington DC.  We work, to pay them to keep us slaves. It's not about hard work in this country anymore, not about a handshake or being honest... it's about personal gain at any cost or expense. We are all working to pay international big-wigs off. Your salary is dirt to them. Money is dirt to them, and so are you.I have this feeling that this is the last chance we're going to have as a country to stave off disaster in its all-encompassing, grinding destruction.Vote Ron Paul in 2012, or get ready for marshal law and a police state. Don't do it for America, don't do it for freedom... do it for yourself... because that's what we do best.

0
YankeeJim

Ron Paul's attraction wasn't "old school," it was common sense to the nth degree. That is still an attractive characteristic and he is right where he should be in Congress.

Make it work.


1
Scrivener

Ron Paul is spot-on when it comes to civil liberties and costly foreign entanglements -- but take away his rhetoric on those key issues and he's a convenient pawn for corporate interests who would benefit from his disdain for any federal regulation, even if the regulations curb environmental pollution and protect consumers from fraud and financial chicanery.

If Huntsman were really smart, he'd co-opt Paul on the civil liberties and foreign affairs fronts, declare his opposition to American adventurism abroad, condemn the nullification of Americans' constitutional rights and pledge to curb Wall Street and the banksters.

But I don't know that Huntsman has it in him to be so bold.

My bet is that David Patraeus (and the power elite) will throw Obama a huge curve by abruptly resigning from the CIA and making known his amenability to a presidential draft movement.  Just watch and see...

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from