mrreynolds, I think your story has potential but needs some improvement. I wasn't sure what was newsworthy in this story. We are a news site, not really a place where you can air personal complaints, sorry.
DaProcess Of A Federal Investigation
I am the victim of a surveillance technology commonly referred to as "Synthetic Telepathy". You can review information about the existence & usage of such technology from my website link below. This was my original complaint.
I had reason to believe that the U.S. Marshals Service might be responsible for the "illegal electronic surveillance" which remains an "allegation" at this time. So I contacted the U.S. Marshals Service internal affairs division then Congress as directed by federal statute:
Title 18> Part I> Chapter I> § 4 [LINK]
§ 4. Misprision of felony
I was told in writing by the Chief of the U.S. Marshals Service internal affairs division that there would be a "private" investigation with an "undisclosed" outcome, "obstruction of justice". While Congress was told in writing by the U.S. Marshals Service Congressional affairs division that no such investigation "ever existed" a "false statement". Although I have the conflicting documents with both of their signatures on official agency letterhead. You can't get a gun to smoke anymore than that.
This is what's known as a contradiction commonly referred to as a lie. I am currently pursuing an investigation of the written contradictions of which I have established my "burden of proof" with the documented evidence. One of us is lying I want a federal grand jury to decide but the USDoJ does not respect that they are entitled to a speedy trial. It's been four years, either way one of us has violated federal statute:
Title 18 > Part I > Chapter 47 > § 1001 [LINK]
§ 1001. Statements or entries generally.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion you don't have to believe me personally but you cannot deny that which is in writing with signature affixed. So if my complaint is a "fabrication" why are "they lying" in such an "egregious" manner? Why does the U.S. Department of Justice refuse to investigate & then make a determination based upon federal statute of law instead of contributing to the "malfeasance"?
You can review all of my supporting documents at my website located at www.daprocess.com