Dealing with Savages

by joellerose | July 19, 2008 at 06:22 am | 1096 views | 57 comments | 23 recommendations

Opinion. At a time when history is hardly being taught anymore, it must be hard for our young people to understand who the good guys are in the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis in what was called Palestine. In a land where both Jews and Arabs have dwelt and fought one another for ages, it was Solomon-like for the United Nations to divide the land between them in 1947 – yes, 1947, more than 60 years ago. Neither the Arabs in surrounding countries nor the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians would accept that decision, and the Palestinians moved out, confident that they could soon move back and take over all the land; while Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Yemen attacked the Israelis. Four times since 1948 the Arab countries have attacked Israel with the objective of exterminating every Jew who lived there. The result of these wars was defeat and humiliation for the Arabs and more-defensible borders for the Israelis.

Egypt signed a peace agreement with Israel (for which Anwar Sadat was assassinated by Islamic fundamentalists), and, over the years, many times other countries, mostly the U.S.A., have tried to broker a peace agreement between the Israelis and the Palestinians. The last, significant negotiation, called the Oslo Accords, was brokered between President Clinton, the Palestinian leader, PLO Chairman Yasir Arafat, and the Israeli Premier,Yitzhak Rabin. Many Israelis objected to the terms of this agreement and replaced Rabin, while the Palestinians reacted by launching the “Intifada”, a never-ending state of terrorism against the Israelis, and the Oslo Accords came to naught.

Due to the rampant anti-semitism that exists in much of the world, Israel has often been portrayed as the monster in the conflict. When Hezbollah attacked Israel in the summer of 2006, both the Associated Press and Reuters were caught doctoring photographs and filing false reports (remember Cana) that condemned Israel unfairly. Now today, eight years later, we finally get the truth about another, widely-circulated false report:

Faux news

July 19, 2008 The Providence Journal

The Sept. 30, 2000, video of a 12-year-old Palestinian boy, Muhammed al-Dura, caught in a crossfire on the West Bank riveted the world. The voiceover said the boy had been deliberately targeted by the Israeli military. The Arab world responded vehemently. The incident still reverberates as a symbol of Israeli brutality and Palestinian victimization.

But it never happened. Shortly after the original broadcast, its veracity was questioned in many quarters. Evidence emerged that Israeli soldiers could not have shot the boy but that Palestinian fighters could have.

French media watchdog Philippe Karsenty accused Charles Enderlin, who as Mideast bureau chief for the official French TV network France2 had done the broadcast’s voiceover, and his Palestinian cameraman, of creating a hoax. Mr. Enderlin sued Mr. Karsenty for defamation.

At trial, evidence of a hoax was abundant if not conclusive. A stock film clip of an Israeli soldier shooting had been spliced into the broadcast video. Mr. Enderlin, who was not present, relied on his cameraman’s word that the child had been killed.

Frames edited out of the video showed the boy alive after the shooting stopped. France2 initially refused to hand over minutes of relevant video footage. When it was finally released, it showed Palestinians practicing for a range of hoaxes, including scenes of “wounded” Palestinians being rushed to ambulances (and then emerging with smiles on their faces).

Now a verdict exonerating Mr. Karsenty has been delivered by a French judge, Mme. Laurence Trébucq. Mr. Karsenty’s acquittal amounts to the disgrace of his accuser, and shines a much-needed spotlight on the “fauxtography” that sometimes masquerades as television news in the Middle East.

The verdict has been greeted largely with silence not only by the French media but throughout Europe, the Mideast (except Israel), and to an extent even in the United States. It is not beside the point that exonerations (seven so far) in the trial of eight U.S. Marines in the Haditha case have similarly attracted little attention, despite blanket coverage in the aftermath of charges of a massacre in Iraq in 2005.

The Palestinian cameraman who shot the al-Dura footage, Talal abu-Rahmah, once bragged that “I went into journalism to carry on the fight for my people.” Objectivity is not always the lodestar of journalism as practiced in the Muslim world, but it should be for Western media. The role of faux news in covering the Mideast deserves more scrutiny.

recommend Add a comment
0
generaldecay

Can I clarify here if you are referring to Arabic people as savages? If so, may I also ask how such an assertion sits with other members of NP?

0
Paschen

Not well at all would be my anther to your question generaldecay! I already commented on this piece!

0
generaldecay

It's not a opinion I share myself, although joellerose has clarified his intentions with the title below.

0
joellerose

Islamic terrorists who cut off peoples' heads and set off bombs using their own babies to carry them are savages.

0
generaldecay

Ok, if that's the case, I want to point out that your piece reads to me that you're calling all Arabic people savages. That is what I read from it, and I imagine that other people will too. This was as much a 'heads-up' about that as anything else.

0
joellerose

President Bush has gone to great lengths to remind Americans who are very angry about 9/11 that most Muslims are peaceful people who want the same future for their children as do we, and the President has also gone to great lengths to protect the rights and persons of the Muslim religion who are U.S. citizens.  Even so, some people seem to go to great lengths to avoid the obvious truth that almost all terrorist acts committed in the world today are by Muslims against non-Muslims and by Muslims against Muslims.

0
generaldecay

That's not what I was saying. My point was that, from your title, it looks like you are saying that all Arabic people are savages. By savages, you mean terrorists, you've said.

Saying that all terrorists are, by and large, muslims is very different to saying that all muslims are, by and large, terrorists. It is the latter, not the former, that I read from your title.

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:33 on July 19th, 2008

joellerose, always an interesting opinion and read. Thanks for posting!

0
Paschen

I do agree that faux news should not be at all, especially in the Western Countries! Since those are a beacon for democracy and Law. As NP should not publish Faux News either!

Why is it then that you, your self publish faux news?? At least lacking objectivity and balance! That would be my Question!?

0
joellerose

What part of my story is faux news?  That the Israelis were attacked in four wars by the Arabs?  That the Intifada has been taking place?  That the AP and Reuters falsified news reports?  That the whole al-Dura story was false?  What?  Sometimes there is truth, and it is harsh.

0
Paschen

The only one falsifying news here is you your self! You are also Propagating and in-sighting hate and racism! Further you are distorting facts or at least changing the facts by leaving crucial pieces and misleading the reader!

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Paschen, it would be appreciated if you would not "wage an attack" on the author of this story, rather offer constructive criticism on the opinion itself. Thanks!

0
Paschen

Did you read the story as well as the comments?

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Yes Paschen, I have read both the story and the comments.

0
Paschen

All right! Since you flagged it and since you are the NW, maybe you can speak up here and make this a better or at least a less offensive article! Thank you!

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Paschen, any offense lies within the mind of the reader. I was not offended by Joellerose's Opinion. So, for me, there is nothing to offer to "make this a better or at least less offensive article!"

0
Paschen

What you are saying here is a double edge sword! Yes the reader could be offended even though the Author meant none, or the Author could willingly try to offend and the reader fails to be offended and so on! Any how it does no longer matter!

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Paschen, for you, it is a "double edge sword!" I am glad to know however that "... it does no longer matter!" [to you].

0
Paschen

I am absolutely certain, that if this was written by an Arab and a Moslem, something such as this Post, with a title similar yet reversing the issue that no one in the US would cry out!

No, never! Look at the news then, more often then not, when a Moslem dares to say any thing in such a way as here in this post and yet a lot milder then here, America cries murder!

Double standards at best! Should not be especially not with an NW!

0
Rhonda J Mangus

I am glad that you are absolutely certain, Paschen. Nevertheless, any offense or perceived double-standard rests in the mind(s) of the reader(s).  Again, I did not take offense, and certainly did not employ any "double-standard", when I flagged Jellerose's Opinion.

0
joellerose

You keep making this charge, but not citing any facts to support it.  Present an argument with some facts you dispute, and I will deal with it.  The racists are the Islamic terrorists, and civilized people do hate them and rightly so.

René
René
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:08 on July 19th, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
PEP

Here, joellerose, try this as a headline to convey all of what you're doing without posting something that to some obviously appears to be racist:

Fake Video and Savage Acts: Does "Faux" News Fan Middle East Hate and Violence?




0
joellerose

Sometimes a reader will deliberately misinterpret something you have said in order to draw attention away from your main points; it's called "baiting".

0
Paschen

I make you a peace offering and lets start this over! One can not miss read this joellerose!

Just make sure that your title and text reflect your real views. PEP made you a great suggestion there!

0
generaldecay

No baiting here. I was genuinely interested in what you were implying with your title.

0
René

So. Does anyone have anything to say about the 'meat' of this story besides nit-picking about the title? Guess that is NP users way to divert attention from real issues.

0
generaldecay

I object to that Rene. For me, as a NP reader of this story, the title was the main interest to me because of what I interpreted from the title. I do believe that we are allowed to discuss aspects of stories that we want to discuss still?

0
René

Find it interesting that you couldn't get beyond that. And IMHO the title is totally apt, inspite of everybody's objections. It doesn't indicate 'all Arabs', as some people here claim, just the ones who are savage. Are you claiming that none of them are?

0
PEP

Personal opinions aside, I'd just like to see a headline that isn't an opinon in itself, but rather a statement of what's in the presented material. That's what a headline is supposed to do. Oh, well.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

July 19, 2008 at 06:22 am by joellerose, 1096 views, 57 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from