DEBATE: 9/11 World Trade Center Controlled Demolition - Architect Richard Gage vs. Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine

i agree Paschen, this debate is helpful for seeing both sides. Shermer is a prominent establishment supporter of the official 9/11 story and denouncer of 9/11 skeptics, though he claims to be a skeptic himself. Gage is a licensed architect who makes a strong case that the official story about the WTC collapse is impossible, and there is compelling evidence of controlled demolition using explosives and thermate.

The only way the top section will fall strait down without any deflection of its path will be. if there is no resistance under it. The only way the top section will fall down strait to the ground at freefall speed in freefall time is when there is no resistance slowing it down. No crushing tons of solid concrete elevators shafts that first need to crunch and break before it collapses. None of that. As if everything below it was removed to clear its way strait down.  If I would demolish a building like that with explosives. I would not like it to fall over like most buildings do when collapsing naturally, I would rather like it all to land on one neat pile of rubble. I would blow the lower sections first so that the top section can come strait down without resistance or sideways deflections. Let it go the path of gravity and not the path of resistance. The path of resistance is never strait. I must congratulate the explosive experts who manage to let two towers both designed to withstand the crash of big airplanes and the heat of jet fuel to let both successfully come down very neat and precise way. Both in the same style. Both on one neat pile, both in minutes while most other skyscrapers burn for days and still stand or partially fall over. This was very neatly done.

 

How did building 7 crashed down to the ground neatly falling “inward” from the sides starting at the middle line down and end on one neat pile of rubble in its place demolition style, while other buildings fall over or collapse partially if destroyed naturally. Go Google it. “building collapse” and see if you ever see any scenario like that naturally. from hundreds I found none. While the buildings that surrounded building 7 Verizon and post office was undamaged.

 

 It also funny how a simple case of corruption or murder can carry on for years but the 9/11 case was closed quicker that what it was opened.  I wonder why Obama didn’t investigate it. Not enough reason I guess 2,750 people dead, no big issue. Lets not dig up old cows, Lets rather worry about where we put the sodiers we take out of Iraq. And how lay down more plans on Africa’s minerals. Is he another puppet of the powers that drive “US terror” to cover it up?