DEBATE: 9/11 World Trade Center Controlled Demolition - Architect Richard Gage vs. Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine

by Erik Larson | September 23, 2008 at 04:39 pm | 89 views | 2 comments | 5 recommendations

Architect Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine debate what brought down the World Trade Center and other problems with the official explanations for 9/11. Gage lays out the case for controlled demolition and takes no bait from Shermer. Gage also dismisses mini-nukes, DRE- Directed Energy Weapons and "no planes" theories.

DEBATE: Were the World Trade Towers brought down by controlled demolition? Richard Gage,AIA, of AE911Truth.org versus Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine
This debate has already broadcast on September 20, 2008--it is now archived here.
Use Player to Listen >>
Michael ShermerWTC7Richard Gage
Controlled Demolition Debate!
Exciting on-air debate with Richard Gage, AIA, of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth and Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine first broadcast on Oakland's KKGN 960am radio this last Thursday, September 18th. Don't miss this one!!!

mp3 of the Angie Coiro show at Green960.com

recommend Add a comment
Paschen
  • news wrangler
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 17:33 on September 23rd, 2008

Erik Larson, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Erik Larson

i agree Paschen, this debate is helpful for seeing both sides. Shermer is a prominent establishment supporter of the official 9/11 story and denouncer of 9/11 skeptics, though he claims to be a skeptic himself. Gage is a licensed architect who makes a strong case that the official story about the WTC collapse is impossible, and there is compelling evidence of controlled demolition using explosives and thermate.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

September 23, 2008 at 04:39 pm by Erik Larson, 89 views, 2 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from