is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
I would welcome public debate on the possible 'higher' meanings and far reaching implications of the run up to next US election. Deepak Chopra certainly offers a tantalizing interpretation.
by Deepak Chopra
Sometimes politics has the uncanny effect of mirroring the national psyche even when nobody intended to do that. This is perfectly illustrated by the rousing effect that Gov. Sarah Palin had on the Republican convention in Minneapolis this week. On the surface, she outdoes former Vice President Dan Quayle as an unlikely choice, given her negligent parochial expertise in the complex affairs of governing. Her state of Alaska has less than 700,000 residents, which reduces the job of governor to the scale of running one-tenth of New York City. By comparison, Rudy Giuliani is a towering international figure. Palin’s pluck has been admired, and her forthrightness, but her real appeal goes deeper.
She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and turning negativity into a cause for pride. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of “the other.” For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don’t want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.) I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin’s message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a higher vision
Look at what she stands for:
* Small town values — a nostaligic return to simpler times disguises a denial of America’s global role, a return to petty, small-minded parochialism.
* Ignorance of world affairs — a repudiation of the need to repair America’s image abroad.
* Family values — a code for walling out anybody who makes a claim for social justice. Such strangers, being outside the family, don’t need to be needed.
* Rigid stands on guns and abortion — a scornful repudiation that these issues can be negotiated with those who disagree.
* Patriotism — the usual fallback in a failed war.
* ”Reform” — an italicized term, since in addition to cleaning out corruption and excessive spending, one also throws out anyone who doesn’t fit your ideology.
Palin reinforces the overall message of the reactionary right, which has been in play since 1980, that social justice is liberal-radical, that minorities and immigrants, being different from “us” pure American types, can be ignored, that progressivism takes too much effort and globalism is a foreign threat. The radical right marches under the banners of “I’m all right, Jack,” and “Why change? Everything’s OK as it is.” The irony, of course, is that Gov. Palin is a woman and a reactionary at the same time. She can add mom to apple pie on her resume, while blithely reversing forty years of feminist progress. The irony is superficial; there are millions of women who stand on the side of conservatism, however obviously they are voting against their own good. The Republicans have won multiple national elections by raising shadow issues based on fear, rejection, hostility to change, and narrow-mindedness
Obama’s call for higher ideals in politics can’t be seen in a vacuum. The shadow is real; it was bound to respond. Not just conservatives possess a shadow — we all do. So what comes next is a contest between the two forces of progress and inertia. Will the shadow win again, or has its furtive appeal become exhausted? No one can predict. The best thing about Gov. Palin is that she brought this conflict to light, which makes the upcoming debate honest. It would be a shame to elect another Reagan, whose smiling persona was a stalking horse for the reactionary forces that have brought us to the demoralized state we are in. We deserve to see what we are getting, without disguise.
September 9, 2008 at 10:12 pm by Maireid Sullivan, 601 views, 10 comments
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 03:52 on September 10th, 2008
Thought provoking, Maireid Sullivan.
at 04:33 on September 10th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's great stuff. Chopra presents a fascinating stance, well-taken.
at 05:22 on September 10th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 06:27 on September 10th, 2008
Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Interesting...
at 06:41 on September 10th, 2008
Talk about "bang on the money"! The best fundamental analysis I've seen yet.
- reply
whalen808 (not verified)at 13:46 on September 11th, 2008
Once again, these articles are so slanted either to the right or the left, it leaves the reader more confused than before. As soon as the words "failed war" in paragraph three appear you know these articles are slanted. Who says the war is failing? You are not going to get the truth watching tv. Talk with the people who have been there in uniform..they will tell you.
There is no shadow because one is not above the other, or in front of the other.... America has a choice, more government, more programs for the "Strangers" compliments of Barack
Palin offers the opposite..take your pick...
- reply
OnePinkRose (not verified)at 13:55 on September 11th, 2008
This has to be the most slanted, most absurd article ever. Anyone buying this crock should have their head examined.
- reply
HelenMarie (not verified)at 14:17 on September 11th, 2008
Absurd? I don't think so.
Deeply thought out, pure intellect, emotion-free. As Red Riding Hood put it, "Just Right".
Thank you. Now let's get back to work. Respect. Empower. Include. Obama/Biden, campaign for change
- reply
SuperDave999 (not verified)at 14:21 on September 11th, 2008
In responseto whalen808:
First, the article is obviously slanted because it portrays Obama's message in a posative light and Palin in a negative light. Obviously, anyone who supports her and McCain will not feel that this article is accurate or relevant.
That aside, I don't think anyone can truely make an arguement that this isn't a "failed war." The war is a failure, not because of where we are right now, but of where we set out to go. This war was supposed to take a matter of months... hence the very premature "mission accomplished." The fact that we are still talking about a war 4+ years later, and it refers to Iraq is case enough to label it a failure.
Also, why did we go to war? To confiscate WMD's. I guess you could say that was accomplished on the first day of the war because they were never found and never existed.
Just because the war is going better now then it was before doesn't mean it's a success. It's just not as bad as it has been. It's like several republican economists I've seen on TV recently tumpeting how the economy isn't bad, it's great because the dollar is getting stronger and consumer confidence has gone up. It's great that it's getting better, but that doesn't mean it's good...consumer confidence is still way down.
Final analogy: Just because gas has been in excess of $4.00 a gallon where I live doesn't mean I see the sign that says $3.50 now and think it's cheap. It's better, but it's still not $2.00 where it was before this administration.
at 06:26 on October 5th, 2008
Seems that most folks on the "right" find anything but Fox News propaganda to be "slanted" and "absurd". Most of the concepts Chopra is presenting would definately sound ridiculous to them because they have no idea what he is talking about. They are far more comfortable with "beliefs" than with knowledge, and anything that challenges their strongly held beliefs will be rejected out of hand.