Devestating Altered Iraqi Weapons Report Surfaces

by Emilio Lizardo | August 23, 2008 at 08:04 pm
578 views | 12 Recommendations | 32 comments

In what appears to be the boss' own red-lined corrections we now have direct evidence that final report of the chief weapons inspector was altered after the fact by someone very high in the Bush administration!

the smoking gun

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
Uwe Paschen
Uwe Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 00:27 on August 24th, 2008

Emilio Lizardo, I like this story. It's good stuff.


Hum, and then some say we cannot trust Russia, yet we should trust the US government.

We may do best trusting neither.

0
Emilio Lizardo

I think the most important line-item on the document is

 United States -- Zero Credibility ... 

Thanks for flag.

0
Mikasi

please provide a link on this. Thanks.

0
Emilio Lizardo

it's right on the bottom of the graphic . thanks.

0
joellerose

I don't see any usable link.  Please provide it.  Otherwise this story is rubbish.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Glad you liked it, JR !

Fairbanks
Fairbanks
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:34 on August 24th, 2008

Not real.  Bull, that is. 

0
Emilio Lizardo

Thanks for flag, Fairbanks!

0
Fairbanks

Some very strange behavior on this site this morning. Be careful.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Not sure what you mean ?

Strange behavior could mean lots of things - can you be more specific ?

0
Albert Milliron

You are kidding me, right? This is not news it is a faked document.  It is not formatted correctly.  Anyone who has worked for the Government knows that this document is not Credible.  I would give you a needs improvement flag, but since this is your opinion, I will let it stand.

0
Bill aka NO DooDahs!

Your grasp of politics, specifically foreign relations, will improve dramatically once you realize that there are no "good guys" and that all "leaders" are on the same plane of moral equivalency.

0
Emilio Lizardo

I would agree with your statement in its entirety, Bill, except for one change - "... once you realize that there are no "good guys" and that all "leaders" are on the same plane of moral degeneracy."

Thanks for post ...

0
joellerose

You may see moral relevancy among Hitler, Tojo, Churchill and Roosevelt, but a faked document intended to fool the viewers of NowPublic is still a faked document.

0
PEP

Fake. Fake. Sorry, unless you can prove that this is real, it looks fake, fake, fake.

And this isn't news, unless and until you can provide outside resources verifying this document. Hey, any of us could copy any readily-available document, change it how we wanted, print it out, mark on it, and and...well, it's easy to fake stuff. So what's the proof for this?


0
Emilio Lizardo

What gave you the first clue ?

The rubber stamp from the, "White House Office of Patriotic Revisionism," maybe ?

Good call !

0
Albert Milliron

Here is actual testimony to Senate by Dr. Kay on the very day your document states,

Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing

Let me begin by saying, we were almost all wrong, and I certainly include myself here.

Sen. [Edward] Kennedy knows very directly. Senator Kennedy and I talked on several occasions prior to the war that my view was that the best evidence that I had seen was that Iraq indeed had weapons of mass destruction.

I would also point out that many governments that chose not to support this war -- certainly, the French president, [Jacques] Chirac, as I recall in April of last year, referred to Iraq's possession of WMD.

The Germans certainly -- the intelligence service believed that there were WMD.

It turns out that we were all wrong, probably in my judgment, and that is most disturbing.

We're also in a period in which we've had intelligence surprises in the proliferation area that go the other way. The case of Iran, a nuclear program that the Iranians admit was 18 years on, that we underestimated. And, in fact, we didn't discover it. It was discovered by a group of Iranian dissidents outside the country who pointed the international community at the location.

The Libyan program recently discovered was far more extensive than was assessed prior to that.

There's a long record here of being wrong. There's a good reason for it. There are probably multiple reasons. Certainly proliferation is a hard thing to track, particularly in countries that deny easy and free access and don't have free and open societies.

In my judgment, based on the work that has been done to this point of the Iraq Survey Group, and in fact, that I reported to you in October, Iraq was in clear violation of the terms of [U.N.] Resolution 1441.

Resolution 1441 required that Iraq report all of its activities -- one last chance to come clean about what it had.

We have discovered hundreds of cases, based on both documents, physical evidence and the testimony of Iraqis, of activities that were prohibited under the initial U.N. Resolution 687 and that should have been reported under 1441, with Iraqi testimony that not only did they not tell the U.N. about this, they were instructed not to do it and they hid material.



0
Emilio Lizardo

I appreciate the time and effort you spent on this post, but please take a little advice - lighten up !!

Too much stress is not good for you ...

Thanks very much for references to Mr. Kay's report.

0
PEP

Although it's the poster's job to verify claims, I decided to check this out. This doesn't look like the handwriting on a signed portrait of President and Mrs. Bush given to a friend of mine.

Here's a link to a purported Bush handwriting sample, and it looks legit. And here's another, that looks like the first.

And another.

IMHO, the poster should have done the research! All of the noted samples are alike, and none are like the "document." I do handwriting analysis--and have used it in a corporate setting (quietly, with quiet approval from bosses), and there is nothing in the "document" sample that's even remotely linked to the other samples.

So, sorry, but I call bullshit on this one.


0
Emilio Lizardo

OMFG !!!

Guys - Hello ?

Hellloo ?

It's a joke, guys - a funny, funny, joke ...

All except for the part about America having zero world credibility now, which is not at all a joke, but a g-------d moral frickin' outrage !!!

Thanks for stopping by ...

0
Albert Milliron

You might want to read Dr. Kay's actual testomoney on the date of this document. 

0
Albert Milliron

Now Public is not the correct site for Jokes.  It is a NEWS site.  Now that you shared it is a joke.

0
PEP

NP is a news site, not a sophomoric jokes site. Sadly, the only credibility affected in this post is yours. Really.

0
Emilio Lizardo

Not being a news professional, but merely a cub reporter, I would expect to be allowed an error in judgement from time to time.

My sincerest apologies for having misled with this post the much more seasoned newshounds who have spent their valuable time researching veracity of this obviously fake document ...

0
dunkelberg

Teacher!  Teacher!

I spotted it!  I did.  I did.

[chuckle]


Albert Milliron
Albert Milliron
flagged this story as Fishy

at 11:22 on August 24th, 2008

Hey Emilio Lizardo I found some things that didn't pass my sniff test. Could it be... fishy??? You might want to fix some stuff up or else it's headed to the bottom of our bird cage. Want me to get particular? OK, I got a whiff that this story may not actually be true. This story may be a hoax, for all I know -- or maybe you think you're auditioning for a job at The Onion Or maybe you're gunning for our Catch of the Day award???

0
Emilio Lizardo

Dear Politisite,

I seem to recall in the not so distant past a few gag posts which people had a lot of fun with. One being the monster which washed up on Long Island, and the others, on more than a few occasions, concerning flying saucer reports ...

I am new around here, so I can understand why you might not want me to play in your sandbox, but give me a break - I am certainly not the first one to take a dump in this swimming pool !

Best, Emilio

0
Albert Milliron

It was a news story as it was in the MSM as well.  There was an issue of what the strange animal was.  It was posted in Strange. But was later put in world as well because it had so much appeal world wide.  The thing was a real thing and the fun was to identify the actual thing.


You are welcome here.  Just do news stories, no problem

0
dunkelberg

Emilio, seems you are not being politically correct.

For Pete's sake, people!

This was dubbed as OPINION from the beginning.

In my book, it is a form of editorial cartoon.  Whether you are amused, entertained or informed by it is another matter. 

The only problem some people have to have is that it is not politically correct to them.

It seems you are welcome to post politically correct stories.



dunkelberg
dunkelberg
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:31 on August 24th, 2008

Emilio Lizardo, hang in there.

Some of us have stiff upper lips, others are stiff in other places.

Enjoyed it.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from