is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
In what appears to be the boss' own red-lined corrections we now have direct evidence that final report of the chief weapons inspector was altered after the fact by someone very high in the Bush administration!
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (32)
at 00:27 on August 24th, 2008
Emilio Lizardo, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Hum, and then some say we cannot trust Russia, yet we should trust the US government.
We may do best trusting neither.
at 04:42 on August 24th, 2008
I think the most important line-item on the document is
Thanks for flag.
at 04:24 on August 24th, 2008
please provide a link on this. Thanks.
at 04:38 on August 24th, 2008
it's right on the bottom of the graphic . thanks.
at 05:38 on August 24th, 2008
I don't see any usable link. Please provide it. Otherwise this story is rubbish.
at 05:59 on August 24th, 2008
Glad you liked it, JR !
at 09:34 on August 24th, 2008
Not real. Bull, that is.
at 10:20 on August 24th, 2008
Thanks for flag, Fairbanks!
at 09:33 on August 24th, 2008
Some very strange behavior on this site this morning. Be careful.
at 10:20 on August 24th, 2008
Not sure what you mean ?
Strange behavior could mean lots of things - can you be more specific ?
at 10:55 on August 24th, 2008
You are kidding me, right? This is not news it is a faked document. It is not formatted correctly. Anyone who has worked for the Government knows that this document is not Credible. I would give you a needs improvement flag, but since this is your opinion, I will let it stand.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Bill aka NO DooDahs! (not verified)at 11:06 on August 24th, 2008
Your grasp of politics, specifically foreign relations, will improve dramatically once you realize that there are no "good guys" and that all "leaders" are on the same plane of moral equivalency.
at 11:10 on August 24th, 2008
I would agree with your statement in its entirety, Bill, except for one change - "... once you realize that there are no "good guys" and that all "leaders" are on the same plane of moral degeneracy."
Thanks for post ...
at 11:16 on August 24th, 2008
You may see moral relevancy among Hitler, Tojo, Churchill and Roosevelt, but a faked document intended to fool the viewers of NowPublic is still a faked document.
at 11:08 on August 24th, 2008
Fake. Fake. Sorry, unless you can prove that this is real, it looks fake, fake, fake.
And this isn't news, unless and until you can provide outside resources verifying this document. Hey, any of us could copy any readily-available document, change it how we wanted, print it out, mark on it, and and...well, it's easy to fake stuff. So what's the proof for this?
at 11:17 on August 24th, 2008
What gave you the first clue ?
The rubber stamp from the, "White House Office of Patriotic Revisionism," maybe ?
Good call !
at 11:13 on August 24th, 2008
Here is actual testimony to Senate by Dr. Kay on the very day your document states,
Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing
Source: cnn.com
at 11:19 on August 24th, 2008
I appreciate the time and effort you spent on this post, but please take a little advice - lighten up !!
Too much stress is not good for you ...
Thanks very much for references to Mr. Kay's report.
at 11:14 on August 24th, 2008
Although it's the poster's job to verify claims, I decided to check this out. This doesn't look like the handwriting on a signed portrait of President and Mrs. Bush given to a friend of mine.
Here's a link to a purported Bush handwriting sample, and it looks legit. And here's another, that looks like the first.
And another.
IMHO, the poster should have done the research! All of the noted samples are alike, and none are like the "document." I do handwriting analysis--and have used it in a corporate setting (quietly, with quiet approval from bosses), and there is nothing in the "document" sample that's even remotely linked to the other samples.
So, sorry, but I call bullshit on this one.
at 11:14 on August 24th, 2008
OMFG !!!
Guys - Hello ?
Hellloo ?
It's a joke, guys - a funny, funny, joke ...
All except for the part about America having zero world credibility now, which is not at all a joke, but a g-------d moral frickin' outrage !!!
Thanks for stopping by ...
at 11:19 on August 24th, 2008
You might want to read Dr. Kay's actual testomoney on the date of this document.
at 11:20 on August 24th, 2008
Now Public is not the correct site for Jokes. It is a NEWS site. Now that you shared it is a joke.
at 11:23 on August 24th, 2008
NP is a news site, not a sophomoric jokes site. Sadly, the only credibility affected in this post is yours. Really.
at 11:33 on August 24th, 2008
Not being a news professional, but merely a cub reporter, I would expect to be allowed an error in judgement from time to time.
My sincerest apologies for having misled with this post the much more seasoned newshounds who have spent their valuable time researching veracity of this obviously fake document ...
at 11:42 on August 24th, 2008
Teacher! Teacher!
I spotted it! I did. I did.
[chuckle]
at 11:22 on August 24th, 2008
Hey Emilio Lizardo I found some things that didn't pass my sniff test. Could it be... fishy??? You might want to fix some stuff up or else it's headed to the bottom of our bird cage. Want me to get particular? OK, I got a whiff that this story may not actually be true. This story may be a hoax, for all I know -- or maybe you think you're auditioning for a job at The Onion Or maybe you're gunning for our Catch of the Day award???
at 11:37 on August 24th, 2008
Dear Politisite,
I seem to recall in the not so distant past a few gag posts which people had a lot of fun with. One being the monster which washed up on Long Island, and the others, on more than a few occasions, concerning flying saucer reports ...
I am new around here, so I can understand why you might not want me to play in your sandbox, but give me a break - I am certainly not the first one to take a dump in this swimming pool !
Best, Emilio
at 11:53 on August 24th, 2008
It was a news story as it was in the MSM as well. There was an issue of what the strange animal was. It was posted in Strange. But was later put in world as well because it had so much appeal world wide. The thing was a real thing and the fun was to identify the actual thing.
You are welcome here. Just do news stories, no problem
at 12:06 on August 24th, 2008
Emilio, seems you are not being politically correct.
For Pete's sake, people!
This was dubbed as OPINION from the beginning.
In my book, it is a form of editorial cartoon. Whether you are amused, entertained or informed by it is another matter.
The only problem some people have to have is that it is not politically correct to them.
It seems you are welcome to post politically correct stories.
at 11:31 on August 24th, 2008
Emilio Lizardo, hang in there.
Some of us have stiff upper lips, others are stiff in other places.
Enjoyed it.