Hey bartolomeo7, I'm having doubts about the plausibility of this material; it seems that this story might not be true. Please see our flagging guide to learn more about this flag. For further help, please check our our FAQ.
NP Rank:
The French investigation said it could not prove any photographer, following on a motorcycle saw the crash.No photographer attended the last inquest in England, therefore they did not testify that the saw the crash and were herefore not following the limousine, and did not chase the driver into the wall, the fairy tale which everyone believes.Two witnesses testified over the telephone from France however that one saw a bright light at the moment of the crash, and the other saw a motorcycle speed from the other end of the tunnel and therefore a rider could have flashed a bright light into the driver's face. That light shiner therefore killed Diana, except one cant but wonder who put him up to it. I do not think that an already divorced wife was a threat to any of the royal family, or that the possibility of her having an arab child would present any threat to the throne of England to necessitate murder.since three or five heirs apparent already exist, Charles, William, Harold, Ann and Andrew.
Hey bartolomeo7, I'm having doubts about the plausibility of this material; it seems that this story might not be true. Please see our flagging guide to learn more about this flag. For further help, please check our our FAQ.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 16:12 on May 12th, 2009
The story is based on the British inquest and the first French investigative report, both of which can be found on the net.