NP Rank:
Did Brazil Release Sean Goldman To Retain Trade Benefits?
The Goldman family drama has captured the attention of thousands of people in the United States and around the world, as nine-year-old American-born Sean Goldman ended up at the center of an international custody battle. David Goldman, the boy's father living in the United States, was trying to regain custdy of his son illegally smuggled into Brazil in 2004 by his ex-wife Bruna Bianchi. Yesterday, amidst a growing media hype, the Supreme Court of Brazil has ruled that the boy should be returned to his father. But today, allegations surfaced suggesting that the Brazilian Court's decision might have come in an effort to retain trade benefits with the United States.
So, did Brazil order Sean Goldman to be returned to his father in order retain trade benefits?
It is alleged that the Senator of New Jersey Frank Lautenberg placed a hold on a bill that reduced export tariffs for Brazil, saving the country $2.75 billion. The hold was removed as soon as the Brazilian Court ruled that Sean Goldman should be returned to his father. The spokesman for Lautenberg confirmed that the hold was designed to exert additional pressure on Brazilian government. But, is it fair to use political and economic powers to impact a civil court decision, especially when the effort comes from a U.S. Senator?
Yesterday, a press release from Sen. Lautenberg's office said, "Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ), a leader in the fight to reunite the Goldman family, today applauded the Brazilian Supreme Court decision that Sean Goldman must be returned to his father." The release goes on to describe Senator Lautenberg's efforts to secure the boy's release -- "Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ), a leader in the fight to reunite the Goldman family, today applauded the Brazilian Supreme Court decision that Sean Goldman must be returned to his father." There was no word in the statement about the hold on the trade bill.
But, Brazil's Attorney General said, "Not releasing the minor into the custody of his father could bring sanctions against Brazil... It could damage Brazil's image before the international community."
NowPublic on Facebook
Recommendations (30)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Barbara McPherson
Nanaimo, Canada


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (13)
at 13:56 on December 23rd, 2009
Good going, a Senator willing to stick up for a US Citizen as opposed to all those who defend ILLEGAL aliens before US Citizens. I hope all US Congress will follow in his wake and stick up for us US Citizens. This is an example of the way this world wishes to walk all over the US. Less we forget this child is not just the child of David Goldman but he too is a US Citizen. Why was his US culture denied him for these five years. VIVA US AMERICA!
at 14:31 on December 23rd, 2009
The Brazilian Supreme Court was on the brink of taking its decision when the Senator decided to take such stupid step. Clearly he wanted to be recognised as the hero of this case. In Brazil, the government and Justice are completely independent and autonomous, just like in the USA. It's a kind of arrogance to imagine that an American Senator could influence the decision of Brazilian justice by threatening to reduce export tariffs. If you are not aware, the American exports to Brazil are superior to its imports, so in case of such stupid sanction off course Brazil would retaliate immediately and the big looser would be your American companies, off course. But no reasonable people here (and I believe also not in USA) think that such a complicated familiar issue could be solved through menaces on State levels. By the way, you American need desperately to increase your exports to compensate the disgraces in your domestic market. Better be more cooperative, specially considering that Brazil is a long and loyal trade partner. Your senator should be blamed for such a stupidity, but on the contrary you are celebrating ! Be reasonable !(A.L.Mirri, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil)
at 05:16 on December 24th, 2009
That "stupid" step got your third world country with it's corrupt legal system to move it's ass, do you think it is okay to steal kids from their fathers? Brazilian justice has taken 5 years to do right by David Goldman and his son, if you mess with the U.S. we'll turn your country into Cuba that's why your backwater excuse for a country conceded to our demands.
at 19:20 on December 29th, 2009
Stupid motherfucker! If our country becomes a little more like Cuba it would be a bless. We don't need people like you and we don't need your beloved almighty country! We would be better without all this arrogance. Minds like yours are the problem of this world.
at 14:53 on December 23rd, 2009
H*ll yeah! Screw Brazil. They just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they could care less about human life. Only when they were monetarily threatened did they concede to do the right thing. Sean should have been given back to his father 5 years ago! Absolutely disgusting and a travesty for the Goldman family. I hope he files a civil suit against that kidnapper stepfather guy and takes him for millions. I too wish more politicians did more of this kind of thing to get rid of all the illegals here. Stop sneaking across our borders, plopping kids, and siphoning our resources. Mexico I am talking to you. I am sick of my money going to fund programs that help illegal immigrants. Get out. We don't want you here. I don't need you to clean my house, take my order at Burger King (can't understand you anyway because you refuse to learn our language), I don't need you to pick my strawberries, and I certainly don't want your kids in my kid's classroom because they can't speak the language either. UGH. I seriously wish some president would sack up and round all the illegals up and ship them back. Other countries do it and so should we. Canada doesn't have this problem. Australia doesn't have this problem. Just effing leave!
at 18:14 on December 23rd, 2009
I think it would do us all good if we stop to remember that all of us or our grandparents are from someplace else. Probably any country that has reasonable living standards has illegal immigration problems. Canada certainly has.
at 18:21 on December 23rd, 2009
Willy Brandt, a former German Chancellor said in the 70 "We are all Foreigners to some one and in most places." "It is imperative to treat all equally and with respect."
at 15:51 on December 23rd, 2009
I think the Senator released the bill too soon. Sean is still in Brazil. He should have waited until Sean was in the US. And not a second before. After 5 years of ignoring the international agreements, poisoning Sean against his father and stalling every step of the way I don't trust any of them.
at 01:36 on December 26th, 2009
I totally agree with you! They should have waited until Sena was safe home!Thank God all went well.
at 18:17 on December 23rd, 2009
That would make the whole matter sour and questionable.
at 06:46 on December 24th, 2009
Absolutely ridiculous. You realy believe there is no another democracy in the world? Patetic.
at 08:23 on December 24th, 2009
I honestly want to believe that most Americans disagree with the chauvinist opinions of some comentators here. We should not be talking about a State conflict, but a complicated familiar affair on Justice level. I'd like to remember you abou the Elian affair, the Cuban boy who lived in USA and was returned to their blood parents in Cuba after a long judicial battle. It's patetic to claim American superiority to influence such cases. I agreee with comentator A.L.Mirri that your Senator sadly abused of his position to mix State affairs in this case. He's been opportunistic and had no idea of the consequences that a Brazilian retaliation could represent to the American companies exporting and making business in Brazil. The trade balance between Brazil and USA is now widely favourable to USA, the Senator should be aware of that. You Americans should be more respectful with other nations.
at 18:56 on December 24th, 2009
If the little boy from Cuba situation was wrong on the US side. Then the US was the dumb party in regards to Elian. That doesn't make Brazil any less guilty. Wrong is wrong. For the people in Brazil to act like there is an injustice is insane. The Brazilian family held the boy 5 years while the corrupt judicial system in Brazil allowed it. I despise the people who try to use another wrong to validate their point. The US was right to hold out on the money. God knows what the family in Brazil was telling this boy over the last 5 years. Anyone in Brazil would like to comment on that?